Monday, July 11, 2011

Case of Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich

Case of Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich
Former Director, Bellmore Jewish Center - Bellmore, NY 
Former Vice President, Long Island Board of Rabbis - Bellmore, NY



Rabbi Rabinowich was a married conservative rabbi who was hiring women to have sex with him.  He was caught on a video over the Jewish sabbath.

A New York judge has dismissed a lawsuit that was filed by Avraham Rabinowich against the New York Post over a video purportedly showing him in a hotel-room tryst with alleged prostitutes.  Rabbi Rabinowich claimed he lost his position working at the Bellmore Jewish Center because of the publicity of the film clip.

____________________________________________________________________________________


Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:


2011
  1. The 'randy' rabbi(07/11/2011)
  2. Avraham Rabinowich, Long Island Rabbi, Videotaped With Prostitute on the Sabbath (07/11/2011)
  3. Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich Busted By Estranged Wife For Hiring Prostitutes On Sabbath (07/11/2011)
  4. Randy Rabbi 'caught on tape in bed with a prostitute' - after a sting set up by his wife
  5. (07/11/2011)
  6. Long Island Rabbi Busted by Ex-Wife for Hiring Prostitutes on the Sabbath (07/11/2011)
  7. Dreidel-as-Metaphor: Long Island Rabbi Caught in Sex Scandal, NY Post Reports (07/11/2011)
  8. The New York rabbi and the Shabbat sex scandal (07/12/2011)
  9. Court Document (09/13/2011)
  10. 'Randy Rabbi' Raging Mad at NY Post (09/16/2011)

2012 
  1. NY Post wins bid to dismiss suit over 'randy' rabbi story (09/08/2012)

____________________________________________________________________________________

The 'randy' rabbi
Prostitution sting in angry ex-wife's suit
By Rebecca Rosenberg
New York Post - July 11, 2011

A prominent Long Island Jewish leader was caught with his dreidel out in a string of sordid sex tapes, according to sensational Manhattan court records. 

Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich -- who leads the wealthy, Conservative Bellmore Jewish Center and is vice president of the Long Island Board of Rabbis -- allegedly made appointments with prostitutes on the Sabbath shortly after services. 

He was then caught on camera in a hotel room enjoying some hard-core, commandment-breaking action, according to blockbuster court papers filed in state Supreme Court in Manhattan.


The holy man's estranged wife, Amora, a respected psychologist, got wind of the tawdry tricks while they were going through a bitter custody battle, she said. 

She managed to have Rabinowich secretly filmed with a call girl and entered the photographic evidence into the record of the bitter custody case. 

"Since when are prostitutes kosher?" Amora Rabinowich told The Post. "He was coming to court claiming he was this pious individual, but he was using the phone on the Sabbath to meet prostitutes. 

"And what kind of rabbi is he? He didn't even take these prostitutes to the mikvah [Jewish ritual cleansing bath] first. 

"What is he doing, praying or laying?" 

Rabbi Rabinowich responded to the shocking claims by saying only, "I have no response. Have a nice day." 

His lawyer, Jeffrey Lewisohn, called the wife's discovery a "setup" and downplayed the matter, saying, "It doesn't matter, this was five or six years ago." 

Malcolm Taub, a former lawyer for the rabbi, blasted Amora, saying, "This is a very sick woman . . . This man has gone through hell with this woman."

____________________________________________________________________________________

Avraham Rabinowich, Long Island Rabbi, Videotaped With Prostitute on the Sabbath 
By Joe Conscarelli
The Village Voice - July 11, 2011

Dr. Amora Rachelle, the ex-wife of Avraham Rabinowich, vice president of the Long Island Board of Rabbis, is going hard in her custody battle with a pretty inexcusable, not-so-secret weapon, which she's handed right over to the New York Post. With the help of a private investigator, Amora taped her children's father being serviced by a call girl and her madam, who was actually Amora's private eye. "Since when are prostitutes kosher?" Amora asked, with expert media savvy. "And what kind of rabbi is he? He didn't even take these prostitutes to the mikvah [Jewish ritual cleansing bath] first. What is he doing, praying or laying?" The rabbi said he had "no response," though his lawyer piped up to call the sting a "setup" (well, yes) and insist, "It doesn't matter, this was five or six years ago." It was six months before the couple's divorce was finalized.

