Case of Rabbi Matis Weinberg
(AKA: Reb Matisse, Rabbi Matisse
Weinberg)
Kerem Yeshiva in Santa Clara, California
(1980's)
Derech Etz Chaim in Har Nof, Jerusalem,
Israel (2003)
_________________________________________________________________________________
Yeshiva University recently terminated Yeshivat Derech
Etz Chaim's affiliation with the S. Daniel Abraham Joint Israel Program after
discovering "compelling evidence" that a rabbi integrally associated with
the yeshiva has a history of allegedly sexually abusing and engaging in cult-like
behavior with his students.
Jewish Week - Rabbi Weinberg noted
that while he was physically demonstrative to his students, often hugging
them, it was never in a sexual way. "I don't get a hard-on" from such
encounters," asserted the rabbi, who is married and has a large family.
If you or anyone you know were sexually victimized by Rabbi Matis Weinberg and are looking for resources, please feel free to contact The Awareness Center and or your local rape crisis center.
If you or anyone you know were sexually victimized by Rabbi Matis Weinberg and are looking for resources, please feel free to contact The Awareness Center and or your local rape crisis center.
Disclaimer: Inclusion in this website does not constitute a recommendation
or endorsement. Individuals must decide for themselves if the resources meet
their own personal needs.
Table of Contents:
2003
-
Derech Etz Chaim Severed
from YU Israel Program - Original Story
(03/06/2003)
-
From the Editor's Desk -
Yehoshua Levine (03/06/2003)
-
YU cuts ties with yeshiva in
Jerusalem over rabbi's conduct (03/10/2003)
-
Y.U. cuts ties with Jerusalem
yeshiva (03/12/2003)
-
Battle for the Truth - Rabbi
Mattis Weinberg fights Yeshiva University over charges of "inappropriate
influence (03/28/2003)
-
The YU Commentator - Letter
from the Editor and Comments from their readers
(04/10/2003)
-
Rabbis Gone Bad - Part
1
-
The YU - DEC Controversy: An Inital
Response - Past, Present and Future
-
Panel scheduled to hear charges
against rabbi (05/02/2003)
-
Condemning Abuse - Weinberg family
takes action to protect victims of abuse
(05/02/2003)
-
Note from: The Executive
Director of The Awareness Center
-
Note from: The Executive
Director of The Awareness Center
-
Affection Or
Abuse? (05/02/2003)
-
Panel To Hear Charges Against Prominent
Rabbi (05/02/2003)
-
Finally, Steps Toward Confronting
Abuse (05/09/2003)
-
Panel Meets In New York
(05/09/2003)
-
Letters to The Editor - The YU
Commentator (05/18/2003)
-
Jewish Community Grapples With Sex
Abuse (05/27/2003)
-
Rumors And The Rabbi - Rabbi Unnerved
Students (05/27/2003)
-
Israeli school slaps Yeshiva U.
with lawsuit over sex
charges (06/04/2003)
-
Israeli Bet Din Takes Up Rabbi Weinberg
Case (07/11/2003)
-
Rabbi AWOL At Court Date On Molest
Rap (08/22/2003)
-
Molestation Case Is Dismissed
By Rabbinical Court (09/19/2003)
-
Yeshiva University Countersues School
In Rabbi Dispute (12/12/2003)
-
Yeshiva Counter-sues Derech Etz
Chaim (12/28/2003)
2004
-
Derech Etz Chaim: A Yeshiva Worth
Saving (02/03/2004)
-
Derech Etz Chaim and Abuse - Letter
to the Editor, YU Commentator
(02/19/2004)
-
Trial Here To Focus On Abuse
Charges (04/30/2004)
-
Protocol Blogs
2005
- Yeshiva`s Case Ends Before It Begins: YU, Derech Etz Chaim near accord on contract dispute; Weinberg questions remain.
-
Daily Learning with Rav
Matisse (04/28/2005)
2007
-
Testimony
Provided at Maryland Senate Hearing on SB575
(03/01/2007)
2012
Cases Connected to the Feinstein - Tendler - Weinberg Families, and or Ner Israel Yeshiva of Baltimore
- Rabbi Matis Weinberg on Facebook
Cases Connected to the Feinstein - Tendler - Weinberg Families, and or Ner Israel Yeshiva of Baltimore
- The Case of the Students of Ner Israel Yeshiva in the 1950's
- The Case of a List of Abuses at Ner Israel (Toronto, Canada)
- Case of Rabbi Ephraim Bryks
- Case of Rabbi Eliezer Eisgrau
- Case of Rabbi Moshe Eisemann
- Case of Rabbi Benyamin Fleischman
- Case of Rabbi Solomon Hafner
- Case of Rabbi Israel Kestenbaum
- Case of Rabbi Aron Boruch Tendler
- Case of Rabbi Mordecai Tendler
- Case of Rabbi Matis Weinberg
__________________________________________________________________________________
Derech Etz Chaim Severed from YU Israel Program
Derech Etz Chaim Severed from YU Israel Program
by Yehoshua Levine
The Commentator (Yeshiva University)
Volume 67, Issue 9
March 6, 2003 - Adar II 5763
http://www.yucommentator.com/v67i9/news/derech.html
Alleged Sex Offender, Rabbi Matis Weinberg - Now and Then |
Yeshivat Derech Etz Chaim is a small yeshiva in the
Har Nof section of Jerusalem that has been a favorite of Yeshiva's Joint
Israel Committee since it opened its doors five years ago. It has been a
favorite of Yeshiva students as well, boasting more and more students in
Yeshiva's Israel Program each year.
Throughout the past four weeks, YU administrators on
the Joint Israel Committee have ascertained that the rabbi, under whose influence
and tutelage DEC operates, has a longtime record of allegedly exhibiting
exceedingly inappropriate behavior with his students. "What he has allegedly
done," one close source said, "is inconceivably shocking."
Those involved in the recent decision to terminate
the affiliation pointed out that striking parallels to the rabbi's alleged
domineering behavior are currently resurfacing in DEC. "We've been finding
cases that sound eerily similar to those which allegedly occurred in the
past with [the rabbi]," the source said. "And given this situation, we can't
wait three months for something to happen."
The Clues
The charges extend back to 1983, when Yeshivat Kerem,
a yeshiva in Santa Clara, California, mysteriously shut down. The yeshiva
had been thriving until the fall of 1983 when students began to come out
with allegations that they had been sexually abused by the said rabbi during
their years in the yeshiva. Within a few months – after the rabbi, shunned
by the student populace and confirmed as a sexual deviant, left the yeshiva
amidst controversy – Yeshivat Kerem shut down. Because many of the
allegations had been kept quiet, the yeshiva's closing was perceived as the
result of financial difficulty.
The Yeshiva administrators who made the decision to
terminate DEC's affiliation with YU point out that this rabbi is the driving
force behind everything in DEC – from its teaching approach to its overall
hashkafa. To begin with, one of his closest students is DEC Rosh HaYeshiva
Rabbi Aharon Katz, whom he effectively raised since Katz's teenage years.
Two of his sons are rabbeim in the yeshiva. And with rare exceptions, DEC
students consider him their rebbe. Although they have since been removed
in order to downplay his association with DEC, numerous pictures of DEC students
with the rabbi had been on the DEC website, www.ondec.net.
Even a regular online shiur he gives can be found on a site sponsored by
DEC. In the words of a Yeshiva source, "He is not just involved with the
yeshiva – he is the yeshiva."
Asked why, according to his understanding, Yeshivat
Kerem closed, Katz responded, "I have no idea. I graduated as a student there
some time before it closed. My understanding was that the school had financial
problems, not uncommon at that time."
Katz also denies the extent of the said rabbi's influence
and involvement. "On Thursday evenings we host a public shiur which enjoys
the attendance of over 100 people including community members and most DEC
students," he said, in reference to the rabbi's weekly class. Katz would
not comment further on the rabbi's supposed association with DEC or on any
of the specific cases of close interaction with students.
The Evidence
A few weeks ago, a member of the Judaic Studies
administration received a call from a woman whose shabbos guest, a DEC alum,
had repeated a d'var Torah in the name of the rabbi that had contained what
she considered inappropriate and irrelevant sexual references. The woman,
an expert on child abuse who had been on the Independent NCSY Special Commission
investigating Rabbi Baruch Lanner, was mildly distressed and wished to bring
this to the attention of YU, to which DEC was affiliated.
"Her phone call didn't worry me too much at the time,"
the administrator explained. "But it did prompt me to make a few phone calls,
just to make sure. We spoke with the parents of the guy [who had given the
d'var Torah], alumni, and others familiar with the yeshiva. We spoke with
rabbeim who had heard Derech Etz Chaim alumni claim that they don't go to
shiur because only their derech of learning is [the correct one]. And one
thing led to another."
At that point, a number of other administrators joined
the investigation. They spoke with Rabbi Eliezer Eidlitz, a Los Angeles resident
who is currently the principal of Emek Hebrew Academy, an elementary school
in the San Fernando Valley, and a former Rosh Yeshiva of Yeshivat Kerem,
who offered the names and phone numbers of victims and professionals who
had allegedly been involved at many different levels in Kerem. Also explaining
that many students had gone through significant therapy after coming out
with their allegations, Eidlitz attributed the yeshiva's closure to what
had been going on under the rabbi's leadership.
Before contacting anyone else, the investigation narrowed
in on Eidlitz and the sources he had supplied to insure that they could be
trusted. According to a Yeshiva administrator who had made "a number of calls"
to get a sense of Eidlitz's honesty and reliability, "He [Eidlitz] checks
people unbelievably well." And in reference to the victims and professionals
who later recalled the specifics of what went on in Kerem, the administrator
noted that "they were first ascertained to be well-respected members of their
[respective] communities, and most importantly, impeccably honest
people."
Concurrently, YU confirmed that Rav Elya Svei, Rosh
HaYeshiva of the Philadelphia Yeshiva, had written a letter after the Yeshivat
Kerem fiasco that was signed by the rabbi. In the letter, the rabbi agreed
that he would not become involved with chinuch, Jewish education, neither
in the United States nor in Israel, and that in exchange for this agreement,
no charges against him would be pressed. Rabbi Pinchas Lipschutz, Editor
of Yated Neeman and a close attendant of Rav Svei's, recalled that this letter
had indeed been written and signed. Katz, on the other hand, said that he
is "not aware of any such document."
The Decision
Roughly ten Yeshiva administrators – including
Mashgiach Ruchani Rabbi Yosef Blau, Dean of Admissions Michael Kranzler,
Assistant to the Dean of Undergraduate Jewish Studies Rabbi Danni Rapp, Senior
University Dean of Students Dr. Efrem Nulman, Stern College for Women Dean
Dr. Karen Bacon, Dean of Undergraduate Jewish Studies Rabbi Michael Shmidman,
and Director of Enrollment Management Dr. John Fisher, among others –
held a meeting on February 12 and decided to sever YU's affiliation with
DEC on the grounds that the yeshiva's ideological and spiritual backbone
is someone with a history of alleged sexual and psychological abuse of his
students. Because YU stamps an implicit seal of approval upon the schools
in its Israel Program, it was decided that keeping DEC in the Program would
be betraying the trust between YU and its students and their parents.
On February 14, one day before the Israel Program contract
deadline, the Office of Admissions sent out a letter to the parents of current
DEC students informing them that "[a]fter a review of the educational standards
and the learning environment at Derech Etz Chaim, Yeshiva University has
decided to end the affiliation of Derech Etz Chaim with our S. Daniel Abraham
Program in Israel." While promising to grant academic credit to students
who choose to remain in DEC – or, presumably, to learn there on own
their own in the future – the missive offered to "help [students] relocate
to another school in Israel or to the New York campus" should the student
decide to "leave the school now." It was mainly because of this line that
curious parents and students have been contacting YU for information regarding
the decision.
