Showing posts with label employer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label employer. Show all posts

Monday, January 09, 2006

Case of Ya'acov Agmon

Case of Ya'acov Agmon
Director, Habima Theater - Tel Aviv, Israel

Accused of sexually harassing a secretary who worked for him for two-and-a-half years with words and deeds, and of committing indecent acts against her on three separate occasions. The prosecution closed the file for lack of sufficient evidence.


____________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:  

  1. Harassment case against Habima director dropped  (01/09/2006)

____________________________________________________________________________________

Harassment case against Habima director dropped
By Dan Izenberg
Jerusalem Post - Jan. 9, 2006 21:30


The Tel Aviv District Attorney's Office for Criminal Affairs on Monday announced that it was closing the investigation file against Ya'acov Agmon, former director of Tel Aviv's Habima Theater.

Agmon was under investigation after a secretary who worked for him for two-and-a-half years accused him of harassing her with words and deeds, and of committing indecent acts against her on three separate occasions.

The prosecution closed the file for lack of sufficient evidence.


____________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE
 
Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


____________________________________________________________________________________

Monday, September 12, 2005

Case of Colonel Atef Zahar

Case of Colonel Atef Zahar
(AKA: Col. Atef Zahar)


Former Colonel - Israeli Defense Force (IDF), Tel Aviv, Israel

Convicted of indecent sexual acts and illegal intercourse, and was acquitted of the crime of rape. He was sentenced to six years in prison for the rapes.

The court ruled that on many occasions Zaher took soldier M., his 18-year-old secretary (who was his direct subordinate) into various places, undressed her and himself, and penetrated her body while cursing, humiliating and insulting her. On a number of other occasions he undressed her and himself, held her by force and committed sexual acts on himself until he achieved climax, demanding that she watch him and cursing her when she refused to accede.

There are several people who go by the name of Atef Zahar. The individual discussed on this page was a former Colonel in the Israel Defense Force.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:  

2005
  1. IDF colonel on trail for raping soldier says she initiated intimate contact (06/15/2005)
  2. What could the soldier-girl have done? (09/12/2005)
  3. IDF court imprisons, demotes colonel over sexual abuse (09/20/2005)
  4. Col. Zaher gets eight months in prison (09/20/2005)

2006
  1. Top IDF officer gets 6 years for rape (09/29/2006)

2007
  1. Court rejects appeal by officer convicted of rape (08/08/2007)
  2. Former colonel begins six year sentence for rape (07/25/2007)

2012
  1. IDF colonel who raped female soldier to be released 9 months early  (10/24/2012)
___________________________________________________________________________________

IDF colonel on trail for raping soldier says she initiated intimate contact
By Zvi Harel and Yuval Yoaz
Haaretz - June 15, 2005

IDF Col. Atef Zaher, on trial for allegations that he raped a woman soldier under his command, confirmed Wednesday that he and the soldier had touched each other in "intimate regions."

Zaher said that this occurred during the soldier's reserve duty, when they were in his car. He added that he stopped the car, and that the touching was reciprocal, mainly initiated by the female soldier.

Zaher also said that he had kissed her on the mouth and caressed her at a party held on her release from the army. According to Zaher, this contact was also initiated by the female soldier. He added that on this occasion, he got carried away. Despite this, he strongly denied charges that he raped her.

In response to a question posed by attorney Avigdor Feldman, Zaher said, "All that the woman soldier said is beyond imagination. We never had any sort of sexual relations."

Also Wednesday, Zaher said he believed he had been framed by Bedouin soldiers who bore a grudge against him.

The indictment, filed in January, details at least 14 instances of rape and a number of additional incidents in which Zaher attacked the female soldier, but did not force her to have full sexual relations.

The indictment also includes charges of various incidents in which Zaher stroked the thighs of the female soldier and another soldier from the unit.

According to the indictment, on one occasion, after being unable to undress the female soldier in his office, Zaher took his clothes off and masturbated in front of the soldier. Zaher was released to house arrest after the trial began.

In the year and a half prior to his arrest, Zaher, a resident of the village of Isfiya, served as head of the minorities unit in the General Staff's Human Resources department. Serving in this capacity, he was responsible for ties with Druze, Bedouin, Muslim, and Christian Arab soldiers and new recruits. Prior to that, he headed the Human Resources Planning Department in the Human Resources Reserve unit.