"I am tall and nice-looking, don't worry, I'm OK," the rabbi reportedly told the madam/P.I. The tape, part of which can be seen below (with blurs, but still probably NSFW), was taken at a hotel in Queens on March 18, 2006. 

The mother is now attempting to move her children to the West Coast and has made a power play by releasing the dirty parts of her sting. 

"If you're not doing something relevant in front of the children, it doesn't have an impact on the judge's decision," the rabbi's lawyer claims. Do the newspaper and internet count as "in front of the children?" Dirty tricks all around.

____________________________________________________________________________________
 
Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich Busted By Estranged Wife For Hiring Prostitutes On Sabbath
The Huffington Post - July 11, 2011 


The New York Post reports today that Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich, leader of the conservative Bellmore Jewish Center and vice president of the Long Island Board of Rabbis, allegedly made appointments with prostitutes on the Sabbath shortly after services.

Rabinowich's estranged wife, Amora, managed to secretly film one of Rabinowich's scandalous hotel rendezvous's with a call girl after having heard of her holy hubby's penchant for prostitutes (he allegedly arranged the trysts after Sabbath services using his cell phone)-- and entered the photographic evidence into the record of a bitter custody trial.

"Since when are prostitutes kosher?" Amora told the Post, adding "And what kind of rabbi is he? He didn't even take these prostitutes to the mikvah [Jewish ritual cleansing bath] first."

The tapes, from a few years ago, weren't allowed in court and the couple was given joint custody of their three children. It seems Amora, a respected psychologist, released the tapes to the Post for fun, or perhaps in anticipation that the footage would further tarnish Rabinowich's reputation as she plans to make a motion in court to move the kids out to the West Coast. 

The news is the latest in a series of New York area stories of Rabbis behaving badly. Rabbi Gavriel Bidany was convicted in May of fondling an Israeli Army officer on a JFK-bound plane. Brooklyn Rabbi Saul Kassin was convicted in June of using a charity he controlled to illegally funnel money to Israel. And also in June, David Twersky, a rabbi in Rockland County New York, was accused of ordering followers to burn down the house of a synagogue member who defected to another congregation.
____________________________________________________________________________________
 
Randy Rabbi 'caught on tape in bed with a prostitute' - after a sting set up by his wife  
Daily Mail - July 11, 2011 


A prominent New York Rabbi thought he was setting up a romp with a sexy call girl -- but instead he ended up in bed with a private investigator hired by his estranged wife.

Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich, vice president of the Long Island, NY Board of Rabbis, allegedly had a habit of cavorting with prostitutes. 

Some of this encounters even took place on the Sabbath after services concluded, according to Manhattan court records.

He was finally caught out when his psychologist wife, Amora, found out about the trysts during a bitter custody battle. 

Amora hired a private investigator and set up a sting to catch her husband on tape enjoying his extra-marital encounters.

'Since when are prostitutes kosher?' Amora told The New York Post of the Rabbi, who also leads the wealthy and conservative Bellmore Jewish Center.

'He was coming to court claiming he was this pious individual, but he was using the phone on the Sabbath to meet prostitutes.'

The sting happened in a cheap hotel in Queens on March 18, 2006, when Rabinowich contacted a 'madam' who was actually the private investigator. He allegedly told her:  'I am tall and nice-looking, don't worry, I'm OK.'

Rabinowich is seen relaxing on the hotel bed while two women -- one of whom is the undercover investigator -- hover over him and attend to his needs. 

n enraged Amora blasted her former husband, telling the Post: 'And what kind of rabbi is he? He didn't even take these prostitutes to the mikvah [Jewish ritual cleansing bath] first. What is he doing, praying or laying?'

She added,  'He needs help, serious help, to be a healthy individual and to be a proper role model to both the children and the community.'

Rabbi Rabinowich had little to say about the allegations, telling the Post only: 'I have no response. Have a nice day.'

But his lawyer, Jeffrey Lewisohn, called Amora's revelations a 'setup' and brushed off the Rabbi's antics:  'It doesn't matter, this was five or six years ago.'

And the holy man's former lawyer, Malcolm Taub, slammed Amora, saying, 'This is a very sick woman . . . This man has gone through hell with this woman.'

However, while Amora entered the photographic evidence into the record of the custody battle, a judge ruled it was not relevant to the case. 