The Office of Admissions also sent a letter to traditional
constituent high schools with a list of the yeshivos in the Israel Program,
urging them to notice that DEC is no longer on the list.
A YU insider stressed that these letters contained
no legal overtones. "We didn't want to get involved with legal issues," he
explained. "The decision [to dissociate from DEC] was our own response to
what we had been finding out. Did we want to continue having a conversation
with them? No. We don't want to have anything to do with them. When it comes
to the issues involved, there's no rehabilitation. There's enough evidence
that people don't change. And his influence pervades the yeshiva. We've already
found evidence of [that]. Yes, we were willing to dissociate ourselves from
a place that [we had formerly] loved."
Kranzler further emphasized YU's confidence in the
decision. "This was an extremely serious, painful decision," he said. "We
were aware of the fact that from a recruitment perspective, we had everything
to lose and nothing to gain. But we are so comfortable, so secure in [what
we decided], as painful and as sad as it is."
Since the decision was made and the letters were mailed,
Yeshiva sources note that they have found even further evidence bolstering
the allegations against the rabbi. "I started speaking with guys that came
out of the woodwork only later, and they gave me levels of detail that you
wouldn't believe," one source said. An administrator pointed out that just
a few days ago, he received a call from a woman whose son went to Tzefat
with the rabbi for three days, and the DEC office would not tell her where
they went.
DEC itself is attempting to come to terms with what
many have called an effective death penalty for the yeshiva. Referring to
YU's decision to end their affiliation with DEC, Katz remarked, "We were
shocked and saddened. We have a enjoyed a wonderful relationship with Yeshiva
University from the beginnings of our institution. We have viewed them as
a partner and a destination we were proud to recommend to our alumni. We
had been in regular contact with members of the faculty and administration
and were given absolutely no indication that they were unhappy with anything
at Derech Etz Chaim."
Katz also expressed frustration at the way YU dealt
with the investigation and subsequent unilateral decision. "When we were
abruptly informed of the decision, no reasons were given to us, and no avenue
for appeal was offered," he said. "Frankly, we expected more."
Katz has been in contact with the said officials and
hopes to figure out a way of winning back YU's favor. In a DEC yeshiva-wide
shmooze on February 27, in fact, he stressed to his students that the said
rabbi is in no way connected to DEC. YU is still quite hesitant, however.
"There's no way they can look beyond their fundamental connection to [this
rabbi]," an administrator noted. "It'll take [a lot] to get us to reverse
our decision."
__________________________________________________________________________________
Letters
to the Editor
From the Editor's Desk - Yehoshua Levine
From the Editor's Desk - Yehoshua Levine
Yeshiva University Commentator - Volume 67, Issue
9
March 6, 2003 - Adar II 5763
http://www.yucommentator.com/v67i9/oped/arkansas.html
Rav Matis Weinberg - Alleged Sex Offender |
The writer wrote that she has "always been curious"
about Yeshiva University and about other colleges "with outwardly religious
identifications." She wondered if and how the religion directly carries over
to our classes and our student activities. At one point, she went right to
the newspaper. Does our newspaper include "religious sermons or Bible or
other Jewish topics"? she wanted to know. Do our religious beliefs influence
what we write?
Without thinking too much, I answered in the affirmative.
I was more than aware of what she was referring to, I told myself. The notion
that The Commentator must answer to a higher authority than other college
newspapers has been a central part of the discourse that our newspaper propounds.
And I wholeheartedly agree with every defense in the book. Of course we are
bound by halacha, and it goes without saying that what we cover and how we
cover it must adhere to a certain morality dictated by the spirit of the
halachic system. Easy.
The day after I received the last of the e-mails from
the Arkansan journalist, a group of Yeshiva administrators decided to terminate
Derech Etz Chaim's affiliation with the University, and I set out to discover
the reasons behind the decision. As I began to learn more and more about
what was going on and what the allegations were – and as I started to
consider publishing an article that would no doubt publicize what I had learned
– the woman's questions took on a new meaning as I realized that my
easily and automatically articulated response to her was translating into
a practical nightmare. Effortlessly preaching the ideal may be a
universally-accepted custom – as it should be – but everything
gets exponentially harder when a practical case comes up, I began to realize.
In certain instances, finding common ground between journalistic responsibility
and the halachic value system proves extremely difficult, and my first thought
was that the case at hand serves as a perfect example of such an
instance.
For two weeks, I weighed the benefits and drawbacks
of publishing the story. Relevance to YU students, while usually the most
important criteria for inclusion in The Commentator, was put on the back
burner in favor of more pressing concerns. I recognized that the biggest
problem with recounting the allegations against the rabbi and the general
background to YU's decision would be potential lashon hara about Derech Etz
Chaim and, most directly, about the rabbi himself. Furthermore, a number
of students (not only alumni) had suggested that the case is already closed,
that the rabbi has been embarrassed enough. Why should I rub salt in the
wound and spread undue lashon hara, they pointed out to me, if there's no
to'eles, productive purpose, that will come out of it?
Ironically, it was precisely the way this argument
was formulated that convinced me that I have every right – and possibly
even an obligation – to indeed publish it. The argument is fundamentally
flawed. The case is not closed. The rabbi may be publicly shamed, but that
was the case twenty years ago as well. Just like then, he may be down, but
he's certainly not out. Notifying the public as to what he has allegedly
done may very well prevent him from abuse not only in Derech Etz Chaim, but
in other yeshivos as well. Since 1983, he has managed to rise up once again
and exert his charisma over an entirely new crop of students. If we let the
issue slide and refuse to publicize what we have discovered about him (which
is what occurred in 1983), what's to stop him from abusing yet another group
of students in ten years from now, somewhere else? Of course there's a to'eles
here.
And the to'eles extends beyond the specific rabbi as
well. This case should serve as a reality check to the potentials of dangerous
rebbe-talmid relationships, especially those that may develop in Israel –
or anywhere else where the student is far from home or otherwise vulnerable.
And indeed, it often takes specific examples to get a point across. To study
Locke's assessment of scientific knowledge from a purely theoretical standpoint,
for example – without understanding how Locke treats Newtonian mechanics
– is useless. Similarly, paying lip service to the risks of abuse or
cult-like conduct in religious role models does not come close to providing
specific examples in which such behavior has allegedly occurred. People remember
information, not abstractions.
I'm not trying to play hero. Far from it. I'm merely
relaying the objective facts of the decision-making and investigatory processes
to the YU community and hoping that doing this will, in some even remotely
indirect way, publicly label the said rabbi as someone who cannot be involved
in any form of chinuch and also alert the public as to the potentialities
of overly domineering and controlling rabbeim, especially for open-minded,
often naïve students away from home for the first time in their lives.
Of course, we cannot take advantage of the situation by embarking on a highly
detailed and opinionated diatribe against the rabbi based on the results
of the investigation. But to assume that there's no purpose in letting people
know what's going on with this allegedly pedophilic rabbi and the yeshiva
that he has molded is, in my opinion, inane and untenable.
It must be noted that the allegations fueling YU's
decision tell us nothing about the Derech Etz Chaim students or alumni, who
have been shoved into this whole mess by virtue of the mere fact that they
are learning or have learned in the yeshiva. These students are sincere guys
who did nothing wrong, and they should not be viewed as members of a cult.
To accuse them of such things – and even to think of them in this manner
– is groundless stupidity and serves as a perfect example of impetuous,
irrational behavior.
To satisfy another of the Chafetz Chaim's conditions
for what allows potentially harmful information to be publicly offered even
in a case of definite to'eles, I made two modifications to earlier drafts
of the article that now appear in the final draft. First, as is clearly evident,
I removed the name of the rabbi. Although at least two respected rabbeim
advised me that there is just as much of a chiyuv to publicize the rabbi's
name as there is a chiyuv to divulge what happened, I felt more comfortable
leaving it out. Anyone wishing to find out his name can easily do so. Second,
I removed a portion of the article that thoroughly described the allegations
themselves, both back then and now in Derech Etz Chaim. I again assumed that
this additional information would be superfluous to the point at hand.
__________________________________________________________________________________ YU cuts ties with yeshiva in Jerusalem over rabbi's conduct
Elli Wohlgelernter
The Jerusalem Post Internet Edition - Mar. 10,
2003
A prominent rabbi loosely affiliated with a Jerusalem
yeshiva was investigated by Yeshiva University and found to have allegedly
sexually abused and engaged in cult-like behavior with his students, leading
YU to sever ties with the Jerusalem school.
The school, Yeshivat Derech Etz Chaim (DEC) located
in Har Nof, is "perplexed at the allegations, and angry at the process and
the lack of menshlechkeit" on the part of YU.
DEC, one of some 15 yeshivot that are part of YU's
Israel Program, was founded five years ago. It is home to some 35 male students
all from the US who study in Israel in their post-high school year, and sometimes
for a second year.
According to YU's newspaper, The Commentator, which
first disclosed the news last week, the school's office of admissions sent
a letter on February 14 to parents of current DEC students, informing them:
"After a review of the educational standards and the learning environment
at Derech Etz Chaim," maintaining its association with DEC would be "betraying
the trust between Yeshiva University and its students."
A source within YU said the investigation had more
to do with the rabbi's domineering influence on the students which was apparent
when the students enrolled at the university upon their return from Israel
than the alleged charge of sexual abuse.
The letter of termination was sent two days before
YU officials met with the head of DEC, Rabbi Aharon Katz, to inform him of
the investigation and the school's decision.
"The YU investigation did not include us," a spokesman
for DEC told The Jerusalem Post. "What kind of investigation does not approach,
address, or notify the party being investigated? Let them send us a letter
telling us about the allegations, and we'll deny it."
The spokesman said the rabbi in question who comes
from a prominent rabbinic family in America has no official capacity with
the school; has never received any money from it; and has stopped the weekly
Torah portion lecture that he used to give on Thursday nights.
Rabbi Yosef Blau, spiritual adviser to YU students
who is presently in Israel, said, "The description of the role that the rabbi
in question played in the school, in terms of the number of classes he gives,
is accurate; but the role he actually plays in terms of the school being
run by his pupils, and many students going to him for Friday and Shabbat,
is far greater than that which is reflected in the number of classes he gives
in the school."
Sexual charges first surfaced over 20 years ago at
a yeshiva the rabbi headed in Santa Clara, California, called Yeshivat Kerem.
The Commentator writes:
"The yeshiva had been thriving until the fall of 1983, when students began to come out with allegations that they had been sexually abused by the said rabbi during their years in the yeshiva. Within a few months after the rabbi, shunned by the student populace and confirmed as a sexual deviant, left the yeshiva amidst controversy Yeshivat Kerem shut down. Because many of the allegations had been kept quiet, the yeshiva's closing was perceived as the result of financial difficulty."
The spokesman for DEC said, "We had heard rumors of
allegations from 20 years ago, but they were vague, they were never proven,
and we treated them as such."
Blau, who met with DEC representatives last week, said
YU has "an obligation to be 100 percent sure that there is no risk to our
students. We are not asserting clear knowledge of anything inappropriate
now. Because of the history, and the levels of closeness and involvement
that a number of students have with him that seems to be encouraged by the
school itself, we felt that we cannot take the responsibility of affiliating
our name, which parents take as an indication that we endorse the
school."