Zaher served in the Human Resources branch for the duration of his military service.

___________________________________________________________________________________

What could the soldier-girl have done?
By Rina Bar-Tal
Haaretz - September 12, 2005 Elul 8, 5765

Last Monday, Colonel Atef Zaher was found guilty of indecent sexual acts and illegal intercourse, and was acquitted of the crime of rape. Zaher's defense attorney, Avigdor Feldman, said in a radio interview that had the story not gone out to the media, the defendant would have emerged without anything. There is no doubt that the media play an important role in leading social changes in Israel, but it is a long way from that to the conviction of Zaher for criminal acts.

Zaher's conviction will be credited to the courageous female soldier who complained (despite her introverted personality, as evidenced during the handing down of the verdict), testified, and decided to go through the process for the sake of her own justice and that of all women. In Zaher's conviction the court showed that it believed the plaintiff's testimony and determined that it was very reliable. However, the court negated the defendant's testimony and called it false and groundless. Because of his false testimony and the reliability of the plaintiff's, the military court convicted Colonel Zaher.

The court ruled that on many occasions Zaher took soldier M., his 18-year-old secretary (who was his direct subordinate) into various places, undressed her and himself, and penetrated her body while cursing, humiliating and insulting her. On a number of other occasions he undressed her and himself, held her by force and committed sexual acts on himself until he achieved climax, demanding that she watch him and cursing her when she refused to accede.

The court's decision is an enigma. In its ruling the court noted that the defendant had penetrated the plaintiff's body on many occasions, despite his statement, even after the verdict, that there had been no sexual relations between him and the plaintiff. The court further noted that the sexual relations with the defendant were abhorrent to the plaintiff and she had been sexually used by him because she had no alternative, because of the defendant's status and the fear he inspired in her.

And still there was no conviction of rape in Zaher's case. Why? Because according to the court, the plaintiff did not convince them that she resisted sufficiently to the acts attributed to the defendant. No torn items of clothing or other evidence of a physical struggle where found. However, this demand for physical resistance on the part of the plaintiff had already been eliminated by law in 2001 and is not required as proof of the crime of rape. And what could a soldier-girl of 18 have done? What resistance could she have manifested against the aggression of her direct superior, with the rank of colonel?

Examination of the extent of the plaintiff's resistance rather than the examination of the disgraceful and humiliating conduct of the defendant, and the granting of all the "weight" to the extent of the resistance, are no less puzzling. Such demands prevent many women from complaining in similar instances, on the grounds that they undergo another rape in the trial process.

MK Eti Livni (Shinui) has proposed legislation that would prohibit forced sex. The law was prepared and formulated by attorney Dr. Orit Kamir of the Israel Women's Network, the Association of Victims of Sexual Assault and the Israeli Center for Human Dignity. Under the proposal, a person who penetrates another person's body must ascertain in advance that the person is interested in this, and anyone who does not ascertain this and does not receive agreement is considered to not have received agreement and cannot defend himself later with the claim that he did not understand when the person who complains did not resist.

The meaning of this is that were this law already on the books, Zaher, who did not ask the plaintiff for her agreement, could not have argued later that "he did not know" that she didn't object to his actions - and would without a doubt have been convicted of rape.

___________________________________________________________________________________

IDF court imprisons, demotes colonel over sexual abuse
By Zvi Harel, Haaretz Correspondent
Haaretz - Sep. 20, 2005

A court martial on Tuesday sentenced Israel Defense Forces Colonel Atef Zaher to eight months for statutory rape and committing indecent sexual acts on a female soldier who served under his command. The court also demoted Zaher to the rank of a major and gave an additional suspended sentence of ten months' imprisonment.

Two weeks ago the court acquitted Zaher of rape charges.

The presiding judge Amnon Streshnov wrote in his verdict "the crimes were a systematic sexual abuse."

Outside the court Zaher gave an announcement to the press in which he insisted the allegations against him were false: "Never in my life did I hurt another human being," he said.

Relating to the treatment he received from the court, the convicted colonel said the he was warned that as soon as his name will be made public, dozens of other girls would file complaints against him. "Where are they?" he pondered.