The couple now share custody --  but Amora says the video could become relevant as she plans to make a motion to the court to move their kids to the West Coast on Aug. 17.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Long Island Rabbi Busted by Ex-Wife for Hiring Prostitutes on the Sabbath
By Chris Rovzar
New York Magazine - July 11, 2011

Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich, the leader of the well-to-do conservative Bellmore Jewish Center on Long Island, has some awkward Sabbath activities to explain. As part of a bitter custody battle, his then-estranged wife arranged for a private investigator to film Rabinowich's tryst in a cheap hotel room with a prostitute. (The tapes, from several years ago, weren't allowed in court, but the ex released them to the Post, just for fun.) The trysts were arranged after services on the Sabbath, via cell phone. "Since when are prostitutes kosher?" the ex-wife, Amora Rabinowich, told the tabloid. "He was coming to court claiming he was this pious individual, but he was using the phone on the Sabbath to meet prostitutes." Apparently the years have allowed Amora to see humor in all of this. (Though we imagine the rabbi, who had no comment, is not laughing.) "And what kind of rabbi is he?" Amora cracked. "He didn't even take these prostitutes to the mikvah first!"


____________________________________________________________________________________

Dreidel-as-Metaphor: Long Island Rabbi Caught in Sex Scandal, NY Post Reports
By Michael Kaminer
Forward - July 11, 2011

When is a dreidel not a dreidel? When it’s a stand-in for male genitalia in a tabloid story on a rabbi’s sexual escapades.

According to today’s New York Post, Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich — vice president of the Long Island Board of Rabbis, and head of the Bellmore Jewish Center — was “caught with his dreidel out in a string of sordid sex tapes, according to sensational Manhattan court records.”

Rabinowich “allegedly made appointments with prostitutes on the Sabbath shortly after services,” the Post reports. “He was then caught on camera in a hotel room enjoying some hard-core, commandment-breaking action, according to blockbuster court papers filed in state Supreme Court in Manhattan.”

____________________________________________________________________________________
Court Document
Supreme Court of The State of New York - County of New York - September 13, 2011

 






















____________________________________________________________________________________
 'Randy Rabbi' Raging Mad at NY Post
By Adam Klasfeld
Courthouse News Services - September 16, 2011 
 
MANHATTAN (CN) - The New York Post called him the "Randy Rabbi," and Long Island Rabbi Avraham Rabinowich has responded with a breach of contract lawsuit against the tabloid and his ex-wife, for publishing salacious documents, photographs and videos that allegedly caught him with prostitutes at a motel after Sabbath services.
 

Rabinowich and Amora Rachel Leah Rabinowich entered into a "Stipulation of Settlement" setting the terms of their divorce on Sept. 27, 2010, according to the rabbi's complaint in New York County Court.
 

One of term stated: "Neither parent shall do anything or say anything to a third party, which might degrade or injure the opinion of the other parent or his/her family in the third party's eyes," according to the complaint. "Neither party shall do anything directly, indirectly or through third parties to hurt the reputation of the other in the community in which such parties work or reside. The parties acknowledge that this is a material provision of this stipulation and part of the stipulation for the best interests of the children."
 

Under the agreement, neither party could hire an investigator to tape or photograph the other, and both should treat anything already captured in such an investigation as confidential, according to the complaint.
 

About a month later, the rabbi said, he and his ex added a provision that would prevent embarrassing leaks to the press: "Each party agrees that he/she will not directly or indirectly cause photographs, video or similar images of the other party to be disseminated to the media or any agent of the media or through third parties to hurt the reputation of the other in the community in which the parties work or reside," the new stipulation stated, according to the complaint.
 

Rabinowich says that the Post knew of these terms before it printed its July 11 story under the headline: "The 'randy' rabbi - Prostitution sting in angry ex-wife's suit."
 

The Post reported that Rabinowich had been "caught with his dreidel out in a string of sordid sex tapes," and published one of those videos online.
 

The article, which is still available on the Post's website, showed a photo of Rabinowich in bed with two women, though the accompanying video appears to have been replaced with other news clips.
 

Rabinowich states in his complaint that the article had "no palpable, intrinsic or realistic newsworthiness or public interest other than their prurient, salacious nature, luridness and sheer sensationalism."

And the rabbi say the Post "purposefully waited until Friday evening and several minutes before the commencement of the Jewish Sabbath before notifying the plaintiff's representatives of their intentions to publish the article and the videotapes ... thereby denying the plaintiff any opportunity to apply for an injunction or restraining order or pursuit of any remedies available to him under the terms of the aforementioned stipulation and contract."
 