An Orthodox rabbi in the United States said he had
heard about the rumors back then, and that "everyone in the yeshiva world
had a suspicion about this. People saw him as a strange character. He was
different."
Nevertheless, the rabbi said the alleged offender was
a "talmid hacham" (scholar), and a "brilliant thinker, whose sefarim [religious
texts] were well received."
The DEC spokesman said YU is being vague in its questioning
of the yeshiva's "educational standards and the learning environment," and
that by "writing this, they can bring into question almost anything about
anything involved in the yeshiva. What specifically are they claiming?"
The spokesman said that next year, "We may not be able
to open. It's unfortunate that young rebei'im [teachers] will be out of a
job, a fine institution will be shut down, and students who want to come
back for a second year will have to find someplace else to go. We have no
intention of shutting down, but we'll have to see."
__________________________________________________________________________________
Battle for the Truth - Rabbi Mattis Weinberg
fights Yeshiva University over charges of "inappropriate
influence."
by Julie Gruenbaum Fax, Religion Editor
The Jewish Journal of Orange County - March 28,
2003
A prominent rabbi in Jerusalem's Old City, who was rumored to have sexually abused students at a California yeshiva 20 years ago, is fighting new innuendoes that he wields inappropriate influence over students at a Jerusalem yeshiva with which he is loosely affiliated.
Rabbi Mattis Weinberg, who founded Yeshivat Kerem in
Santa Clara in the mid-1970s, counts as some of his strongest supporters
— and detractors — former Kerem students and faculty members who
now live in Los Angeles.
The Kerem scandal reemerged from a two-decade dormancy
last month when Yeshiva University (YU) in New York severed ties with Yeshiva
Derech Etz Chaim (DEC) in Jerusalem, a post-high school yeshiva for about
35 American boys founded five years ago by Weinberg's students and where
Weinberg taught a class once a week. YU alleged that Weinberg has significant
influence among faculty and students and that both past and present inappropriate
behavior warrant caution.
Rabbi Yosef Blau, spiritual adviser to students at
YU, said that one current DEC student has come forward with allegations of
sexual abuse.
He said another five victims from Kerem are willing
to go on record. Weinberg and his supporters have embarked on an aggressive
campaign to clear his name, calling all the allegations — past and present
— ludicrous.
The decades-old scandal has resurfaced in a climate
of hypersensitivity to sexual misconduct in an Orthodox community where incidents
of abuse and cover-up have been exposed in the last few years. Some question
whether Weinberg's case indicates that institutions wary of being accused
of complacency have confused caution with over zealousness, while others laud
the newfound imperative to clear up past wrongs and prevent future ones.
Weinberg is incensed by the accusations.
"Because of their desire to appear holier-than-thou,
they decided to embark on some type of witch hunt or McCarthyism," Weinberg
said in a phone interview from Jerusalem.
Weinberg and his supporters believe YU's reaction can be traced to the fallout from the scandal involving Rabbi Baruch Lanner, who is free pending an appeal after being sentenced last June to seven years in prison for sexually abusing two girls when he was principal of a New Jersey yeshiva in the 1990s. The Orthodox Union, which employed Lanner as a regional director of the National Council for Synagogue Youth, admitted in an internal report to playing a part in covering up Lanner's offenses in the youth group for 20 years — a notion that Weinberg's supporters say has sent the Modern Orthodox Yeshiva University over the edge in caution.
Weinberg and his supporters believe YU's reaction can be traced to the fallout from the scandal involving Rabbi Baruch Lanner, who is free pending an appeal after being sentenced last June to seven years in prison for sexually abusing two girls when he was principal of a New Jersey yeshiva in the 1990s. The Orthodox Union, which employed Lanner as a regional director of the National Council for Synagogue Youth, admitted in an internal report to playing a part in covering up Lanner's offenses in the youth group for 20 years — a notion that Weinberg's supporters say has sent the Modern Orthodox Yeshiva University over the edge in caution.
"We checked the history to our satisfaction and we
were concerned that there might be a problem and we are not ready to have
a relationship with a school and put our name on an institution where there
might be something not healthy for student," Blau said.
Blau said that reports from current students raised
some flags of concern, especially when taken in context of the Kerem scandal
of 20 years ago.
He is confident that more victims — those who
have already spoken with professionals and those who have yet to do so —
will come forward soon. But so far, specifics are lacking.
The Commentator, YU's student paper, reported on one
case where Weinberg took a student (not from DEC) to Safed for a weekend,
and other cases of Weinberg using inappropriate sexual references in Torah
lectures.
Weinberg called the accusations ludicrous. He says
the student who went to Safed was a 20-year-old man who joined Weinberg —
who has 10 children and many grandchildren — on a family trip, splitting
the cost of the rental car. As to sexual content in his lectures, Weinberg
said that both Bible and Talmud are full of such references, and he includes
them where appropriate and necessary when he delivers his many lectures at
yeshivot throughout Israel.
The vagueness of the accusations have angered and
frustrated the administration at DEC, especially since they say DEC's ties
to Weinberg are tenuous, and he holds no special influence over
students.
"There is outrage amongst the present student population
as well as their parents, alumni and alumni parents about the way YU has
conducted itself toward DEC," said Rabbi Aharon Katz, dean of DEC. "YU has
stated to us in conversations [as well as to others] that they have no
allegations from students who have attended DEC."
DEC learned of the allegations only after the letter
went out to parents. As soon as the yeshiva heard the accusations it suspended
the weekly lecture Weinberg was delivering, pending an investigation, said
Rabbi Sholom Strajcher, Katz's father-in-law and DEC president.
"What we want is to put it out on the table," said
Strajcher, educational director of Yeshiva University of Los Angeles Boys
High School (YULA). "Let's create a mechanism of impartial professionals
to look at it so that we can feel that there has been a fair process," he
said.
YU has alleged that Weinberg holds cult-like sway over
his students.
Weinberg's supporters, several of whom contacted The
Journal, say that kind of accusation stems from jealousy.
"What bothers people most about Rabbi Weinberg is that
their Torah is garden variety as compared to his.... He is a brilliant thinker.
He will not accept the usual approaches to Torah," said Rabbi Ari Hier, director
of the Jewish Studies Institute at the Simon Wiesenthal Center, who attended
Kerem for seven years.
"As soon as you are outside of the box, immediately
the Orthodox mediocrity has a problem with you," said Hier, son of Wiesenthal
dean Rabbi Marvin Hier.
Kerem, which existed for seven years, employed some
well-known rabbis in Los Angeles, including Rabbi Shalom Tendler, now rosh
yeshiva at YULA; Rabbi Aron Tendler of Shaarei Tzedek Congregation; Rabbi
Daniel Lapin, formerly of the Pacific Jewish Center in Venice; and Rabbi
Eliezer Eidlitz, now director of development at Emek Hebrew Academy.
It is Eidlitz whom the Commentator quoted as supplying
YU with the ammunition to attack Weinberg and DEC. Eidlitz refused to comment
for The Jewish Journal.
In 1983, a year after Weinberg moved to Israel and
soon before the school closed its doors, major backers of Kerem and faculty
were vying for control of the institution, Weinberg said. Amid that atmosphere,
rumors emerged that Weinberg had sexually abused some of the students. No
charges were ever brought.
Rabbi Ari Guidry, a student at Kerem for seven years,
who has taught at several day schools in Los Angeles and now produces Torah
CDs, said he was the source of some of those rumors. But he says now he
misrepresented appropriate hugs from Weinberg to impress wealthy and powerful
backers who did not like Weinberg.
"There was never anything remotely sexually suggestive,"
Guidry said of his relationship with Weinberg.
But Blau of YU said there are more witnesses who are
not speaking publicly about what happened at Kerem.
Also in question is how the original allegations were
handled. Blau said that there is a letter signed by Weinberg and Rabbi Elya
Svei, a leading rabbinic figure from Philadelphia, stating that Weinberg
would not be involved in education.
"That is absolutely categorically insane," Weinberg
said. "I would love for somebody to produce this document."
One local rabbi familiar with the situation said that
the matter at Kerem was dealt with at a rabbinic assembly involving some
of the most elite rabbis in the United States at the time, including the
late Rabbi Yaakov Weinberg, Weinberg's father and rosh yeshiva of Ner Israel
in Baltimore. Because of Weinberg's lineage — he is the grandson of
the highly respected late Rabbi Yaakov Ruderman — Weinberg was quietly
confined to a life without direct influence over students so that scandal
would not touch this respected Torah family, this rabbi alleged.
"That never happened. It is absolutely, categorically,
simply totally untrue," Weinberg said of such an assembly.
Weinberg said that all he is guilty of is possessing
the overconfidence of a 29-year-old in charge of a school and loving his
students. Kerem took in many students from broken homes, he said.
"I believe that when kids are shown, for the first
time in their lives, support and concern and actual love, it makes all the
difference to them," he said. "When subsequently these accusations were made
and the kids were told that nobody loved you and cared about you and any
sign of comfort was because it was giving somebody a sexual charge —
that such a devastating thing to them," Weinberg said.
Weinberg said his supporters are in negotiations with
YU, but if the situation is not resolved he will take legal action.
"If I had spent the years I spent being productive
getting involved in such nonsense, I would not have given thousands of classes
or published books. I would have become a bitter, small-minded person who
worries about what other people think and about their lashon hara [gossip],"
Weinberg said. "But I have been put into a position that if they continue
this, it has to be stopped."
Blau said that YU stands by its actions, and that more
information will soon emerge. Meanwhile, Blau said, the students must be
protected.
"There is some level of suspicion and some level of
risk, and that is enough to react," he said.
__________________________________________________________________________________ The Commentator
April 10, 2003 - Nissan 5763
Volume 67, Issue 11
http://www.yucommentator.com/v67i11/oped/DEC%20letters.html
Editors' Note:
The "Derech Etz Chaim" story published in the Commentator's
last issue has generated worldwide attention. Immediately after our publication,
The Jerusalem Post picked up the story and published a front-page synopsis.
The Awareness Center, an organization dedicated to protecting the Jewish
Community from sex offenders in leadership positions, has opened a dossier
on the accused rabbi. Yeshivat Derech Etz Chaim has published a lengthy response
to our article at their website (www.ondec.net), and has launched a public
relations campaign aiming to convince Yeshiva to reverse its decision.
As a news source, the Commentator is neutral towards
both the rabbi in question and towards Derech Etz Chaim. The original article
reported the information that was most relevant to the Yeshiva University
community. Precisely because we did not wish to sensationalize the story,
we omitted the rabbi's name and the most egregious allegations. Ironically,
this circumspection has led to the accusation that our reporting was groundless
and irresponsible.
Many of the letters below question Yeshiva's judgment
in revoking its accreditation and the particular process employed. We respect
the sensitive nature of the decision and the time pressure under which it
was made. Ultimately, it is not our place in our news reporting to decide
whether it was correct.
We invite the reader to read these responses, consider
the issues carefully, and contribute to the discussion.
------------------------------------
Note from The Awareness Center
The Awareness Center Strongly supports The YU Commentator for breaking the story regarding Rabbi Matis Weinberg. It took a lot of courage to let this story (that was 20 years in the making) come out of the closet. But there was a mistake in the letter writen by the YU Commentator's editor. The Awareness Center is an international organization dedicated to addressing SEXUAL ABUSE in Jewish Communities around the world. We offer resources and information on all sorts of topics that relate to educating the Jewish community on the ramifications sexual abuse can have on individuals, families, friends, and our society. This includes information on and about sex offenders.