"I object (to the verdict) and I am confident that in the end justice will come to light," the colonel stressed.

When asked what were his conclusions from the affair, Zaher said, "You must not believe every story a girl tells you. Those girls who they tell you are twenty years old are not innocent. There was something behind this," Zaher said, hinting that his conviction was a setup, but did not elaborate any more on the subject.

Zaher, 45, denied having had sexual relations with the complainant, though he testified that they had engaged on occasion in "touching intimate body parts" above clothing, and on two occasions hugged and kissed on the lips.

The affair was exposed by Israel Radio military reporter Carmela Menashe after a friend of the complainant's had contacted her.

Zahar served as commander of a small section in the personnel department of the IDF's General Staff. The complainant finished her military service in that section in February 2004, and Israel Radio exposed her complaints in December 2004.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Col. Zaher gets eight months in prison
By JPOST.COM STAFF
Jerusalem Post - Sep. 20, 2005

The Special Military Court in the Kirya (IDF headquarters) sentenced Col. Atef Zaher on Tuesday to eight months in prison and a 10-month suspended sentence.

The court also ruled that Zaher be demoted to the rank of major, two ranks below colonel, Army Radio reported.

In response to the sentence, Zaher said, "I will fight until my very last day. I am innocent – I did nothing. I am disappointed with the country I live in."

Two weeks ago Zaher was convicted on several counts of statutory rape against three female soldiers who had served under his command. The court, however, cleared Zaher of all rape and indecent acts charges.

The case has been dubbed the worst sexual assault case in the history of the IDF. It included the most severe charges ever brought against an IDF colonel.

The maximum punishment for each count of statutory rape is three years in prison.

Zaher was arrested by the Military Police in January following a covert investigation carried out after "M," a 20-year-old woman soldier, told Israel Radio that he had raped her several times over several months when she had served under his command.

The woman had taken a polygraph test and, according to media reports, had been found to be telling the truth.

Zaher vociferously denied all charges, claiming his relationship with "M" was based on love. "You are speaking of rape? I see it as love because she loved me," Zaher told the radio in February. "I did not have any sexual contact with her."


The officer's wife, Samia, has been backing her husband since the affair was revealed. "Anyone could do plenty in order to be promoted, including step all over my husband. But me and my husband will not allow that to happen," she said.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Top IDF officer gets 6 years for rape
Jerusalem Post - September 29, 2006

The Military Appeals Court at IDF headquarters in Tel Aviv sentenced Col. Atef Zahar to six years in prison Friday for rapin a female soldier who had served under his command. The court also ordered that Zaher be demoted to private and pay the victim NIS 35,000 in compensation, and rejected his request to submit an appeal to the Supreme Court. Nevertheless, Zahar's lawyer, Avigdor Feldman, announced that Atef intended to appeal to the Supreme Court. The judges, headed by court president Maj.-Gen. Yishai Bar, said Atef had "roughly trampled the complainant's body, turned her into a sex object, darkly used her innocence to satisfy his sexual urges." Zaher was accused last year of raping a 20-year-old woman identified as "M," and of sexually harassing other female soldiers between January 2003 and August 2004. In September 2005, he was convicted on five counts of illegal sexual intercourse, four counts of indecent behavior, attempted indecent behavior and conduct unbecoming an officer. Eight months earlier, Zaher was charged on 10 counts of rape as well as several related charges. However, he was acquitted of the rape charges at the September 2005 hearing after the court said prosecutors failed to prove the acts took place against the female soldier's will. 


___________________________________________________________________________________

Court rejects appeal by officer convicted of rape
Jerusalem Post - April 30, 2007

The Supreme Court rejected Monday an appeal filed by Col. Atef Zaher who was convicted of raping a female soldier under his command. Zaher was sentenced to six years in prison and demoted to the rank of private. In 2005, Zaher, 47, was charged with illegal sexual intercourse, indecent behavior, sexual harassment, and unbecoming behavior and sentenced to eight months in a military prison, a suspended 10-month sentence over a three-year period, and demoted to the rank of major. It was the first time a senior-ranking IDF officer was convicted in such a major case of sexual assault in the army.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Former colonel begins six year sentence for rape
Jerusalem Post - July 25, 2007

Private Atef Zahar, formerly Col. Zahar, will begin serving his six years prison sentence for raping a female soldier who had served under his command in the IDF on Wednesday morning, Israel Radio reported. In September 2005, Zahar was convicted on 10 counts of rape, five counts of indecent behavior and conduct unbecoming an officer. 

