Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Friday, November 13, 2009

Just doing the right thing

Just doing the right thing
by Michael J. Salamon 
The Awareness Center's Daily Newsletter - November 13, 2009
Early one Shabbos not that many years ago, a car accident took place just outside a shul. The 300-family congregation had just started services when they heard the loud boom of a car and truck colliding. Several shul members ran outside to see if they could help. The rabbi of the congregation waited a few minutes and he too walked out for a moment to see if he could be of assistance. Fortunately, no one was seriously injured. The truck could be driven and after the police took their report, the truck driver drove off. The car on the other hand, was destroyed. The rabbi asked the man who had been driving it if he needed any help and invited him inside the shul. The driver accepted, seeking a warm, comfortable place to calm down following the accident and wait for whatever help would be coming. Once inside the rabbi asked the man if he was Jewish. He was. The rabbi then asked if he would like to say Birkat Hagomel, the Blessing of Thanks for surviving a dangerous situation. The driver agreed and did so. What was surprising to people who were not members of the shul was not that the rabbi would welcome someone into the congregation — the rabbi was known for his warmth, friendship and genuine caring for others — but that he would do so on a Shabbat. Several weeks after the incident a member of the community, somewhat perplexed by what had transpired, asked the rabbi about his decision, to which he responded simply, “It is the right thing to do.”
The punch line for the story is not that the driver of the car, as a sign of gratitude, made a large donation, nor that he himself became religious, moved and joined the shul, or that he decided to send his children to a yeshiva. As far as I know, none of those things happened. The moral of the story is the austere fact that the rabbi did the right thing. He did not shun the man, ignore him or demand a specific behavior of him. He provided him some cordiality and the man felt calmer: a small but important attempt to make the world a nicer place.
I wonder lately where this “pay it forward” approach to life has gone. Some believe that we are all narcissists and as narcissists we believe in our own selfish infallibility. According to Doctors Jean Twenge and Keith Campbell, one of the common pitfalls of current society is that we have allowed ourselves to become so insistent that our way is the only correct one that we license ourselves to impose our demands on others. As they point out in their text “The Narcissism Epidemic,” we live in an “Age of entitlement.” This sense of privilege is so pervasive, not limited at all to individuals or certain ethnic or religious groups, that some truly believe they have the right to impose their beliefs, even private religious beliefs, on other people. Not everyone acts this way — most people do not — but those who do, attempt to impose their unique views on others by placing a tremendous burden on them. Whether it be demanding from others how one should dress through the use of “chastity squads,” to sanctioning or even rioting against those who report child abuse to the proper authorities, the question of whether a parking lot should be opened on Shabbat, even to threatening boycotts if a Zionist rabbi is elected in Jerusalem — these have no longer become topics for discussion but of intimidation. I personally would like to see less, or even no, traffic on Shabbat in Jerusalem, but I find it distasteful to employ rioting as a means to accomplish it. I do not mind, and even encourage, if people choose to dress modestly but as Rabbi Yehuda Henkin shows in his book “Understanding Tzniut,” rules for modesty are subject to differing interpretations in various communities. Randomly imposing dress codes is simply rude and destructive. The most competent rabbi should be selected for a position, not as a result of blackmail, and abuse must be dealt with properly.
It is not an easy task to teach someone with a hyper-inflated sense of superiority how to value others or even concede to another’s opinion. Psychotherapeutic treatments for narcissism acknowledge an individual’s egotistic sense of self-importance, while limiting any acknowledgement of their own grandiosity. This approach is thought to help the person to begin to see the world from a perspective beyond their own. Socially, however, this is significantly more difficult, because acknowledgement on any level becomes viewed as public acceptance. The more reinforcement given publicly, the more justified the movement begins to feel. Herein lays both the problem as well as the solution.
The recent visit by the Toldos Avrohom Yitzchok and Toldos Aharon rebbeim forces us to confront this issue very directly. We are, in a very real sense, required to help our brethren and co-religionists, but to what degree and for what intent? What is the right thing to do when it comes to situations in which we have major disagreements?
There are two aspects to this issue that must be acknowledged. The first is that at least some positions taken by people we disagree with are reasonable and perhaps even accurate. For example, it would be better if Shabbat were observed more properly. The other side, though, is that we cannot allow ourselves to be intimidated. The real problem is where and how to draw the line between a small-minded worldview determined to impose a rigid singular position, on the one hand — while simultaneously but absolutely demanding tolerance and understanding for all on the other.
From a psychological perspective the best way to deal with this issue is to marginalize only the self-important stone throwers and not generalize their ideology of aggressiveness to all who may look like them. Violence tends to act as a negative reinforcer and we do not want to encourage violence. If a child is repeatedly hit by a parent we find that the child’s behavior only worsens. The child has learned that this is an effective way to get a reaction, albeit a negative one. Ignoring also does not work. What does work is ignoring minor issues while, at the same time, broadly opening channels for communication that are predicated on understanding and developing respect toward one another. Ben Zoma said, “Who is wise? Someone who learns from every person.” With this as our guide we will find it easier to simply find the right thing to do.
Dr. Salamon, a Fellow of the American Psychological Association, is the founder and director of ADC Psychological Services in Hewlett, NY and a Board member of The Awareness Center. He is the author of numerous articles and several psychological tests. His recent books include, The Shidduch Crisis: Causes and Cures, published by Urim Publications and Every Pot Has a Cover: A Proven Guide to Finding, Keeping and Enhancing the Ideal Relationship, published by Rowman & Littlefield. His new book on Abuse will be available March, 2011.