Sincerely,Vicki Polin, MA, ATR, LCPC
Executive Director - The Awareness Center
-------------------------------------------
Disappointed by Vendetta
To the Editors:
Having grown up in post-war Holland, I often envied
the opportunities provided by YU and its affiliated schools. To me, as to
so many Jewish European youth, YU symbolized "Tora Im Derech Eretz" - a high
academic level combined with sheer unlimited access to a solid Jewish
Education.
I was dismayed, even shocked to read your article on
Yeshivat Derech Etz Chaim. Shocked because the quality of the article does
not behoove an institution that stands for academic and halachic principles.
Let me start to mention that I am not a "chassid" of the Rov in question,
neither an alumnus of his Yeshiva. I am actually in his age group. I happen
to be somewhat familiar with his writings and enjoy listening to his Daf
Yomi- and other shiurim on the web. Across the wide range of Jewish society,
from left to right, so to say, he is acknowledged as a great Talmid Chochom
and, more, an innovative and creative mind. There are, regrettably, very
few of his caliber around and we should support those who enrich us.
The article by Mr. Levine (I assume for legal reasons)
carefully avoids mentioning the Rov's name but he injects ample ramozim to
easily find out who he is writing about. Artful tricks that belong in the
sewer press, not in a YU publication. Worse than that, the article is based
upon ......"a rabbi associated with the yeshiva".....; ....."a history of
alleged sexually abusing"......, and to top it of "a woman" who was not told
that her son joined the Rov for 3 days in Tzefat,is presented as a witness
a charge. (Was her son the only one that went to Tzefat, were there 100 hundred
others joining??) I happen to know that this Rov regularly retires to Tzefat
to write. At no time, the article discusses the level of learning in the
Yeshiva. The academic level, apparently, does not interest the writer, nor
YU. Someone at YU decided to start, what well could be, a vendetta on basis
of nothing more than hearsay, "alleged misdoings" and more of this kind of
biased attitudes. Whether it is Loshon Hora or Rechilus does not interest
me. It's either and equally wrong.
The article admits that YU has taken the decision
unilaterally, without discussing it with the Yeshiva's mentors. YU knew very
well that its decision equals the kiss of death, not only for the yeshiva,
but for all the people that work there and have put their hearts and souls
into creating a yeshiva "with a healthy difference".
The interesting fact is that the article actually,
indirectly proves that the 'allegations" must have been unfounded. We are
talking California in the eighties!! Is there anyone who seriously believes
that parents and authorities would just disregard allegations of sexual abuse,
only because the Rov promised that he would no longer "become involved in
chinuch, neither in the US nor in Israel". (apparently French and Dutch Jewish
kids are ok to be tought by him). Does Mr. Levine seriously believes that
parents of young men who went "through significant therapy after coming out
with their allegations", would just sit back and be satisfied with the Rov's
self imposed removal from the Chinuch scene? In the world's most litigious
country? Could it be that they went into therapy to get over their lying
and thus harming a man and his family?
In our democratic (and halachic) society we look at
facts. We listen to both parties in a dispute. We don't base ourselves upon
hollow allegations, motes shem ra, rechilus or loshon hora. Not so YU, whose
actions on basis of something that may- or most likely has not- happened
20 years (!!) ago. In the process, a valuable thinker and his family become
tainted and many families are on the street. YU does not like the Rosh Yeshiva
(for those who did not read the article: the Rov in question has no official
affiliation with the DEC Yeshiva - he gives a weekly shi'ur attended by some
100 listeners), since they consider him a talmid of the Rov. So, the issue
is a toldo detoldo. Frankly, if the rule has become that we start looking
at the source of education of teachers in YU affiliated Yeshivot, I can list
some more learning institutions that should be taken off the list. I cannot
suppress the strong feeling that we have to do with a pure personal issue,
blown out of proportions with complete disregard for all those individuals
who suffer from it.
M. Wikler
Amsterdam
NA 1970
-------------------------------------------
An Insider's Appraisal: Pure Motzi Shem Ra
As a woman married to an alumnus of Kerem Yeshiva who
has remained a talmid of the accused rabbi, and as a Shabbat host to the
Derech Etz Chayim student body I vehemently decry the slander of the
aforementioned.
For over 20 years I have been associated with dozens
of former Kerem students who continue to be in touch with their Rav and have
in no way and for no reason cut ties with him. To make the accusations which
you have made based on untrue sources which are politically motivated (yes,
I have done my research before writing this letter) to destroy the name of
a Talmid Chacham and to besmirch the name of an excellent educational institution
is unethical and goes against everything the Torah stands for.
I am shocked that an institution of Yeshiva University's
caliber would stoop to such levels to satisfy an individual of power who
is out to destroy a fellow Jews reputation.
If there were any truth to the allegations, you are
right, it would be a mitzvah to publicize it . But you are well aware that
the article to which I am referring is nothing more than "Motzei Shem Rah"
of the worst degree.
It is not the Torah approach to skew facts to achieve
a political goal.
Shoshanah Hirsch Selavan (wife of Rabbi Barnea
Selavan)
Michlalah 1987
-------------------------------------------
A Grave Injustice
March 16, 2003
13 Adar Hasheni, 5763
To the editors:
I have been a mechanech for 25 years, most recently
as Rosh Kollel of the Boca Raton Community Kollel, until illness forced me
to retire from active service. I am writing to express my great distress
and deep concern over the grave injustice and injury done to Yeshivat Derech
Etz Chaim (DEC) by Yeshiva University. As a parent of a talmid of DEC for
4 years, as a frequent visitor and observer of the yeshiva - one who observed
the yeshiva not only as a parent but as a professional mechanech - I am outraged
by the report on the yeshiva that appeared in The Commentator on March 6.
The report is filled with spurious claims that paint an utterly false picture
of the yeshiva. DEC is an outstanding institution - fresh, vibrant, open,
intellectually and spiritually challenging. Torah is alive and exciting at
DEC. DEC not only claims to meet the needs of each student individually but
actually does. As a former high school principal, I visited many yeshivot
affiliated with the S. Daniel Abraham Program in Israel and DEC was and is
the equal of any of them. The peremptory and one sided nature of the decision
made by Yeshiva University to terminate DEC's affiliation with the Israel
program was reckless. Yeshiva University has an unquestionable obligation
to right this terrible wrong. Taanit Esther is a most appropriate time for
such action.
Rabbi Moshe Miller
Boca Raton, Florida
-------------------------------------------
A Contemptible Violation of Due Process
I found this article tendentious and irresponsible.
More importantly, YU has set itself up as not just the purveyors of
unsubstantiated lashon hara and lies, but as judge and jury as well. If there
is any serious evidence of abuse, then it is the responsibility of any serious
educator to see that police and social welfare professionals are involved.
YU has not done that, and after having missed the boat for well over a decade
on the Baruch Lanner fiasco, is now pursuing a witch-hunt based on rumor,
innuendo, and lies. It is simply contemptible.
If there is any evidence of impropriety, let them bring
it forward to the responsible authorities. If there is no such evidence,
a public apology is in order, and probably financial compensation due to
Derech Etz Chaim for the malicious gossip YU has been spreading. I have
personally visited Derech Etz Chaim on numerous occasions and found the yeshiva
to be a place where the "kol HaTorah" is pervasive, and the spirit of the
bochrim rich with energy and simcha.
David Willner
MA Ed (Marriage Family and Child Counseling)
Loyola 1985
-------------------------------------------
A Witch Hunt
The article sounds honest enough. But we know better,
don't we? You claim that an intensive international investigation resulted
in the yeshiva deciding to terminate its affiliation/accreditation with Yeshivat
Derech Etz Chaim. If that were so, why wasn't the yeshiva in Israel given
warning/alert that YU was considering drastic action after discovering
"compelling evidence" .....?
Dumping YU's decision on the lap of Rabbi Katz during
his recent visit, with NO prior warning or indication that something was
amiss; not allowing DEC a chance to defend themselves, make amends or conduct
their OWN intensive international investigation reeks of a witch hunt, do
nothing of un-menschlichkite behavior.
The fact that both your lead articles deal with sexual
issues and cult-like behavior make me think that someone at YU has a real
problem! Will these same teachers apologize to the Rabbi integrally associated
for richilus, motzei sham ra, to say nothing of hillul hashem?
Dovid Solomon (a longtime student of the accused
rabbi)
Lanner
Legacy causes damage at DEC
How unfortunate that the collateral damage from the
Lanner affair continues.
Publications such as The Jewish Week, and general pressure
from liberal Orthodox groups, continue to make the Modern Orthodox rabbinate
hyper-defensive. For example, spurred by the outcry that led to his recent
apology, Rabbi Yoseph Blau, in his zeal to exonerate himself has now targeted
legitimate educational institutions in his self-serving quest to improve
his image. To show his credentials as a vigilante in the service of vulnerable
youth, Rabbi Blau has set his sights on destroying institutions of torah
learning based on the most tenuous of claims.
Without question, the events of the Lanner case constitute
a deplorable case of inexcusable behavior and inappropriate response. What
is most unfortunate however is that the irresponsibility of some of the main
actors in the story continues.
Paul Loni
Signed: UCLA 1987
-------------------------------------------
Rabbi Yosef Blau Responds:
The accusations against this Rabbi who clearly is a
dominant force in Derech Etz Chaim, as proven by the angry letters, though
the Roshei Yeshiva denied it, came from victims, psychologists who treated
victims and Rabbis. The investigation of Kerem did not include any person
connected with Y.U. Yeshiva's decision was made by a broad committee. Attacking
me is irrelevant because I did not initiate the investigation and the same
decision would have been reached if I were not involved. Anyone familiar
with my actions in dealing with Baruch Lanner knows that I do not have to
criticize any other rabbi accused of abusive behavior to cover for my earlier
mistakes. What has been learned from the Lanner affair is that no improper
behavior should be ignored because of the good that someone does particularly
abusive behavior which can cause immeasurable damage.
Sincerely,
Yosef
Blau
-------------------------------------------
Satisfied DEC Parents
In response to Yeshiva University's decision to
disaffiliate the Derech Etz Chaim, and to respond to the article in the
Commentator, we felt that YU should hear about our son's experiences at DEC
this year.
Our son has been at Derech Etz Chaim (DEC) since August.
Based on our weekly phone calls and the various emails it is readily apparent
that DEC has had a very positive effect on our son. My nephew is also at
DEC and his father went for a visit in November. The report back to us was
that both boys were involved in extensive learning, that the overall environment
was conducive and encouraging, that the Rebbe's were cognizant of the needs
of each student and that most importantly, both students, our sons, were
very happy.
Every time we speak with our son, we hear about his
learning, about the involvement of the various Rebbe's in his development,
how excited he is about learning for 10-12 hours a day, and sometimes longer.
He tells us about his involvement in his school and the various activities
at DEC. You can hear the intensity about his learning and the maturity in
his voice.
During the times of crisis in Israel, DEC has contacted
us with emails to tell us that they have contacted all the students and that
they are safe. This communication, especially during a bombing or other tragedy
in Israel, has saved us countless hours of worry and shown us how deeply
concerned Rabbi Katz and DEC is for all of the students and their families.
Other families with sons at other yeshivas have not received this instant
communication about the safety of their children.
The charge of a "cult like mentality" at DEC is baseless
and not true. From the first day our son was there, he told us of the diversity
in students and about the diversity of the Rebbes as well. Recently, we attended
an alumni shabbaton here in Pittsburgh for DEC. There were approximately
40 young men that had traveled from all over the country; California, Texas,
Boston, New York and Baltimore, just to be together and to see their Rosh
Yeshiva. At their introduction for the shabbaton, each student informed the
group of the number of years that they had attended DEC and their current
college and course of study.