___________________________________________________________________________________

IDF colonel who raped female soldier to be released 9 months early

Ataf Zahar spent just over five years behind bars, never expressed remorse.

By Gili Cohen
Haaretz - October 24, 2012

Colonel Ataf Zahar, who was convicted of raping a female soldier under his command, is scheduled to be released from prison on Wednesday, nine months before his sentence was due to end.

The military prosecution objected to his release, noting that Zahar never expressed remorse for his actions and never apologized to the victim, who was a clerk under his command.

Attorney Liat Klein, the legal adviser for the Association of Rape Crisis Centers in Israel, said that "every decision regarding an early release has repercussions and significance for the victim. Unfortunately, the parole boards tend to focus their attention on the convict's situation, rather than examine the ramifications for the victim, the interest of society and the message to other sex criminals."

Zahar was convicted in 2006 by a military court at the Kirya headquarters in Tel Aviv of five counts of rape and indecent acts. He was sentenced to six years in prison and ordered to pay his victim NIS 35,000 in compensation. He was also demoted to the lowest rank of private.

Zahar, who headed the Israel Defense Forces' special populations authority, appealed the decision in 2007. His appeal was rejected.

But last week, the military parole board decided to commute his sentence by nine months.

Zahar has appeared three times before the parole board, which is composed of representatives of the military courts unit, the IDF's General Staff and the Defense Ministry. In his previous appeal, the parole board agreed to shorten his sentence by 18 months, but the Association of Rape Crisis Centers and the military prosecution petitioned the High Court of Justice to reverse the decision. The justices who dealt with the petition ruled that the military parole board had failed to weigh Zahar's desire for freedom against his victim's desire to rehabilitate her life.

The wording of the judges' verdict when Zahar was convicted in 2006 was particularly harsh. "The rapist's blow is so evil that it causes turmoil in the victim's most intimate spaces," it read.

"He boorishly, continuously and systematically trampled on the complainant's honor," the military judges wrote. "He harmed her soul and her body while humiliating and debasing her. Answering his urges was all that interested him, and he showed not a drop of compassion or mercy for the complainant."

Throughout his trial and incarceration, Zahar denied the charges and claimed that his only mistake was in holding a "forbidden romance." As such, he refused rehabilitation.

___________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE

Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
___________________________________________________________________________________

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." –– Margaret Mead
___________________________________________________________________________________


Tuesday, December 07, 2004

Case of David Weinberg


Case of David Weinberg

Former Hebrew Language Spokes Person  - Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel



Convicted of sexual harassment and indecent assault.

There are several people who go by the name of David Weinberg.  The individual mentioned on this page was born around 1962. 

_________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:  

2004
  1. Former Bar-Ilan spokesman convicted of sex crimes (12/07/2004) 
    • Letters to the Editor (12/10/2004)
      • Harmful behavior  By Jaffa Zilbershats
      • Misleading impression  By Tova Cohen
      • Legitimizing harassment  By Shira Katz
  2. Three months' probation and a fine (12/15/2004)
_________________________________________________________________________________

Former Bar-Ilan spokesman convicted of sex crimes
By Zvi Harel
Haaretz - December 07, 2004 (Kislev 24, 5765)

The Tel Aviv Magistrate's Court yesterday convicted former Bar-Ilan University spokesman David Weinberg of sexual harassment and indecent assault. Judge Ziva Hadasi-Herman handed him a suspended sentence of three months, payment of NIS 10,000 in damages to the victim and a fine of NIS 1,000.

The plaintiff in the case had worked for Weinberg, 42, as assistant to the Hebrew language spokesperson. In June 1998 the defendant had asked to make use of the shower in the home of a female colleague so that his employees could get ready for a yearly ceremony for the board of trustees of the university. After the plaintiff had taken a shower and dressed, the defendant approached her and placed his hands around her body, and complimented her on her appearance. On another occasion, in his office, in May 2000, the defendant stuffed a crumpled a piece of paper inside the plaintiff's shirt. In addition, between the years 1996 and 2000 the accused made several remarks of a sexual nature to the plaintiff.

