Case of Heath Colwyn

Case of Heath Colwyn

Electrical Engineer - Ainsdale, England

Liverpool, England

Former Jewish Lads’ and Girls’ Brigade member 

Plead guilty to 26 offences of making indecent images of children and five of distributing them.  

Police went to Colwyn's home on March 22, 2005 they seized two laptop computers and 21 floppy discs. When these were analysed officers found a total of 488 indecent images of children aged between about nine to 15 years.

Geoffrey Greenwood, prosecuting, told Liverpool Crown Court that 277 of the images were in the lowest category of such images but there were 89 in the serious category involving sex with adults.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:

2007 

1. Shul-goer gets jail for 26 child porn offences (08/11/2007)
2. A 33-year-old family man who downloaded child porn from the internet was today (Mon) jailed for nine months  (11/05/2007)
3. Family man jailed for downloading child porn  (11/06/2007)
4. Man jailed for web child porn offences (11/06/2007)

 

 ____________________________________________________________________________________

Shul-goer gets jail for 26 child porn offences By Nathan Jeffay

The Jewish Chronicle - August 11, 2007

V Southport’s Jewish community was in shock this week after a regular Reform Synagogue congregant was jailed for nine months for downloading and distributing child pornography.

Heath Colwyn, 33, was sentenced on Monday at Liverpool Crown Court, where he had pleaded guilty to 26 offences of making indecent images of children and five of distributing them.

The court was told that police seized two laptops and 21 floppy discs from the home of Colwyn in March 2005. They were found to contain 488 indecent images of children aged from about nine to 15. Eighty-nine were in the serious category involving sex with adults.

One of the laptops contained emails showing that the electrical engineer had distributed images to others in the UK.

Colwyn’s barrister, Andrew Loveridge, pointed out that he had no similar previous convictions and denied that his behaviour had been sexually motivated.

However, Judge David Aubrey, QC, found this “difficult to accept”, and, passing sentence, told the court that viewing such images perpetuated child abuse. The court was told that Colwyn’s wife was standing by him. The couple have a three-year-old son.

Colwyn, who in his younger days was an enthusiastic Jewish Lads’ and Girls’ Brigade member, was said by a fellow Southport Reform congregant to have “an unblemished record in the community”, where his family is long established and well regarded. “There is nothing in his past to account for what happened.”

Emeritus minister Rabbi Sydney Kay told the JC that Colwyn would remain welcome at services and community events when released, and was “amazed” that anyone would think otherwise. “A synagogue is a synagogue and as such accepts every Jew as a Jew.”

Referring to the decision taken earlier this year by Stanmore Synagogue to ban indefinitely a convicted sex offender , Andrew Josephs, Rabbi Kay said: “Stanmore is Stanmore, Southport is Southport. If someone has served his punishment, as the Torah says, the judge draws him close and calls him brother.”

Any concerns by young families would be dealt with and could not influence the decision, as “I am guided by the Torah”.

The Reform congregation has around 120 adult members and 20 children at its cheder.

JLGB chief executive Neil Martin said Colwyn had been a member up to the age of 18 or 20, and “may have been our most junior type of young leader. But had there been any cause for suspicion, we would have acted.”

____________________________________________________________________________________

A 33-year-old family man who downloaded child porn from the internet was today (Mon) jailed for nine months

Champion News - November 5, 2007

Heath Colwyn was arrested after police investigating a West Midlands man discovered that he had sent images to Colwyn.

When police went to Colwyn's home on March 22, 2005 they seized two laptop computers and 21 floppy discs. When these were analysed officers found a total of 488 indecent images of children aged between about nine to 15 years.

Geoffrey Greenwood, prosecuting, told Liverpool Crown Court that 277 of the images were in the lowest category of such images but there were 89 in the serious category involving sex with adults.

On one of the laptops they found emails showing that he had distributed images to other similar minded people in the UK.

Colwyn, of Cornwall Way, Ainsdale, pleaded guilty to 26 offences of  making indecent images of children and five of distributing them.

His barrister, Andrew Loveridge, said that Colwyn, who has no similar previous convictions, denied his behaviour had been sexually motived.

But jailing him Judge David Aubrey, QC, said he found that "difficult to accept."

He pointed out that viewing such images perpetuates child abuse. Mr Loveridge said that Colwyn committed the offences because he felt isolated. His wife, with whom he has a three-year-old son, is standing by him.

He pointed out that the offences committed by Colwyn, who works as an electrical engineer, happened two and a half years ago.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Family man jailed for downloading child porn

Liverpool Daily Post - November 6, 2007

A FAMILY man who downloaded child porn from the internet was jailed for nine months yesterday.