Each was mature, articulate and nicer than the next,
in their demeanor and in their respect for each other, the parents in attendance
and for their Rosh Yeshiva. This is not characteristics of a cult mentality.
In addition, we have constant contact with our son.
Daily e-mails and phone calls twice a week. Usually you don't hear of cults
with that consistent contact with the outside world. The DEC website is in
the public domain with pictures of the students, activities, and Divrei Torah,
certainly not evidence of cult like behavior. Other friends of ours whose
sons went to DEC and are now in college are very pleased with their son's
development, maturity and they are all Ben Torahs. What parent doesn't want
that for their son? Our son is having an amazing year of learning and study
at a fine institution that is staffed byqualified teachers and
administration.
Based on what we have heard and read, YU has done a
hatchet job on this institution and done it with third hand knowledge, without
actual charges in any legal venue, Jewish or civil. In addition, upon reading
the article in the Commentator, one would think that incidents have happened
recently. Again, no events have happened since the beginning of DEC, these
charges are not true, and there are no facts, no charges, no specifics. This
is yellow journalism by the Commentator, and typical of "indictment on the
front page with vindication hidden later on the back page." I guess
sensationalism sells even the Commentator on the YU campus. As far as the
administration at YU, again, over reacting based on heresy evidence at best
and not substantiated or supported in any jurisdiction.
Barry Faigen and Debby Eisner
Pittsburgh PA
Signed: Penn State 1976
-----------------------------
Disclose the Name: Protect the Community
To the Editors:
YU, Rabbi Blau, Rabbi Willig, Rabbi Levine, those in
the know in California, etc., must learn a lesson from the Lanner case. The
obligation to protect must not be misdirected to the suspected (in this case,
known), protection must be given to the victims and potential victims. By
allowing the offender to go unnamed, you, the Jerusalem Post, the powers
that be in California etc., are all paving the way for him to strike again.
There are enough victims. There too many scarred young people. You and owe
it to the community, especially our youth, to tell the whole truth and name
the offender. How many less people would have been effected had Boruch Lanner
been exposed at the start? Who will be blamed and who will be forced to publicly
apologize if this despicable individual, this disgrace to the Torah world
(in spite of his supposed Talmud Chacham standing)is allowed to remain anonymous.
We all know, he will certainly strike again.
Just as the YU Rabbis have stated that disclosing those
who cheat (a recent Commentator article) is an obligation, even more so is
disclosing one who harms our young people.
Debra Cohen
Did not attend YU, 1995
-------------------------------------------
Disgraceful Cover-up
To the Editors:
One wonders if Rav Svei's son had been molested whether
he would have agreed to not press charges. Equal to this criminal behaviour
is the cover up, and we talk about the Catholic Church. What a Shanda.
Dr. Warren Gross ( A parent whose son WAS scheduled
to attend DEC in the fall. ) Parent '07
-------------------------------------------
Reasoned and Justified Reporting
To The Editors:
I am writing in response to those who would object
to YU's decision to remove Derech Etz Chaim from the Israel Program and the
decision of The Commentator to write a substantial article on the subject.
Although no one has actually written an article voicing such a protest, seeing
as that the issue was only brought up in this week's Commentator, many of
my friends have strenuously objected to these decisions and I am sure that
several letters have already been submitted on the subject.
Firstly, I would like to point out that I have friends
who have attended DEC in the past and who are there today as well, I do not
intend my comments to be malicious.
Next, I feel the subject must be broken down into two
main issues. First, there is the objection to YU's expulsion of DEC from
the Israel Program. Then, there is the decision of The Commentator to write
a lead article on the subject. This separation might be obvious to some,
but in the arguments I've had, the lines have frequently been blurred.
I completely agree with YU's decision to terminate
its connection with DEC. This does not mean that I assume the accused Rabbi
to be guilty. YU does not have the responsibility to become involved in
litigation, whether secular or Jewish, to determine whether this particular
Rav is innocent or guilty. It is beyond doubt that he has been very closely
connected with allegations of abuse in the past. It seems likely that significant
proof does exist, whether we are privy to its existence or not, based on
the fact that such charges weren't staunchly repudiated years ago. He has
been connected with abuse, nothing has broken that connection and passage
of time can not change that fact. YU can not associate itself with such an
individual. Therefore, YU can not associate with institutions that associate
with such an individual. Once again, this does not necessarily mean that
YU believes that this Rav is guilty, but as a yeshiva and as a university,
YU can not risk being associated with those accused of abuse.
The Commentator commits itself to informing the student
body of issues and events that affect it. Obviously, as it is part of an
institution committed to Orthodox Jewish ideals, it must also factor in laws
such as Lashon Hara and Motzei Shem Ra. It answers to a higher authority
then just "getting a scoop out." That being said, there are certain issues
which must be brought to the attention of the students despite the pain in
might cause an individual. Clearly, certain methods must be used to protect
the individual that a story names, but not to the extent of suppression of
the issue.
With that in mind, I believe The Commentator staff
made the correct decision in publishing the article on DEC. As a student
of Yeshiva University, I believe that I, along with my peers, have a right
to know if our institution is associated with individuals accused of abuse.
No less would be demanded by a student at Boston University or a bachur in
the Mirrer Yeshiva. Who my college chooses to associate with, by definition
plays a part in how my institution is perceived by others and therefore how
I am seen as well. Therefore, I have a right to know if my institution is
associating with those accused of abuse and if such an association has been
terminated. Such things affect me and myfuture.
In terms of Lashon Hara, the article did not mention
the Rav's name, and as the author mentions in his explanation of why he wrote
the article, also leaves out a significant amount of the allegations. We
have a right to know the general issues, the same can not be said for exact
details.
Some have said that, in spite of these methods, the
article essentially made it easy for anyone to discover who the Rav was by
providing the DEC website which has the Rav's name on it. To that I respond
that The Commentator staff can not be held responsible for individuals chasing
after Lashon Hara. If someone, of their own accord, tries to decipher who
the Rav referred to is, that is their problem and not Lashon Hara on the
part of the author of the article.
The issues involved in such a case are complex. With
Rabbanim, we often want to exonerate those accused to the detriment of the
accuser. Even presuming the possibility of innocence of the involved Rav,
I believe YU and The Commentator made the proper decisions.
Aaron Gavant
Signed: YC 2005
-------------------------------------------
A Personal and Professional Evaluation
Dear Mr. Levine:
I wish to discuss this case of Rabbi Matis Weinberg.
By coincidence, my husband, myself and two of my three sons as well as their
wives when possible, have been attending Rabbi Weinberg's Thursday night
Shiur. Before launching into the main topic, some background information
is relevant.
My husband practiced psychiatry in Atlanta, Georgia
as well as holding board certification in psychiatry, and a position of assistant
professor in the Emory University school of medicine department of psychiatry.
I hold an undergraduate degree in pharmacy, graduated with a Ph.D. in medical
physiology from medical school as well as two years of post-doctoral as an
NIH fellow at Emory University school of medicine department of physiology.
I was individually tutored by Dr. Lee Hall,head of the psychoanalytic program,
for two years. We founded and co-directed the marriage and sex counseling
clinic at Emory University school of medicine for 7 years. Our responsibility
was to train psychiatric residents to deal with these problems in couple
therapy.
My oldest son, Danny, age 30, was the first of our
family to begin to attend his shiur on Thursdays. He attended Keren B'Yavne
as well as Nir Israel. Jeremy, age 22, is finishing the Hesder program at
Yeshivat Otniel. My middle son, Micah, is working in New York at KPMG but
graduated YU with honors. He, his wife and baby spend every other Shabbat
at Stern where they are the "resident Rabbi and family" for the girls at
Stern.
Danny has been reading Rabbi Weinberg's books for a
number of years – long before he met him in person. When he learned
about the Thursday night Shiur, he went regularly and was so impressed, that
he invited Jeremy to go with him. This is probably important: Jeremy went
one time and came back so enthusiastic and intellectually stimulated, that
he started driving to Jerusalem every Thursday. If you know the drive from
Otniel to Jerusalem, you know this is a big deal. I don't think it's possible
to be involved in a cult-like experience from one evening.
Because of this enthusiasm, my husband and I decided
we should also see exactly what all the excitement is about. I am writing
to confirm that, yes, it is possible to be totally engaged by this brilliant,
gifted rabbi who is also a charismatic and totally mesmerizing speaker. I
can explain something of why he is so unique: In addition to Rabbinic studies,
he has a significant mastery of literature, history, chemistry, physics,
psychology, poetry, etc. He can weave it all together in such a way as to
leave you stunned with his insights. In other words, he is a genius with
the additional talent of being a marvelous teacher.
Now we come to these terrible charges against him.
My husband and I spent hours observing him with his students. Of course,
that was not our intention, but it happened. Neither of us saw the slightest
sign of "cult-like" behavior. It's very difficult to imagine that we would
not pick up on this immediately. I did not see any difference between their
behavior and Jeremy's or that of my husband. It is so exciting to learn from
someone who is so brilliant and a teacher with such a unique insight that
is probably only possible from someone with such a vast store of information
from so many different fields of learning.
I can give you another example: Micah studied under
Rabbi Rosensweig at YU. He has his rabbi's photograph prominently displayed
in his home, he hangs on his every word and consults him on issues that are
important to him. Is that "cult-like" behavior? No. So I must assume it's
because of the limited amount of time the students actually spent with Rabbi
Matis relative to the tremendous influence that he had on them.
At the moment I simply reject the conclusion of a "cult"
or anything remotely resembling this. I understand completely what an amazing
experience it is to be taught by such a gifted man.
As you can imagine considering my long years in academics,
I am quite at home and comfortable with people who would be classified as
"genius." I don't recall a single one that wasn't "different", even peculiar
by normal standards. They all marched to their own drummers. They definitely
do stand out often as eccentric or odd or on another planet. I personally
find their differences to be fascinating and an enrichment in my life. Some
people are invariably threatened especially if they enter their field of
study. It must feel a bit like being the very best tennis player in your
circle and then having Andre Agassi move into your turf. It doesn't necessarily
feel good. While I consider the charge of "cult like" behavior to be totally
ridiculous, I am shocked at the charges from 20 years ago of sexual
misconduct.
While anything is possible, of course, I want to tell
you why this seems a bit hysterical. First, I think panic set in as a result
of confirmed sexual abuse cases that involved YU staff in the recent past.
I don't know the details and only vaguely remember the stories. Second, sexual
predators usually do not, can not wait 20 years before striking again. Thirdly,
they usually have disturbed relationships in other areas. As best I can
determine, this was an isolated charge 20 years ago and nothing after that.
I had the pleasure of attending the Thursday shiur with his daughters and,
once again, observing them and their interaction with their father. I can
tell you that any father would be so pleased so have such love and respect
from his teenage daughters.
Since what is being implied by the Commentator as well
as splashed on the front page of the JPost can literally ruin this man's
life, not to mention the intense suffering of his family, I am appealing
to you to consider this letter.
I hope I will hear from you. You seem to have information
about whatever happened 20 years ago. Who were the "professionals." Who were
the students? Doesn't anyone
accused of such terrible crimes have the right to confront
his accusers? Obviously all we know is what we read in the newspaper. It
is with relief that the Jewish community is confronting and aggressively
advertising sexual offenders within their boundaries. However, God forbid
that someone innocent be ruined by inclusion.
Sincerely,
Lynn Gimpel, Ph.D.