Following the university's disciplinary hearing, Weinberg was demoted to a more junior position. Recently, during the court's concluding sessions, the defendant's attorney said Weinberg had been fired from the university.

Prosecutor Hadas Forer-Gafni requested a punishment based on public service and a suspended sentence, a fine and the payment of significant damages to the plaintiff.

The judge stated in the verdict that sexual harassment is a violation of human dignity and freedom.

The violation is all the more serious when the offender is in a position of power, which he uses to gain sexual benefits at the expense of a subordinate. The low fine of NIS 1,000 took into consideration the defendant's position as the breadwinner for six children, the judge explained.


_________________________________________________________________________________


Letters to the Editor
Haaretz Magazine - December 10, 2004

Harmful behavior
Regarding "Three months' probation and a fine," Haaretz Magazine, December 10

What I said in this article was meant to address the fundamental aspects of ways of implementing the law for the prevention of sexual harassment. Unfortunately, the impression was given that my position implies some kind of criticism or accusation against the victims of sexual harassment. This is not true.

On the contrary: I emphasized that the law did well to provide a variety of appropriate means and mechanisms for the immediate protection of women and men from harassment, and did not confine itself to the criminal plane, which by its nature necessitates long and complex processes. Unlike a disciplinary process, a criminal process cannot use "inappropriate behavior" as a sufficient cause to take action against the harasser and to penalize him. The criminal process requires an investigation, a complex examination of the evidence, a determination of the criminal intention in the perpetration of the act and other such qualifying and cautious measures - and in many cases it also requires full exposure of the victim before the accused.

Feminist-legal writing from the past decades has led to the recognition that the criminal process is often experienced by victims of sexual assault as yet a further assault. In light of this, Israeli law, like that in all enlightened countries, saw the need to strengthen the internal mechanisms and to leave the criminal process for those cases for which it is suited.

The experience accumulated since the legislation of this important law, including my personal experience in dealing with this harmful phenomenon, shows that ombudsmen, disciplinary committees and administrative processes have produced worthy results in protecting victims and punishing harassers, as long as they took firm and immediate action. Resolute disciplinary committees have brought about the firings and denunciations of harassers with justified effects on their status and salaries.

In my opinion, the legislature would do well to give more authorities to these mechanisms and to place greater responsibility on employers and the heads of institutions in uprooting this phenomenon. At the same time, I believe that the criminal handling of sexual harassment violations should be left intact, due to the profound seriousness of such crimes as set in the law and as an effective means of deterrence.

With the experience accumulated since this important law was enacted in 1998, its consequences should now be examined with the resolute intention of improving the ways of fighting this harmful behavior and uprooting it. And it would certainly behoove Haaretz Magazine to address this issue in depth.

Prof. Jaffa Zilbershats
Bar-Ilan University

_________________________________________________________________________________


Ramat Gan
Misleading impression

The brief paragraph dealing with my testimony at David Weinberg's trial is not false, but it gives a misleading impression in two ways. First, the phrase, "She stood by Weinberg," is correct, but only in a narrow sense: I testified as a "witness for the defense of Weinberg" because of my experience working with him. I testified that his behavior was always proper, respectful and in keeping with acceptable norms, and I continue to firmly believe that. At the same time, I in no way can express an opinion on the incident under discussion and either "stand by" or "stand against" Weinberg with respect to it.

Secondly, saying that I "could not be reached for comment" gives the impression that there was some sort of evasion on my part - perhaps out of "fear" or apprehension about making a "public statement," as the article described in connection with other female lecturers, and that is not the case. I presume that the reporter tried to reach me for comment sometime between December 2-5, when I was abroad.

Prof. Tova Cohen
Bar-Ilan University

_________________________________________________________________________________


Ramat Gan
Legitimizing harassment

I was stunned to read the assertion of Prof. Jaffa Zilbershats, dean of the law faculty at Bar-Ilan University, that women play a part in sexual harassment. Blaming the victim is one of the sick evils of the society in which we live. The man absolves himself of responsibility and uses the woman's "immodest" (in his eyes!) attire to legitimize the act of sexual harassment. Such an attitude has no place in the 21st century. An adult is responsible for his actions, unless proved otherwise by mental health experts.