Heath Colwyn, 33, was arrested after police investigating a West Midlands man discovered he had sent images to Colwyn. 

When police went to Colwyn's home on March 22, 2005, they seized two laptop computers and 21 floppy disks. When these were analysed officers found of 488 indecent images of children aged from about nine to 15. 

Geoffrey Greenwood, prosecuting, told Liverpool Crown Court that 277 of the images were in the lowest category of such images, but there were 89 in the serious category involving sex with adults.

On one of the laptops they found emails showing he had distributed images to other similar minded people in the UK. 

Colwyn, of Cornwall Way, Ainsdale, pleaded guilty to 26 offences of making indecent images of children and five of distributing them. His barrister, Andrew Loveridge, said Colwyn, who has no similar previous convictions, denied his behaviour had been sexually motived. 

But jailing him Judge David Aubrey, QC, said he found that "difficult to accept." He said viewing such images perpetuated child abuse. Mr Loveridge said Colwyn committed the offences because he felt isolated. His wife, with whom he has a three-year-old son, is standing by him. 

He said the offences committed by Colwyn, an electrical engineer, happened 2 1/2 years ago.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Man jailed for web child porn offences
Liverpool Echo - November 6, 2007

A 33-year-old family man who downloaded child porn from the internet was jailed for nine months. 

Heath Colwyn was arrested after police investigating a West Midlands man discovered that he had sent images to Colwyn. 

When they went to Col-wyn's home they seized two laptop computers and 21 floppy discs which, when analysed held a total of 488 indecent images of children aged between about nine to 15 years.
Geoffrey Greenwood, prosecuting, told Liverpool crown court that 277 images were in the lowest category but that 89 were in the serious category. 

Colwyn, of Cornwall Way, Ainsdale, pleaded guilty to 26 offences of making indecent images of children and five of distributing them. 

His barrister, Andrew Loveridge, said Colwyn denied his behaviour had been sexually motived.
But Judge David Aubrey QC, said he found that "difficult to accept".

____________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE

 
Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

____________________________________________________________________________________

Lost in the Shuffle: Survivors of Sexual Victimization

Lost in the Shuffle: Survivors of Sexual Victimization
© (2005) By Vicki Polin, MA, LCPC, NCC

 

It's so easy for survivors of sexual violence to get "Lost in the Shuffle". There so many different levels this can happen. I don't even know where to begin. 

Let me get started by telling you about a discussion a dear friend of mine had with her 12 year old daughter, Rochel. 

The reason why this is so funny, is because my friend is more then just aware about the political climate everyone associated with The Awareness Center works, and about my own personal pet peeve regarding the term "expert". 

It seems that every time someone has told me "they were an expert" on a particular subject related to sexual violence, and continue on by telling me I should "trust them" because they are such an expert -- it has always been a huge red flag, to run as far away from them as I can. 

Let me warn you that I am very opinionated when it comes to this world. I'm also aware not everyone will respond the way I do. 

My experience has been that the majority of the times a person has appointed themselves as an expert -- it has meant they stop learning, appeared to be close minded, and unable to hearing other peoples perspectives. 

I have no problem with someone telling me that they have a great deal of experience in an area, but when someone calls themselves an "Expert" to describe themselves, especially when dealing with victimization issues, I run and suggested to others they do the same. I also make sure to tell survivors that they are the only true "expert" of their lives, and ultimately they hold the key to what will help them heal. 

You have to understand, that choice has been taken away from someone who has been sexually violated. They need to learn or relearn to trust their own judgment. Going to someone who is a self-appointed expert, often takes choice away from the survivor. 

Believe it or not; Being a victim advocate means you have to deal with some pretty ugly political situations. Believe me, not everyone will agree with your perspective in how to handle various cases or situations. 

Keeping everything I've just said in mind, here is the wisdom of Rochel, the fifteen year old teenager.

The discussion Rochel had with her mother was on the mean of two words. "Expert" and "Politics". 

Expert

An "Ex" is has been

Spurt means A drip under pressure

therefore an Expert is a Has Been, drip under pressure.

 

Politics

Poly means Many

Ticks are blood sucking creatures

therefore Politics means Many blood sucking creatures

 

Did you ever stop to think, who in their right mind would want to spend time talking about rape? incest? other forms of childhood sexual abuse? or how about the popular topic of Rabbinical Sexual Misconduct? I'm sure you can think of a zillion other things to occupy your mind and discuss with friends that wouldn't evoke the same emotions these topics do. 