Signed: emory 1971
__________________________________________________________________________________
Y.U. cuts ties with Jerusalem
yeshiva
JTA Daily Briefing - March 12, 2003 (Original Author)
Chicago Jewish News - Friday, March 14, 2003
Chicago Jewish News - Friday, March 14, 2003
Yeshiva University cut ties with an Israeli yeshiva
amid charges that a rabbi suspected of sexual and psychological abuse is
maintaining improper influence over some students. A Y.U. official confirmed
reports that the university severed ties with Yeshivat Derech Etz Chaim in
Jerusalem after it learned that 10 sophomores who had studied with a certain
rabbi during their Year in Israel program continued to attend Jewish studies
classes with him instead of attending regular classes upon their return.
"The students had a tie to this rabbi, they had a certain allegiance to him
and they felt they wanted to continue their relationship with him —
and this is what raised questions, in light of the fact that there is a history
of allegations," the official said. "The allegations were serious enough
that it would not be appropriate for Yeshiva University to have their students
in that kind of environment." Y.U. will not take disciplinary action against
the students for failing to attend class, and no one charges that they have
been abused, the official said. An official at Derech Etz Chaim blasted Y.U.,
telling the Jerusalem Post that the university probe into the matter "did
not include us." Sexual abuse allegations against the rabbi first surfaced
20 years ago at a California yeshiva, the Post reported, though they were
never proven. Y.U. is making alternate plans for 11 freshman and four sophomores
still at the yeshiva in Jerusalem's Har Nof neighborhood, the official
said.
__________________________________________________________________________________ Rabbis gone bad - Part 1
In this first in a series of articles dealing with
clergy abuse, Jewsweek's Steven I. Weiss explores the many faceted issue
of rabbis in trouble.
by Steven I. Weiss
Jewsweek.com - April 7, 2003
Richard Marcovitz, Matis Weinberg, Baruch Lanner. The
names of those rabbis recently accused or convicted of sexually abusing their
students are, for some, an obsession, for others, barely worth noting. What
rabbinic abuse means for the Jewish community is, at present, largely an
open question. In recent years, the explosion of the Catholic clergy scandal
alongside a number of well-reported instances of criminally abusive behavior
by rabbis has focused a new attention on how the Jewish community should
deal with its problem.
Exactly what is driving this period of discovery is
hard to say. Whether abuse has actually increased in recent years, whether
victims have become less wary of reporting violations, or whether a more
concerted investigative effort is responsible, what is very clear is that
the issue has become more prominent than at perhaps any other point in history.
In a series of articles, this space will discuss all of these and many other
possibilities and their consequences. It will introduce some specific cases,
the major responses to abuse, a breakdown of how the various movements deal
with abuse, and analysis of how the community -- and media in specific --
interact with the problem.
Cases of rabbinic abuse that have surfaced fall into
three primary categories: those that have been dealt with exclusively by
the community, those that have involved law enforcement in the matter, and
those that have involved both. Each case is, in many ways, a test for each
method of dealing with the problem, and each offers an understanding of how
these situations may pan out in the future.
Jewsweek readers will be familiar with the case of
Rabbi Baruch Lanner. Nearly three years ago, a local New York Jewish newspaper
detailed accusations made against Baruch Lanner, declaring that he had abused
teens throughout his three-decade involvement in the Orthodox youth group,
NCSY. What followed was an intense investigation of the cover-ups and failures
on the part of the Orthodox Union, NCSY's parent organization, as well as
criminal charges that resulted in a seven-year sentence. The failure of the
Orthodox Union, as well as the Jewish community generally, to respond to
repeated allegations, was a primary focus of those involved with the
case.
This summer, following Lanner's conviction, Jewsweek
detailed several aspects of the case, including conflicts over how Lanner
should be treated, as well as a revealing look at those who have continued
to support Lanner even after his conviction. Lanner's case is unique because
it involved efforts at enforcement both from the communal side and from law
enforcement -- begging the question "Is the Lanner situation over?" This
series of articles will find answers to that question.
Another recent case is that of Richard Marcovitz, who
pleaded guilty last week to charges that he "groped two female employees
of a religious school and two girls who attended classes," according to news
reports. Marcovitz, 66, will be serving a twenty-year sentence. Marcovitz
is one of a number of rabbis whose abusive behavior was dealt with directly
and exclusively by law enforcement. What members of the community think of
this approach and its effectiveness will be a part of upcoming articles.
Then there is Matis Weinberg, who is the most prominent
case of communal self-enforcement. According to news reports, Weinberg was
at Yeshivat Kerem in Santa Clara, California in the early 1980s when he was
run out of town by Jewish authority Rabbi Elya Svei, following allegations
of abuse. Also according to news reports, Svei ordered Weinberg to sign a
letter guaranteeing that he would never again teach children.
Then this winter, a group of rabbis withdrew certification
for an Israeli yeshiva where Weinberg had taught, following an investigation
into his behavior. But the credibility of that investigation is already being
challenged. Some stories about the case have served as little more than rebuttals
from leaders at the yeshiva, or those representing Weinberg. Jewsweek has
spoken with sources who have challenged outright the veracity of the
investigation's findings, as well as some individuals involved with the actual
investigation. The next article in this series will reveal the arguments
and allegations on both sides, and examine how Weinberg's case affects the
communal enforcement option.
At some level, of course, communal enforcement is the
only option. Even when Megan's Law is applicable, the community is still
responsible for deciding whether and how to let a convicted pedophile rejoin
the community and possibly retain a clergy position. And what of rabbinic
misconduct generally? Can a convicted embezzler return to a position of
authority? What about someone convicted of possessing child pornography,
as Rabbi Juda Mintz was last week in New Jersey? Or someone who contracts
a murder, like Rabbi Fred Neulander, who was convicted this summer? What
about someone against whom there have been serious allegations, but no
conviction? All of these choices have to be made by the community, as American
law is neutral on the matter.
Moving forward, the possibility that communal
self-enforcement can go too far, excluding people for conduct that is not
objectively criminal or harmful, but is judged to be so by those empowered
to make the decision. This, allege Weinberg's defenders, is what happened
to their friend and teacher when he utilized unorthodox methods of teaching.
Can a policy of communal enforcement allow, rather ironically, those with
the power to make such decision capable of abusing it? What kind of checks
can be made to ensure that individuals are not blacklisted for the wrong
reasons?
Beyond the questions of who, how, and why in dealing
with abusive rabbis, is the question of how the laity can involve itself.
Lanner's case, for example, would not even have seen daylight had it not
been for the reporting of Gary Rosenblatt in New York's Jewish Week, and
it is an absolute fact that almost all of the names of rabbis already mentioned,
as well as those names to come, would simply not be part of this article
if they hadn't been reported. Media ethics questions necessarily follow if
media is going to serve not just to ring the alarm bells, but as enforcers
as well. Just as important, though, is for the media to pursue stories
aggressively. Later on in this series will come a presentation on how long
it usually takes for allegations to surface in the media or elsewhere, and
a discussion of whether the media can be more pro-active in these
matters.
Just as this series is only in its beginning stages,
answers to the questions posed above are still in development. We will visit
the Awareness Center, a fledgling organization founded to help answer these
problems. As well, some schools, organizations, and movements have their
own policies on the books. Over the course of this series, you will be introduced
to many of them and, to some degree, by your participation, they will be
introduced to you.
__________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________
The YU - DEC Controversy: An Initial Response - Past,
Present and Future
Submitted by Rabbi Sholom Strajcher - President, Derech
Etz Chaim Institutions, Inc.
http://www.ondec.net/statement.htm
Any article about, or response to, the topics raised
in The Commentator piece on the YU-DEC controversy requires a great deal
of sensitivity; not only in light of the topics presented, but because of
the need for deep concern and compassion for all those who may have been
hurt, harmed, or pained by the process of openly discussing such serious,
unsubstantiated allegations. As Torah Jews we share an obligation to be guided
by the highest values of Bain Adom Lachavayro and Kavod Habriyot even when
in the pursuit of truth. We are most worried about the harm to the DEC family
of alumni, current Talmidim, rebbeyim and supporters who have been put through
an emotional/spiritual wringer as a result of the impact of how this process
has been mishandled. The statements about their yeshiva have no doubt been
painful. The talmidim are bright, special young men with incredible talent
and great potential. We truly pray, therefore, that we will all exhibit care
as we approach the issues before us.
It is also not our intent to use the pages of The
Commentator as the means of airing our differences and achieving lines of
communication to YU's administration. This is best realized face to face,
around a table, in an environment of mutual respect.
THE PAST
It is difficult to comment on allegations, going back
some 20 years regarding the unnamed rabbi written about in the recent Commentator
article because, regardless of "The Clues," it is, as The Commentator reiterates
numerous times, "alleged." To our knowledge, whatever took place in the past
has never been adjudicated in a fashion that brought any level of clarity
and closure. Rabbi Katz's understanding of the closing of Kerem, as being
related to financial problems, is in sync with the recollection of many other
Kerem graduates of that period. In addition, we can't even discuss the purported
letter of agreement between the rabbi and Rabbi Svei, let alone accept it
as a support document, when, to this date, no one has brought the actual
letter to the table. Not only was Rabbi Katz not aware of it, but also in
the loop, high profile educators have not seen it or even heard about it.
Such an agreement, of truly significant import, would have, no doubt, established
vigilant gatekeepers on both sides of the ocean. The rabbi has been published
and has actively given shiurim within Israeli yeshivot and for the general
public, in the U.S. and Israel, for over 20 years.
Additionally, we must not take a quantum leap to connect
dots between the allegations and rumors of the past and Derech Etz Chaim.
To our knowledge, there has been no such connection. Indeed, we were told
by a member of the YU administrative panel that the decision was not based
on any complaint against DEC. The concern directly presented to us verbally,
after the receipt of the February 14 notice of non-renewal, and now being
quoted in the press, revolves around the Yeshiva's association with the rabbi
and the perception of a number of YU administrators of the possibility of,
as The Commentator put it, "cases that sound eerily similar." By the same
token, no bridges should be built between a tragic episode in the recent
history of the orthodox community and this situation. There has been no 'bet
din', no impartial investigation, no alleged cover-up, and no panel of
mental-health, educational and legal experts. What we, and now the public,
have been presented with is an in-house, YU driven fait accompli filled with
allegations, rumors, generalities, discrepancies and falsehoods about DEC,
with no venue for redress or even a two-way, balanced discussion.
THE PRESENT
Contrary to the view of the YU administrative team,
the "rabbi" is not the "driving force behind everything." He did give an
open-to-the-public Chumash shiur at DEC until February 20th. He did this
as a volunteer, once a week, for the past four years. Indeed, tens of men
and women, unaffiliated with DEC, attended the shiur in Har Nof at DEC. He
received no remuneration from DEC. He holds no position on the corporation
or faculty. DEC's response was swift and decisive. Literally within hours
of being told by Mr. Michael Kranzler and Rabbi Yosef Blau of YU's concern,
DEC was in contact with the rabbi to inform him of the concerns. He, having
the interests of DEC in mind, offered, and it was immediately agreed to end
any and all association and affiliation, current and future, with the yeshiva.
Obviously, the once a week shiur at the Yeshiva ceased. YU gave no indication
that this action would be sufficient to alleviate the concerns or what other
actions needed to be taken to satisfy continued program participation. This
approach is incomprehensible. The deletions from the website are not, as
The Commentator claims, "in order to downplay his association with DEC."
It is an upfront, honest response to the concern expressed. The website is
a no-win situation. Had we left the pictures on the site - we would have
heard "Ah! You see! He is the Yeshiva!" And now, as we change the page, we
are accused of "downplay." The February 27, DEC, yeshiva-wide shmooze by
Rabbi Katz "that the said rabbi is in no way connected to DEC" is also not
an attempt at "downplay", but an appropriate response by a responsible educator.