 He says that he suffered "extreme humiliation, scorn, derision, humiliation" and "was summarily fired from his position as a local rabbi at a loss of his annual salary and that plaintiff's reputation has been ruined such that he cannot find gainful employment and has suffered profound emotional damage."

Rabinowich seeks damages for interference with contract, inducing breach of contract and emotional distress.

He is represented by Morrison & Wagner.
____________________________________________________________________________________

The New York rabbi and the Shabbat sex scandal
By Jennifer Lipman
Jewish Chronicle - July 12, 2011

A rabbi and his wife are engaged in a court battle over his alleged involvement with prostitutes and her role in a sting operation to catch him.

Long Island rabbi Avraham Rabinowich, who is even alleged to have hired prostitutes on Shabbat – after services - was secretly filmed by a private investigator. The investigator had been hired by his wife Dr Amora Rachelle during a custody fight.

The father-of-three is the vice president of the Long Island Board of Rabbis and a highly respected rabbi in New York's Masorti Jewish community.

The case dates back to 2006, when the rabbi was filmed in a hotel room with two women.

Dr Rachelle, who said "since when are prostitutes kosher?", also told the New York Post that she was particularly angered by her supposedly pious husband's failure to take the women to a mikvah (ritual bath).

The case continues at the Manhattan state Supreme Court.

____________________________________________________________________________________


NY Post wins bid to dismiss suit over 'randy' rabbi story
By Jessica Dye
Reuters - September 28, 2012


NEW YORK, Sept 28 (Reuters) - A New York judge has dismissed a lawsuit a Long Island rabbi brought against the New York Post over a video purportedly showing him in a hotel-room tryst with alleged prostitutes.

Avraham Rabinowich claimed he lost his job as the chief rabbi of a prominent conservative congregation as a result of a Post story and video published on July 11, 2011, under the headline "The 'randy' rabbi -- Prostitution sting in angry ex-wife's suit." Rabinowich claimed he had been lured to the hotel room by his former wife, Amora Rabinowich, while the two were locked in a bitter custody dispute. He sued the newspaper and Amora Rabinowich, who hired the private investigator that shot a video of him in 2006, according to the ruling.

In granting the Post's motion to dismiss, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Anil Singh said that Rabinowich had only challenged the truth of two points in the story: that he had knowingly engaged prostitutes and that he broke the Jewish Sabbath to arrange to meet them.

"Other than those two allegations, based on the amended complaint and plaintiff's affirmation, the story is substantially true and is not actionable," Singh wrote in Thursday's ruling.

The Post story was about how Rainowich was allegedly caught "with his Dreidel out" in the video obtained by the newspaper.

The video, which has been removed from the Post's website, depicted Rabinowich reclining while an alleged prostitute caressed and kissed him, according to the ruling. In the video, Rabinowich is nude from the waist up, and a dreidel is superimposed to obscure any nudity below the waist, the ruling stated. A dubbed version of "The Dreidel Song" played over voices in the background, the ruling said.

Rabinowich says he lost his post with the Bellmore Jewish Center in Long Island after the video and accompanying article ran.

In his 2011 lawsuit, he sued for defamation, invasion of privacy and interference with a divorce settlement finalized in 2010, which he said forbade the parties from publishing pictures or video to hurt the other's reputation. The lawsuit sought an unspecified amount of damages.

Singh said that Rabinowich had failed to state a defamation claim, which requires a plaintiff to plead falsity under New York Civil Practice Law and Rules 3016.

Addressing Rabinowich's claim that his right to privacy had been violated, the judge noted that under Civil Rights Law Section 51, which bars the use of an individual's name or likeness without written consent for trade or advertising purposes, there is an exception for "newsworthy matters."

"Newsworthiness is construed broadly, with the courts reviewing the exercise of judgment and discretion of journalists only in cases of clear abuse," Singh wrote.

In addition to dismissing the suit against the Post, the judge granted the rabbi's cross-motion to file a second amended complaint against Amora Rabinowich, which said that the Post had published an additional defamatory story on July 11, 2001, reporting that she had been charged with practicing psychology without a license. The judge said the second amended complaint could not be brought against the Post because it did not cure the deficiencies of the first amended complaint.

Rabinowich's lawyer, Eric Morrison, said his client was "disappointed with the court's findings" and was considering an appeal. A spokeswoman for the Post declined to comment. No lawyer was listed for Amora Rabinowich, who could not be reached for comment.