Tuesday, March 22, 2005

Lost in the Shuffle: Survivors of Sexual Victimization

Lost in the Shuffle: Survivors of Sexual Victimization
© (2005) By Vicki Polin, MA, LCPC, NCC
 
It's so easy for survivors of sexual violence to get "Lost in the Shuffle". There so many different levels this can happen. I don't even know where to begin. 

Let me get started by telling you about a discussion a dear friend of mine had with her 12 year old daughter, Rochel. 

The reason why this is so funny, is because my friend is more then just aware about the political climate everyone associated with The Awareness Center works, and about my own personal pet peeve regarding the term "expert". 

It seems that every time someone has told me "they were an expert" on a particular subject related to sexual violence, and continue on by telling me I should "trust them" because they are such an expert -- it has always been a huge red flag, to run as far away from them as I can. 

Let me warn you that I am very opinionated when it comes to this world. I'm also aware not everyone will respond the way I do. 

My experience has been that the majority of the times a person has appointed themselves as an expert -- it has meant they stop learning, appeared to be close minded, and unable to hearing other peoples perspectives. 

I have no problem with someone telling me that they have a great deal of experience in an area, but when someone calls themselves an "Expert" to describe themselves, especially when dealing with victimization issues, I run and suggested to others they do the same. I also make sure to tell survivors that they are the only true "expert" of their lives, and ultimately they hold the key to what will help them heal. 

You have to understand, that choice has been taken away from someone who has been sexually violated. They need to learn or relearn to trust their own judgment. Going to someone who is a self-appointed expert, often takes choice away from the survivor. 

Believe it or not; Being a victim advocate means you have to deal with some pretty ugly political situations. Believe me, not everyone will agree with your perspective in how to handle various cases or situations. 

Keeping everything I've just said in mind, here is the wisdom of Rochel, the fifteen year old teenager.
The discussion Rochel had with her mother was on the mean of two words. "Expert" and "Politics". 

Expert
An "Ex" is has been
Spurt means A drip under pressure
therefore an Expert is a Has Been, drip under pressure.
 
Politics
Poly means Many
Ticks are blood sucking creatures
therefore Politics means Many blood sucking creatures
 
Did you ever stop to think, who in their right mind would want to spend time talking about rape? incest? other forms of childhood sexual abuse? or how about the popular topic of Rabbinical Sexual Misconduct? I'm sure you can think of a zillion other things to occupy your mind and discuss with friends that wouldn't evoke the same emotions these topics do. 

I keep thinking back to about a month ago (February, 2005). The headlines in the news were about the Academy Awards. This wasn't just on a local level, it happened internationally (It was on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, BCC, etc.). Almost everyone was talking about WHO was going to get nominated for an Oscar. 