DEC takes the concerns of its valued partners seriously and is responsive
to them. It has been, and will always be, the primary and sole desire of
DEC, its leadership and staff, driven by a deep commitment to quality chinuch
and professionalism, to have as our number one concern and priority, the
needs of each and every talmid. They come first. Part of this pursuit of
excellence has been our relationship with Yeshiva University and other quality
institutions, which we feel has been mutually beneficial.
One of the challenges literally thrown at us, in what
some view as a crusade by certain members of the YU administration against
DEC, resides in the realm of ideas, influences, and attitudes, the 'derech'
and 'hashkafot' of DEC. While these administrators have yet to clearly define
what exactly they mean by these terms, we must assume that none of these
influences are related to the allegations against the rabbi. As one administrator
put it, "How can DEC claim or demonstrate, even if the rabbi is no longer
associated with the Yeshiva, that his ideas do not drive the direction of
the Yeshiva?"
DEC has proven itself, during the few years of its
existence, as being a positive Torah and educational experience. Overwhelmingly,
our talmidim have loved their DEC experience and have been launched into
a life of Torah learning. Any complaints about the 'derech' or the 'hashkafa'
must be viewed in this context. Our goal and one which we feel should be
mutually held by YU, is to create committed Torah Jews who will be excited
about learning and will continue to be so after leaving DEC. DEC's track
record speaks for itself. The powerful connect that talmidim have to the
Yeshiva stems from it being the first place where they found this excitement
in Torah study. Something in the DEC formula has made it work. It's no mere
coincidence that DEC alumni have been among the favorites at YU. This feeling
about DEC talmidim has been the case for many 'batei midrash' programs in
the United States that recruit students from Israel.
Essential to this track record of success has been
the DEC faculty of full-time rebbeyim and their openness to ongoing program
evaluation. Contrary to the image portrayed in The Commentator, the rebbeyim
are a diverse group with different teaching styles. Their own post high school,
bet medrash and kollel experiences cover the full landscape of Limud Torah.
They are not all on the same page. As such, they create a healthy learning
environment in which they are willing to listen and to broaden the learning
horizon to meet the needs of talmidim and their future chinuch. The same
dynamism applies to the 'seder halimud' which encompasses a goal oriented,
skills based curriculum of 'gemara b'kiyut'-covering an entire 'mesechta',
'gemara b'iyun', 'chumash', 'navi yomi', 'halacha'-including the development
of 'halacha', 'machshava' and 'musar'.
THE DISAGREEMENT
Our disagreement with Yeshiva University's decision
centers on the following:
-
Derech Etz Chaim has faithfully abided by both the letter and spirit of the S. Daniel Abraham Israel Program Agreement Letter of 2002/2003.
-
Derech Etz Chaim has consistently allowed open access, at all times, to YU representatives and has provided all data in compliance with the agreement. YU rebbeyim and administrators have given shiurim at DEC and have had the opportunity to meet with talmidim and rebbeyim during those visits. In the month of January 2003, the following YU rebbeyim gave shiurim at DEC: January 8th- Rabbi Meir Goldvicht, January 19th- Rabbi Mordechai Willig, and January 21st- Rabbi Herschel Schachter. In addition, Mr. Moshe Kranzler visited us on January 14th. Mark Lehrman and Mordechai Kaplan of YU's Israel office have also been at DEC several times throughout the academic year. This open door policy is not only in keeping with the agreement but is a standard DEC approach in regard to other institutions, the community, DEC parents and alumni.
-
DEC was not informed of even a hint of concern or issue until receipt of a FedEx letter, signed by John B. Fisher, which arrived in Israel on February 14, 2003, one day prior to the deadline for notification of removal from the program. YU administrators, involved in the decision, were fully aware that Rabbi Katz was not in Israel to receive the communication.
-
On February 15, Rabbi Danni Rapp asked Rabbi Katz to attend a meeting. Although Rabbi Katz inquired about the agenda, he was not given any information. He had no reason to assume anything but a routine meeting. The meeting took place on February 16th. Present were three YU administrators, Rabbi Rapp, Mr. Kranzler and Dr. Fisher. He was informed of the decision. His recollection is in consonance with what I was told subsequently by Mr. Kranzler, that due to confidentiality they were unable to disclose the names of those who made the decision. It is therefore interesting to see the full list in The Commentator. Also not shared, although requested, were a description of the process utilized to arrive at the decision, the precise substantiated reasons for the action, and the means of redress. The most I could elicit was that this decision was reached "by YU's 'poskim' and that it was related to DEC's association with the 'rabbi'." It would make no difference if the 'rabbi' were no longer associated with the yeshiva. DEC cannot comprehend this position by YU. If the rabbi is no longer associated with DEC, and if an impartial mechanism is established to determine the disassociation, what then are the issues which stand in the way of rejoining the Joint Israel Program?
-
As noted above, administrators and rebbeyim of YU have visited DEC regularly, have given shiurim and have spoken privately to talmidim. This within the past two and one-half months. I personally discussed DEC with Mr. Kranzler within this time frame. Not a concern was raised. Just the opposite, the comments were most complimentary of the Yeshiva, its program and faculty. If the purpose of these visits has been as the agreement states, "to monitor performance" then, if even the slightest concern arose, anything at all, that might have jeopardized the talmidim in any fashion, we should have been notified immediately. Nothing in our past responses would indicate anything less than full engagement in resolution.
-
The statement reported in The Commentator of a YU insider that "we didn't want to get involved with legal issues," just doesn't represent what was done, how it was done, and the consequences of the actions taken by Yeshiva University through its administration. Investigations are serious matters, especially international ones. The pursuit of truth through impartial, professionally administered investigations can help victims and even the accused. They can hopefully prevent further wrongdoing. But they can also involve legal issues of privacy, defamation of character, loss of livelihood, to name but a few areas of significant import. We must also not forget Hilchot Lashon Harah V'richelut, the closing of a Yeshiva and possible Chilul HaShem. DEC wants the truth. Experience has taught, however, and it is in keeping with good public policy, that impartial, third parties who have significant expertise in the field being investigated must implement investigations. They must be able to investigate with the broadest non-threatening input possible over a reasonable period of time. In all honesty, has this taken place? To this very moment, YU administrator/investigators are giving interviews to the press, making phone calls to convince other institutions to drop DEC, and are sharing unsubstantiated rumors about DEC with families and schools. If the decision is related to the S. Daniel Abraham Israel Program Agreement, and if the case for non-renewal is so compelling that the decision is final, why is this type of activity still going on? Even Rabbi Eidlitz's charges dealing with the past allegations against the rabbi, which were conveyed to Rabbi Rapp, were unrelated to DEC. The same is true of the alleged remarks by Rabbi Pinchos Lipschutz about the existence of an agreement some twenty years ago between the rabbi and Rabbi Svei. We reiterate, the association with the rabbi has ended. Yet, YU administrators have painted both the rabbi and DEC into the same portrait, and continue to do so, through broad stroke allegations and unsubstantiated rumors defying all logic. We must also assume that before the names of alleged victims and their therapists were conveyed to an investigator, that appropriate releases were provided. Does all this bring us to the truth or does it make it impossible for people to clearly separate fact from fiction? We have no reason to question the credentials of the woman expert on child abuse referred to in the article. The Commission and its members are well respected and they provided an important service in a most difficult situation. We would welcome and would value direct input from her so that we can gain through her experience what the D'var Torah said and the full context of her specific concerns. It is disturbing that YU administrators were willing to freely share all this information with The Commentator and other media outlets, but refused to share it with DEC due to confidentiality.
-
The letter sent to parents and schools by YU, and the comments made by its administrators in follow-up calls, are not in keeping with paragraph 20 of the S. Daniel Abraham Israel Agreement which says that "neither party will disparage the other's institution or academic programs, but will be supportive of each other's efforts." We believe that the ensuing process and statements made by YU administrators have been defaming and have violated this and other sections of the Agreement.
-
If, as the letters to parents and feeder schools indicate, "a review of the educational standards and the learning environment at DEC" took place before the decision was reached, we would appreciate having a copy of this review. Given that no specific checklist of educational standards or learning environment criteria are listed in the Agreement, and given that no allegations have been presented to us in writing, we believe it essential, and in keeping with the Agreement, to see them so as to allow us to establish the critical benchmark of affiliation.
-
There is something worrisome about the fact that the letter DEC received on February 14 did not contain any reference to a review, yet the parent and school letters did. Although Mr. Kranzler had assured me on two occasions that I would receive copies of these letters via fax, the commitment was never fulfilled. Why? Parents and schools were surprised that DEC had to call them to get a copy of this critical correspondence. Regardless, the offer by YU to help parents find alternative yeshivot and the wording of the letters, created an atmosphere of alarm and imminent danger. This caused untold worry and damage to DEC parents, talmidim and staff. Again, if there was such heightened concern to necessitate relocation of students without delay, why weren't those concerns shared immediately, not only with parents, but with DEC administrators as well? Why did it wait until February 20th?
-
In The Commentator article, YU administrators make reference to such terms as the "teaching approach", "overall hashkafa", "ideological" and "spiritual backbone" which speak of the rabbi's influence on DEC. To this very moment, no YU administrator has, however, chosen to give us a definitive statement as to the "rabbi's" specific view of these terms and how they differ from attitudes and methods already out there in today's diverse world of yeshivot. As a matter of fact, no YU administrator has even asked the basic question of, "how did DEC decide on this 'derech halimud'?" Besides, how does this concern about the "teaching approach" interface with the allegations being raised? DEC's style of teaching and learning is a comprehensive one selected to assure that its graduates are provided with the means to transition into either the American or Israel yeshiva system. DEC is in ongoing contact with the institutions to which its alumni enroll. This was the first expression of a concern about DEC's style of teaching, and it was registered by YU after the February 14th, non-renewal notice was sent out. Is there not something wrong with such a lack of process and communication when dealing with issues so vital to the future of students and their yeshiva?
-
One of the most perplexing aspects of this tragic and destructive episode is the allegation of DEC being cult-like. Actually, Rabbi Blau, while claiming no expertise in cults and after clearly stating to me that he was not representing YU's administration in any of his comments, stated, "it is a cult." The proof being, for example, that "right after Rabbi Katz was informed of the decision of DEC's non-renewal at YU he met with DEC students." So? "That's what cults do." Further proof, "Rabbi Katz is holding a DEC alumni and parent Shabbaton in Pittsburgh." So? "That's what cults do."
Just as international investigations are serious matters
and require expertise, determining and labeling whether an institution or
group is a cult, is equally as serious a matter requiring expertise. I, too,
am not an expert on cults but my 35 years in chinuch and kiruv work have
allowed me to become somewhat informed. There are any numbers of accepted
models, which identify cult characteristics. Some models can contain anywhere
from 7 to 31 cult characteristics. Choose any one or two of the characteristics
and you can make a cult out of almost any group. Yeshivot and Jewish youth
groups are potentially vulnerable to this misapplication of single
characteristics. For example, one characteristic from the Cult Information
Center is Dress Codes - removing individuality by demanding conformity to
the group dress code. Would we therefore label Day Schools that have dress
codes as cults? These models indicate that even the presence of a charismatic
or messianic leader alone does not make a cult because you need multiple
characteristics in sufficient number followed by an in-depth analysis of
behaviors before applying the title of cult to a group.