The case is Rabinowich v. NY Post Holdings Inc, New York State Supreme Court, New York County, No. 110427/2011.

For Rabinowich: Eric Morrison of Morrison & Wagner.

For the New York Post: Katherine Bolger of Levine Sullivan Koch & Schulz.


____________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE
 
Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


____________________________________________________________________________________

Wednesday, June 22, 2011

Case of Menachem Deutsch

Menachem Deutsch
(AKA: Mendel Deutsch) 

Simcha Hall Synagogue - (Borough Park) Brooklyn, NY


Convicted sex offender.  On June 22, 2011, Menachem Deutsch lured a 12-year-old boy into Simcha Hall, a Borough Park synagogue and sexually assaulted him.  He was originally arrested on June 26, 2011.  

Deutsch was sentenced to six months in prison and once released will be placed on the New York State Sex Offender Registry.

Mendel Deutsch is a member of the Beltz Chassidum.  
_______________________________________________________________________


Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:

2011
  1. Brooklyn teen surrenders in abuse case  (06/26/2011)
  2. Arrest in Brooklyn synagogue molestation case (06/27/2011)


2013
  1. Names of 46 convicted child sex offenders who terrorized the Orthodox Jewish community from within are released by Brooklyn DA (07/22/2013)
  2. New York City Department of Correction Inmate Lookup (10/25/2013)

2014

  1. New York Sex Offender Registry (01/01/2014)


________________________________________________________________________________

Brooklyn teen surrenders in abuse case
By Daniel Edward Rosen
New York Post - June 26, 2011

A Brooklyn teen, accompanied by his rabbi and a lawyer, surrendered today in the molestation of a youngster in the basement of a Borough Park synagogue.
Menachem Deutsch, 19, was charged with unlawful imprisonment and child endangerment in the June 22 attack, authorities said.
Deutsch, dressed in traditional Hasidic attire, allegedly lured a 12-year-old boy walking home from school into Simcha Hall, a basement event space located inside a synagogue at 15th Avenue and 50th Street, authorities said.
Once inside, Deutsch brought the boy into a bathroom and allegedly groped and molested the child over the course of an hour.
_________________________________________________________________________________

Arrest in Brooklyn Synagogue molestation case
A 19-year-old man is under arrest Sunday night, accused of molesting a boy in a Brooklyn synagogue.

Menachem Deutsch turned himself in to police on Sunday.

He's charged with sexual abuse and acting in a manner injurious to a child.

Deutsch is accused of luring boys into a Brooklyn synagogue and then sexually assaulting at least one of them.

Police say the sex attack happened during the afternoon on Wednesday, June 22.

Police say Deutsch lured a 12-year-old boy into Simcha Hall, a Borough Park synagogue located at 50th Street and 15th Avenue.

Once in the basement, police say Deutsch sexually assaulted the boy.

Police say about an hour later, a second boy, 11, was confronted by Deutsch in front of the synagogue.

That boy was not sexually assaulted but was lured into the synagogue.
_________________________________________________________________________________


Names of 46 convicted child sex offenders who terrorized the Orthodox Jewish community from within are released by Brooklyn DA
Daily Mail Reporter - July 22, 2013

The Brooklyn District Attorney has released a list of the 45 men and a woman convicted since a clampdown on sex abuse within its ultra-Orthodox Jewish community was launched four years ago.

DA Charles Hynes, who is running for re-election in the New York district, released their identities in an apparent U-turn on his previous policy of not naming perverts for fear victims might suffer intimidation or that others may be deterred from coming forward.