Once the nominations were announced, the topic of discussion swiftly changed to: What each of the celebrities were going to wear

Stop and think about it. How many thousands of dollars (if not millions if you add in the jewelry) were spent on the wardrobes of each individual celebrity, remember this was for just one evening? Can we even begin to compare that amount money to how many dollars are spent on helping each individual survivor of sexual violence over a lifetime? 

Things like this always get me thinking. What are the Academy Awards really about? One perspective might be that it's a group of people from various related professions, getting together to honor each other, for a job well done. Many of the nominee's and winners are basically getting honored for pretending they are other people. This idea worked out so well that they decided to repeat it once a year for the last 77 years. 

I've worked with many survivors over the years who also have the talent of being other people. It's not really pretending, in the survivor world they call it dissociation. It's a a coping mechanism. Not one of them have ever gotten an award for this talent. 

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the world recognize what they are doing and start honoring survivors of sexual abuse or assault and also those who are supportive of them (i.e. parents, spouses, friends)?
Let's take this a step further. I don't know if you heard about the "goodie-boxes that those who were nominated to get an Oscar received? These party favors included also sorts of elaborate gifts: 

Top of the line cell phones, camera's, designer clothing, diamond jewelry, video games, stays at exclusive spa resorts -- the list goes on and on. I read some where that in 2003 the "goodie-bags were worth over $20,000.00 a piece, some even much more. 

Remember these gifts were given to those who were just nominees. Can you imagine the gifts that the winners got? 

Now let's change things around a bit. You were sexually abused as a child. You told someone who believed you, and they helped you get the help you needed. 

The odds are you spent a few years in therapy, working through all sorts of things. 

The Academy learned of your bravery and nominated you as "survivor of the year". Can you imagine the incentive to heal if you knew you might be able to get one of those "goodie boxes"? 

Some might feel that receiving one of these gifts is the worlds way of thanking you for developing the coping mechanism you needed to survive, and thanking you for taking the time out to heal.
We can't forget one of the most important aspects of being nominated, and then having your name announced as the winner. 

I want you to imagine what it would be like for you to walk into a room, and everyone stands up and gives you a round of applauds for a job well done? You are honored and respected, just for being you. 

You being honored because:
You are part of The Few,
The Proud
You are part of the solution
You are a Rape Victim Advocate and/or a Survivor of Sexual Violence. 

They want to thank you for being brave enough to "break the Taboo" by being alive, thank you for being willing to educate others and/or just talking about Sexual Violence in Jewish Communities around the word. 

When I was a child, my friends and I would play a game called "Let's pretend". So I'm going to ask you to play along with me. 

Let's pretend you were walking down the street, and two men came up behind you, pointed a gun at you and said, give me all of your money -- or I'll kill you. You complied, pulled out your wallet and gave it to them. They ran away. Leaving you standing on the street, shaking. 

What would be the first thing you would do? 

If you are like most people, you would most likely call the police; and give them all the details you had. 

Then you might call everyone you know, and tell them about what happened to you. For the next week or two it might be the only thing you could think about. 

Because everyone you told was supportive of you, the trauma slowly fades into your memory.
Now let's say, you're about seven. Your parents went out, and your baby-sitter came into your room, and took all the money in your piggy bank. They told you if you told anyone, bad things would happen to you and/or family members. The next day when your mother woke you up to go to school, would you tell her about the robbery?
  • If not, how long would it take before you told anyone?
  • When you finally did tell someone, who would it be?
  • How do you think that person would respond?
  • Do you think they would believe you?
  • If they didn't believe you, would you tell anyone else?
All too often when someone has been sexually abused or assaulted, they feel a great deal of shame. They have also been robbed of something. 

Unfortunately in our society it's not socially acceptable to say "Hi my name is Steve, and I'm an incest survivor". This reality has got to change if we want our communities to heal.

All too often survivors have been made to feel their victimization was their own fault. This is far from the truth. We need to educate our communities that a survivor of sexual abuse/assault should be treated the same way you would treat someone who was robbed on the street.

One of our biggest problems we have, is that our communities don't have the education they need to understand the issues and ramifications sexual violence plays on it's victims. 

We need to demand that this be changed. The resources our out there, yet our community leaders have been afraid to utilize or learn from them. 

We as victim advocates have a responsibility to insure there be a public outcry for change.