In the interview, Zilbershats speaks with great pride about another incident of sexual harassment at the university. It's hard not to notice the stark difference between the swift and efficient handling of that incident of sexual harassment on the part of a university employee, "an older maintenance worker," and the long and exhausting progress of the disciplinary committee in the case of sexual harassment on the part of a university employee who also happens to be the university spokesman and the university president's right-hand man.

I congratulate the complainant for her determination and hope that women (and men!) who suffer harassment will draw the strength from her to insist on their rights.

Shira Katz
Tel Aviv

_________________________________________________________________________________


Three months' probation and a fine
By Vered Levy-Barzilai
Haaretz - December 15, 2004

Convicted of sexual harrassment, David Weinberg, the spokesman for Bar-Ilan University and the university president's right-hand man, left his job this week. Remaining on campus are the ostracized complainant and a dean who is not sure that justice has been served.

_________________________________________________________________________________


FAIR USE NOTICE

Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

_________________________________________________________________________________


"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever –– Margaret Mead
_________________________________________________________________________________



Wednesday, February 04, 2004

Case of Uri Suissa

Case of Uri Suissa

Internal Comptroller - Justice Ministry, Jerusalem, Israel


The Civil Service Commission is looking into an allegation that a senior official in the Justice Ministry sexually harassed a female worker and that pressure was put on her to deny the charge.

If you have any more information about this case, please forward it to The Awareness Center.

___________________________________________________________________________________

Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet their own personal needs.

Table of Contents:  

2004
  1. Senior Justice Ministry official accused of sexual harassment (02/04/2004)
___________________________________________________________________________________

Senior Justice Ministry official accused of sexual harassment
By Ruth Sinai
Haaretz - Feburary 4, 2004


The Civil Service Commission is looking into an allegation that a senior official in the Justice Ministry sexually harassed a female worker and that pressure was put on her to deny the charge.

Uri Suissa, the internal comptroller of the ministry, allegedly sexually harassed a secretary in the state prosecution. Three weeks ago, as the investigation against him was underway, Suissa won the tender for supervisor of advanced training courses for lawyers and interns in the civil service. All four members of the committee that chose him were aware of the disciplinary investigation being carried out against him.

Suissa's appointment led to a storm among ministry officials, who said the tender should have been postponed until the investigation was completed, or the appointment should have been delayed. Ministry sources, however, said the investigation had been going on for months and it was not clear when it would conclude. So far, despite the fact that most of the investigation is over, no decision has been made by the commission on whether to charge Suissa with a disciplinary infringement.

The story broke about half a year ago, when an anonymous letter was received by advocate Rivka Shaked, who is in charge of women's advancement in the civil service. The letter alleged that Suissa had abused the secretary. Even though the secretary denied this, the commission decided an investigation should be carried out. The woman subsequently gave evidence several times and reportedly described the alleged attacks by Suissa.

Sources close to Suissa said the woman had written a letter recanting her testimony but investigators believe she may have done this under duress, including pressure from a senior official. It is not clear whether such a letter actually reached the commission.

The lawyers representing Suissa, Ro'i and David Politi, denied all the allegations against their client and said he had been suffering for half a year. "His personal, family and professional life has come to a standstill. We have evidence acquitting [Suissa] and pointing to an attempt to incriminate him," the lawyers said, adding the evidence was being turned over to the police. They said they believed the affair would end with someone else facing charges.

Suissa is the second senior Justice Ministry official to be investigated on charges of harassment over the past year. Three months ago, Amnon Aviad, director of the property register in Jerusalem (Tabu), was charged with harassing 12 female workers. According to the charge sheet presented to the civil service disciplinary tribunal, Aviad said to workers in his office, in previous sexual harassment cases: "It is a shame that he merely harassed the plaintiff... If he had raped her, he would at least have enjoyed himself."

___________________________________________________________________________________

FAIR USE NOTICE

Some of the information on The Awareness Center's web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc.

We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
___________________________________________________________________________________

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has." –– Margaret Mead
___________________________________________________________________________________