NAMED AND SHAMED: THE PREDATORS OF NEW YORK'S ORTHODOX JEWISH COMMUNITY THAT HAVE BEEN CONVICTED OF ABUSE SINCE 2009

  1. Simon Lemmer, 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Act
  2. Moshe Spitzer, 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Act
  3. Yona Weinberg, 2nd Degree Sexual Abuse; Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  4. Stefan Colmer, 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Act
  5. Joel Pinter, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  6. Shlomo Tourjman, 2nd Degree Course of Sexual Conduct Against a Child
  7. Nathan Actman, Sexual Misconduct
  8. Boris Shaulov, two counts 3rd Degree Rape; 3rd Degree Criminal Sexual Act; Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  9. Constantine Kotzalides, First Degree Sexual Abuse
  10. Fredy Conde, 1st Degree Sexual Absue
  11. Simon Benisty, 1st Degree Sexual Abuse
  12. Yaakov Maimon, 1st Degree Sexual Abuse
  13. Bjorn Daley, 2nd Degree Attempted Kidnapping
  14. Solomon Marmorstein, Attempted Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  15. Sheldon Siller, 2nd Degree Criminal Contemp
  16. Tzvi Boxer, 1st Degree Course of Sexual Conduct
  17. Joseph Passof, 1st Degree Sexual Abuse
  18. David Klausner, 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Act
  19. Emanuel Yegutkin, 1st Degree Course of Sexual Conduct Against a Chil
  20. Michael Sabo, Predatory Sexual Assault Against a Child
  21. Andrew Goodman, 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Act
  22. Meir Dascalowitz, 2nd Degree Criminal Sexual Act
  23. Nechemya Weberman, 1st Degree Course of Sexual Conduct Against a Child
  24. Yosef Donin, 2nd Degree Course of Sexual Conduct Against a Child
  25. Hector Valerdi, 1st Degree Sexual Abuse
  26. Jacob Kaff, 2nd Degree Course of Sexual Conduct Against a Child
  27. Menachem Deutsch, 1st Degree Sexual Abuse
  28. Arthur Samet, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  29. Israel Nivazou, Attempted Forcible Touching
  30. Frankie Hatton, Forcible Touching
  31. Chaim Becker, 3rd Degree Sexual Abuse
  32. Moshe Keller, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  33. Jedrych Macie, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  34. Moshe Vaisfiche, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  35. John Pilieci, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  36. Eli Belili, Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  37. Nuchum Hammerman, Attempted Endangering the Welfare of a Child
  38. Robert Mannis, Endangering the Welfare of a Child

_________________________________________________________________________________


New York City Department of Correction Inmate Lookup
October 25, 2013


click on image to enlarge


_________________________________________________________________________________

New York Sex Offender Registry
January 1, 2014

click on image to enlarge


_________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE

 
Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

________________________________________________________________________

 "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." -- Margaret Mead
_________________________________________________________________________________


Sunday, May 22, 2011

Monday, April 04, 2011

Honoring Polly Poskin


Honoring Polly Poskin

Polly Poskin is a pioneer in the anti-rape movement.  
She has been the executive director of ICASA (Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault) for over 40 years.


April is Sexual Assault Awareness Month

Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.


Table of Contents:  
  1. New rape law knocks down barriers to prosecution (10/09/1983)
    History of the Anti-Rape Movement in Illinois (1996)
  2. Interview with Polly Poskin, Executive Director of the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault (06/10/2011)



Interview with Polly Poskin, Executive Director of the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault
End the Backlog.org - June 10, 2011
http://endthebacklog.org/blog/?p=500