I keep thinking back to about a month ago (February, 2005). The headlines in the news were about the Academy Awards. This wasn't just on a local level, it happened internationally (It was on ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, BCC, etc.). Almost everyone was talking about WHO was going to get nominated for an Oscar. 

Once the nominations were announced, the topic of discussion swiftly changed to: What each of the celebrities were going to wear. 

Stop and think about it. How many thousands of dollars (if not millions if you add in the jewelry) were spent on the wardrobes of each individual celebrity, remember this was for just one evening? Can we even begin to compare that amount money to how many dollars are spent on helping each individual survivor of sexual violence over a lifetime? 

Things like this always get me thinking. What are the Academy Awards really about? One perspective might be that it's a group of people from various related professions, getting together to honor each other, for a job well done. Many of the nominee's and winners are basically getting honored for pretending they are other people. This idea worked out so well that they decided to repeat it once a year for the last 77 years. 

I've worked with many survivors over the years who also have the talent of being other people. It's not really pretending, in the survivor world they call it dissociation. It's a a coping mechanism. Not one of them have ever gotten an award for this talent. 

Wouldn't it be wonderful if the world recognize what they are doing and start honoring survivors of sexual abuse or assault and also those who are supportive of them (i.e. parents, spouses, friends)?

Let's take this a step further. I don't know if you heard about the "goodie-boxes that those who were nominated to get an Oscar received? These party favors included also sorts of elaborate gifts: 

Top of the line cell phones, camera's, designer clothing, diamond jewelry, video games, stays at exclusive spa resorts -- the list goes on and on. I read some where that in 2003 the "goodie-bags were worth over $20,000.00 a piece, some even much more. 

Remember these gifts were given to those who were just nominees. Can you imagine the gifts that the winners got? 

Now let's change things around a bit. You were sexually abused as a child. You told someone who believed you, and they helped you get the help you needed. 

The odds are you spent a few years in therapy, working through all sorts of things. 

The Academy learned of your bravery and nominated you as "survivor of the year". Can you imagine the incentive to heal if you knew you might be able to get one of those "goodie boxes"? 

Some might feel that receiving one of these gifts is the worlds way of thanking you for developing the coping mechanism you needed to survive, and thanking you for taking the time out to heal.

We can't forget one of the most important aspects of being nominated, and then having your name announced as the winner. 

I want you to imagine what it would be like for you to walk into a room, and everyone stands up and gives you a round of applauds for a job well done? You are honored and respected, just for being you. 

You being honored because:

You are part of The Few,

The Proud

You are part of the solution

You are a Rape Victim Advocate and/or a Survivor of Sexual Violence. 

They want to thank you for being brave enough to "break the Taboo" by being alive, thank you for being willing to educate others and/or just talking about Sexual Violence in Jewish Communities around the word. 

When I was a child, my friends and I would play a game called "Let's pretend". So I'm going to ask you to play along with me. 

Let's pretend you were walking down the street, and two men came up behind you, pointed a gun at you and said, give me all of your money -- or I'll kill you. You complied, pulled out your wallet and gave it to them. They ran away. Leaving you standing on the street, shaking. 

What would be the first thing you would do? 

If you are like most people, you would most likely call the police; and give them all the details you had. 

Then you might call everyone you know, and tell them about what happened to you. For the next week or two it might be the only thing you could think about. 

Because everyone you told was supportive of you, the trauma slowly fades into your memory.

Now let's say, you're about seven. Your parents went out, and your baby-sitter came into your room, and took all the money in your piggy bank. They told you if you told anyone, bad things would happen to you and/or family members. The next day when your mother woke you up to go to school, would you tell her about the robbery?

• If not, how long would it take before you told anyone?
• When you finally did tell someone, who would it be?
• How do you think that person would respond?
• Do you think they would believe you?
• If they didn't believe you, would you tell anyone else?

All too often when someone has been sexually abused or assaulted, they feel a great deal of shame. They have also been robbed of something. 

Unfortunately in our society it's not socially acceptable to say "Hi my name is Steve, and I'm an incest survivor". This reality has got to change if we want our communities to heal.

All too often survivors have been made to feel their victimization was their own fault. This is far from the truth. We need to educate our communities that a survivor of sexual abuse/assault should be treated the same way you would treat someone who was robbed on the street.

One of our biggest problems we have, is that our communities don't have the education they need to understand the issues and ramifications sexual violence plays on it's victims. 

We need to demand that this be changed. The resources our out there, yet our community leaders have been afraid to utilize or learn from them. 

We as victim advocates have a responsibility to insure there be a public outcry for change.