Polly Poskin, Executive Director of the Illinois Coalition Against Sexual Assault, took some time to speak with me about her work to end sexual violence in Illinois, the progress on there on the rape kit backlog and the culture of violence against women. Her words were incredibly informed and powerful and this transcript hardly seems to do them justice. We are pleased to be sharing this interview with you today.
Sarah Tofte: Polly, thank you very much for taking the time to speak with me today. Let’s talk a bit about how you got interested in working on violence against women issues.
Polly Poskin: In college, I focused on women’s history for my graduate degree. That was a time when we were learning about the women’s movement. So much of the focus was improving access to education, improving employment opportunities and expanding daycare. And we got into reproductive rights. Our women’s movement focused on educational opportunities for women, equal pay, child-bearing and child-caring issues and the right of a woman to control her body. We never talked about domestic violence and rape. I wasn’t aware of those issues in 1970.
ST: So, when did violence against women come into your work?
PP: I remember the New York Radical Feminists held a “Speak Out” on rape in New York City in 1971. I came to understand that if women were to gain equality and be free to move about safely in this culture, we were going to have to have sexual safety. If women were to feel liberated, they needed to be safe. And I realized that if we don’t end violence in women’s lives, women were never going to be safe, free and even remotely equal to men in all the areas of life that we might like to pursue.
ST: Once you decided to commit yourself to this work, where did you go?
PP: The opportunities were not huge. There were rape crisis centers and domestic violence shelters, but there was no funding for them. Then, in 1980, President Reagan signed into law the rape crisis services and rape prevention program that contained federal funds designated for rape crisis centers. That helped open up the field for more people to be employed, including me.
ST: Tell me about the early days of your work on sexual violence. What were the challenges?
PP: Well, if we didn’t have bona fide physical evidence that could somehow substantiate the woman’s report of rape, then there was going to be no support for–and no response to–a rape victim by law enforcement and the criminal justice system. In the early days of my work, many of the women coming forward were sexually abused as children or as young teenagers and, now, decades later, were coming forward to get help from us and to tell us what had happened to them. As there became more permission for women to report rape and as women realized they could get the support of victim advocates and have some community back-up, more women came forward in the immediate moments after a rape. There was growing focus on what physical evidence existed in order to go forward with a case. Women began to believe they could report a rape right after it happened when there would still be physical evidence that could be used at trial.
ST: I have been doing some research lately on the origins of rape kit examinations in the United States and I learned that Illinois is considered the birthplace of the rape kit. Was it around this time that the rape kit started to emerge as a good law enforcement tool?
PP: A victim’s rights advocate helped develop the kit with a detective in or around 1975-1976. Before the rape kit existed, there was very little physical evidence collected from rape cases—or, if it was collected, it was not always as useful as it needed to be. There were storage issues and contamination issues and inconsistency in analysis. It was a bit of a mess.
The importance of the rape kit rose as reporting rates increased and more victims came forward right after a rape occurred. In the mid 80s, an investigative reporter in Chicago discovered that police were hoarding rape kits in the trunks of police officers’ cars. The kits never even made it to the police station. These kits had been collected and because there was never any pursuit of the investigation, the officers never took the kits to the station or the lab. That story opened the floodgates to talk about the significance of rape kits, the lack of law enforcement compliance in delivering the kits to the lab and the role of state’s attorneys’ offices who too infrequently requested lab results from the kits.
Since the first rape kit was introduced, we have constantly made tweaks and improvements as our knowledge base increases about what works and what doesn’t for victims and for evidentiary value. We worked hard to improve the emergency room response by doing training with hospitals and law enforcement. We tried to bridge the relationship between cops and hospitals so they would communicate better with one another.
ST: Why was the forensic piece so important to get right?
PP: As to the crime of rape, our society does not believe women simply based on their word. So, especially in those years before the rape laws were changed, we really, really needed corroborating physical evidence in order to get a prosecutor to take the case. We needed to have evidence to substantiate the woman’s testimony of what happened to her because, unfortunately, her word alone was not enough. The reality was we needed evidence to bolster a woman’s credibility that she was telling the truth about the rape. Quite honestly, so much of making a criminal case depended on the emergency room personnel who documented the victim’s condition when she came in—the bruises, the broken bones. All of this was in addition to the rape kit collection, and together, it lent credibility to the woman’s story. And in cases when a victim was afraid to tell anyone about the abuse, effective and compassionate care in the emergency room helped to encourage the victim to report the crime. Forensic evidence also made it more difficult for the police to deny that the abuse occurred.
ST: I recently read that of the 4,100 untested rape kits in Illinois police storage facilities, the oldest one was from 1978. Would you talk about the difference between what a woman reporting in 1978 and having a rape kit collected would experience and what a woman today experiences?
PP: In 1978, a victim would be fortunate if she got herself to an emergency room. It wasn’t as widely known that a woman could get help, so it was even more rare then for a woman to come forward to report the crime or get medical help. The process of the rape kit exam was, and continues to be, a pretty arduous experience, although that has certainly improved through sexual assault nurse examiners who are trained to do the exam as efficiently and compassionately as possible. Thirty years ago, many women went to the ER to get care because of a fear of pregnancy and many of them didn’t even necessarily want to report rape to police. The cultural bias against rape victims told a victim that she was probably not going to get the support she needed and that the assailant would never be apprehended. There was very little incentive to report rape. A woman went to ERs for care, not for evidence collection, so the woman getting a rape kit collected in 1978 was especially brave.
Also, back in 1978, we didn’t have as much information about the prevalence of rape. There was no data. It wasn’t until Illinois required emergency rooms to report to law enforcement that a victim had presented to the hospital for a rape (leaving out the victim’s name or address). And then we required law enforcement to publicly report the number of rapes reported to them. In areas where law enforcement developed a good relationship with emergency rooms, police would start to come to the emergency room to gather information from the victim and about the assailant. It gave police the opportunity to witness firsthand the severity of the assault.  Some police continued to use the ER visit as a time to determine if they believed the victim. It was so important as this practice developed to make certain that victim advocates were present to serve as a buffer of protection for the victim and work with law enforcement and emergency room personnel on her behalf.
Back in 1978, the definition of rape was very narrow. The victim had to be 14 or older, could not be the assailant’s spouse and the sex had to be sexual penetration by force. This narrow definition of rape in the law told the victim that if she did not meet the law’s definition of rape, then she was not a rape victim.
As we started to get some data on the prevalence of rape and how many different types of rape that were beyond the law’s definition of rape, we started to focus on how to get the law to better address the broad spectrum of rape.
ST: How do you think it helped to have an improved emergency room response?
PP: It helped get victims the care they needed to put their life back together again. It is my belief that victims need an immediate sense of recovery in order to reestablish their lives. I think that when we get an institution to respond well to the crime of rape, it’s useful in responding to the victim, but it also helps to address the impact of the crime on the community and helps preserve the physical and emotional integrity of the victim. And we cannot underestimate the role the advocate plays at the emergency room as she brings compassion and care to the victim during what are probably some of the worst moments of her life.
ST: And how has this improved training empowered victims?
PP: Hospitals and law enforcement now know that rape victims get to determine their care and the direction that care takes and that victims are free to determine how much care they want. This lets victims know that they are taking control of their lives and the process following rape; they are then better prepared to be a witness and better prepared to be a critical part of the criminal case. When professional care improves, victims want to be more engaged in the system.
ST: There are so many aspects to an improved criminal justice response. Let’s talk for a moment specifically about DNA and how that is useful in moving more cases forward.
PP: We think of DNA as being most useful when the assailant is a stranger, at least in terms of solving that individual case. And that is probably true. But I think that if you are not testing all rape kits–even in non-stranger cases–and not gathering the evidence that those kits provide, then you are dismissing what can be the most critical factor in the jury’s opinion. The more physical evidence and scientific evidence you provide them, the more useful it is. And it is incredibly helpful in interrupting the rape from occurring again, especially since serial rapists are often non-stranger rapists as well as stranger rapists. So I think it’s essential that we make sure that we are using all the tools we have to hold offenders accountable and DNA is a huge part in doing so.
I believe Illinois is making huge strides in terms of rape kit testing—and a lot of those strides happened because of the courage of victims to come forward and say, “I don’t think my rape kit was tested.” Everyone has to follow the law and we have a new law that says we need to collect rape kit evidence and that the evidence will be tested. You cannot have untested or unaccounted rape kits anymore in this state without now breaking the law. So, by mandating by law that every rape kit is tested, it sends the message that rape kit testing is serious—so serious there is a law mandating it—and that we take rape seriously. It is that kind of adherence to the law that creates a cultural understanding that this is serious, violent behavior and we are taking it seriously and we will handle testing with the utmost responsibility.
When people see that discretionary decisions are being made case by case regarding rape kit testing, or when testing is based on an individual police officer’s subjective beliefs about the case, then people see that it’s arbitrary, that it isn’t law at all, it’s based on whoever is in charge of the particular case or incident. That is a message to rape victims that, “this is not going to go well for me if I report. It’s going to be arbitrary about whether I am believed or not and I don’t know if reporting is worth it.” Institutions have a responsibility to provide standardization, uniformity, fairness and consistency in their responsibilities and once that is undermined and certain people are given passes and excuses, faith in those institutions is diminished.
ST: Let’s go back to the rape kit backlog. Talk to me about the latest developments in Illinois.
PP: There was a report just released by the Illinois State Police that found 4,100 untested kitsinventoried in 379 different law enforcement agencies. Now that we have inventoried these kits, we know what we are dealing with in terms of our rape kit backlog. The best that is going to come out of this is that we will all collaborate and come to a common understanding that the implementation of law leads to successful investigations, increased safety of communities and hopefully justice for the victim.  We will start to see the value of stretching ourselves to create laws and implement laws that bring about justice and hopefully the prevention of rape.
I would like to think that the effort to end the rape kit backlog will result in a victim knowing that she or he will be believed and there is a system in place that will do its very best to bring justice to her or him. If, as a culture, we can ensure our citizens that if you reach out for help, you will be believed that you need help, and if we say to an assailant that they will be held accountable for violating someone’s sense of sexual safety, we will be more trusting of one another and our institutions.  Maybe then, we can live in community.

_________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE

Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

_________________________________________________________________________________


"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." –– Margaret Mead


_________________________________________________________________________________