The statement by unidentified DEC alumni, "that they
don't go to shiur because only their derech of learning is the correct one"
should not be taken at face value as a sign of a cult. Space does not allow
for a full discussion of this attitude but we need the full context, how
it was said, who said it, and why, before plugging it into the cult formula.
The attitude must also be looked at in the framework of the student's skills,
background, shiur, learning style, rebbe's teaching style, and any current
student learning frustration. As indicated previously, and we repeat the
general concept once again for emphasis; DEC adopted a 'derech' to learning
which it felt appropriate for talmidim coming from Torah day school/high
school experiences across the country, not from classical Mesivtot. We described
it above and a fuller description of this 'derech' is in DEC's brochure.
The challenge for the post-high school DEC Israel program, and we believe
for other yeshivot as well; is, given the students' previous learning
experiences, their high intellectual level, and the one year, maybe two year
window at DEC; how do you get the talmidim into an exciting, lifetime connect
to Torah learning? Hence, the "derech" that seemed to have worked well. Its
application has been diverse because DEC's rebbeyim are all truly different
in their teaching styles and there are different levels of shiurim for the
talmidim. The DEC family of stakeholders, and others from the community at
large, after reading The Commentator article, simply rejects the accusation
that DEC is a cult or even cult-like. Actually, the paper's accusation is
reckless and libelous. The defaming remarks being made in conversations with
parents and schools by YU administrators in this regard, as reported to us,
do not reflect the reality on the ground at DEC. These administrators know
full well that this cult accusation is ridiculous, and yet, they persist
in a campaign of misinformation, sowing the seeds of fear, to prove their
point of view regardless of any proof or expertise in the field of cults.
One YU administrator has gone as far as making the accusation that I and
others, who have stepped forward to help DEC, are under the control of and
are being manipulated by the "rabbi". This is beyond the absurd. It is an
unwarranted, personal attack with no basis in fact.
Anyone with even superficial knowledge of DEC, knows
of its diverse student body, its openness to the public, its facilitation
of parent visits to Israel and the Yeshiva, its invitations to a cross-section
of rebbeyim and baal habatim to address the talmidim, its encouragement of
visits by feeder school principals, its regular widely distributed student
driven newsletters, its ongoing contact with alumni and parents, and its
consideration of a wide choice of post DEC learning opportunities. These
characteristics are simply not associated with cults or cult-like experiences.
The word cult conjures up frightening images of Waco
and Jonestown, of arsenic-laced Kool-Aid, mind control, and rejection of
family and friends. Having a rebbe does not make people cultists or clones.
We all know this. Hopefully, individuals and institutions are judged by their
own actions and behaviors. More than caution needs to be exercised before
the term cult is used in any discussion, let alone in the making of even
a partial allegation against an institution or individual.
12. There are any numbers of statements made in the
article, which require clarification. But, just one at this time. Rabbi Katz,
was blessed with two wonderful parents, Rabbi Dovid Z"L, who was niftar when
Rabbi Aharon Katz was 18 years old, and Mildred Katz 'l'hebadel ben chaim
l'chaim', incredible people in their own right who "effectively raised him
since his teenage years." The entire Katz family had already made 'aliya'
to Israel at the time of Kerem's closing.
THE FUTURE
We continue to value our relationships with the community
of post-DEC institutions in which our alumni enroll. We feel that we have
been, and will continue to be, loyal and good partners to all of them. Most
importantly, we are prepared to work in a spirit of determination and cooperation
to set the record straight as part of our responsibility to our constituency.
We realize that this will not be an easy task. But DEC feels its commitment
to the pursuit of excellence, its devoted alumni, current students, families,
faculty and supporters, coupled with a track record of quality education
and open communication; clearly makes the case for continued growth and ongoing
strategic alliances with partnering institutions that service our graduates.
a) We will be in contact with all the institutions
to which our alumni enroll, to gain their valuable input on student transition
to their programs. DEC will bring to bear any additional resources necessary
within DEC to be cooperative and responsive to our valued partners and
constituency.
b) The rabbi's shiur is no longer taking place at DEC
and any affiliation and association has ended.
c) We ask that the highest level of leadership at Yeshiva
University review the process which led to this decision and reconsider positions
being quoted in the media regarding any possibility of discussion between
YU and DEC in the present or future.
The Commentator raised the point of "what many have
called an effective death penalty for the Yeshiva" as the possible result
of this decision by Yeshiva University. Death penalty! We hope not. Perhaps
the more appropriate phrase is 'dinay n'fashot'. The decision that has been
made by the YU review committee literally speaks to life and death issues.
It is not simply whether DEC closes its doors. There are people behind those
doors - alumni, current talmidim and their parents, rebbeyim; their wives
and children, and supporters who are being affected by this decision at this
very moment and may be for years to come. I posed this concern to Rabbi Blau.
"I am not sure you will achieve your goal of hurting the rabbi, but I know
that what is being done and how it is being done may potentially destroy
the DEC rebbeyim and their families, and the Talmidim who are not part of
these allegations. These situations take on a life of their own." The response,
"I know what I have to do, you do what you have to do." At a subsequent meeting
with Rabbi Blau in Israel involving Rabbi Katz and Rabbi Yosef Leibowitz,
who is a YU 'musmach', veteran educator, and father of a DEC rebbe; the request
was made to submit the questions surrounding DEC to Gedolay Yisroel. As of
yet, we have not received a response. Is this not an appropriate venue when
dealing with such weighty issues and the need for impartiality? We believe
that this meeting with Rabbi Blau did not provide for a fair hearing of DEC's
position as any and all positive suggestions for resolution fell on deaf
ears. This was also the case with DEC's recommendation to establish a "contract"
to facilitate renewed Israel program participation which was rejected. Rather
than receive any serious consideration of the suggestions, the response has
been to attack DEC more vigorously than ever before. Rabbi Blau has justified
his actions by stating, "there is some level of suspicion and some level
of risk, and that is enough to react." Yes, we must all react. But, even
in today's environment of heightened, correct sensitivity to certain behaviors
and the need for appropriate, vigorous response to them, there must be a
just and equitable process involved before the death penalty or any penalty
is delivered. This should surely be the case when no such allegations have
been made against DEC.
Death penalty! We, with 'siyata dishmaya', are committed
to a different reality. We are not na?ve. We do not have Yeshiva University's
resources. We are a small yeshiva that really wants to get back to full time
focus on the talmidim, their learning and their spiritual growth. The rumors
and allegations, media interviews, phone calls, letters, and lack of any
avenue for redress; make this vital task almost unachievable in the current
environment. But, DEC is a wonderful Mosad HaTorah. It has great energy,
exciting ruach, meaningful vision, a healthy learning environment, fantastic
rebbeyim and rebbetzins, terrific talmidim, loyal parents, alumni and supporters.
DEC is now faced with an incomprehensible set of challenges. Those who know
us have seen incredible resolve to build a special Makom Torah and we will
apply this resolve to meet these challenges as well. We are committed to
exert our fullest energy and resources to the pursuit of "emes", the continued
building of DEC and to working with all institutions for the benefit of our
talmidim. We humbly ask for your 'tefillot' for 'siyata dishmaya' and
support.
Panel scheduled to hear charges against rabbi
By THE JERUSALEM POST STAFF
Jerusalem Post - May. 2, 2003
A panel of rabbis was scheduled on Thursday to hear
testimony in Brooklyn from several former students of Rabbi Matis Weinberg,
a prominent American-born Torah scholar, who is alleged to have made sexual
advances toward them and others, New York's The Jewish Week reported
Thursday.
Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky, a leading rabbi in Philadelphia,
arranged the proceedings at the urging of alleged victims and their supporters,
and a prominent Los Angeles rabbi who once worked with Rabbi Weinberg, a
number of sources told The Jewish Week.
Rabbi Weinberg, whose books on the Bible and Jewish
thought are widely read and praised, denies all the charges, which span a
25-year period. He told The Jewish Week he did not believe any rabbinic panel
was taking place and he expressed frustration at the allegations made against
him.
Among those who were scheduled to testify is "Sammy,"
a 20-year-old former student at Derech Etz Chaim, a small Jerusalem yeshiva
with which Weinberg, 56, is loosely affiliated.
Sammy told The Jewish Week the rabbi kissed him on
the lips at least once, and climbed into his bed when the two were alone
in a room during an excursion this winter.
He said it was only later, after denying to himself
that any misconduct had taken place, that "I realized I had been lying to
myself." Sammy later told a rabbi he trusted and his parents about the
incidents.
_________________________________________________________________________________Condemning Abuse - Weinberg family takes action to protect victims of abuse.
Phil Jacobs, Editor
Baltimore Jewish Times - May 1, 2003
One particular line on the plaque stands out: "Klal Yisroel
owes a tremendous debt of gratitude to Rebbetzin Weinberg for raising the
painful issue of domestic violence in the Orthodox community, both locally
in her home city of Baltimore and nationwide. This widespread problem was
kept hidden for too long by our own denial, but Rebbetzin Weinberg confronted
the issue in a quiet, dignified and practical way, and rabbis, organizational
leadership and lay people are now responding and taking action."
On a cool spring day when the founder and trailblazer
of the Jewish domestic abuse organization CHANA and her therapist daughter,
Dr. Aviva Weisbord, would have rather been talking about the upcoming Passover
holidays, the discussions turned painfully too close to home.
"We strongly condemn any and all abuse by anybody against
anybody at any time in any place in any form," said Mrs. Weinberg.
Her statement came amid the backdrop of improprieties
allegedly committed by her son, Rabbi Matis Weinberg. (see
main story) Her family is participating in the process of putting together
a panel of rabbis and heads of yeshivot both in the United States and Israel
to act as a clearinghouse for victims of abuse.
The Weinbergs, along with the rabbis, plan to produce
a central phone number that can be used by those who feel victimized so that
cases can be heard and investigated. "The idea is to protect people and to
make them feel they can come forward," said Dr. Weisbord.
Note from Vicki Polin:
The Awareness Center wants to point out that there are inherent problems with the approach of dealing with allegations of sexual abuse suggested by the Weinbergs. We are firm believer that in any community (including the observant world), when an individual suspects child abuse and/or neglect, they should be mandated to call child abuse hot-lines in their community immediately. This will insure that evidence does not become contaminated.
Calling law enforcement officals is the only way to be sure that there are no cover-ups or biases. This is one way to insure that individuals do not investigate allegations against friends, colleagues, and/or family members). Child Protection workers are highly skilled, highly trained professionals who know how to collect forensic evidence to determine if a case is valid and/or if there is enough evidence to press criminal charges. Child Protection workers know how to do forensic victim-sensitive interviews with victims of all ages (without accidentally asking leading questions).
It makes sense that variousJewish community may want to develop some sort of liason relationship with the child protection agency in their area. This is one way to insure that the workers have an understanding of our cultural differences For the sake of our children, we need to use the systems that are in place.
Executive Director - The Awareness Center
Affection Or Abuse?
'I Never Felt Threatened' - A student of Rabbi Matis Weinberg stands by his 'rebbe.'
'I Never Felt Threatened' - A student of Rabbi Matis Weinberg stands by his 'rebbe.'
by Phil Jacobs, Editor
Baltimore Jewish Times - May 1, 2003
Elly Oberstein, 25, first learned of Rabbi Matis Weinberg through his books and tape recordings. It was in his first year at Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Pikesville that Mr. Oberstein, who is now studying at Ohio State University for his medical degree, met Rabbi Weinberg.
This started a close relationship that continues today,
some eight years later. Rabbi Weinberg officiated at Mr. Oberstein's wedding.
And there almost isn't a day when Mr. Oberstein doesn't listen to a tape
of a Rabbi Weinberg lecture.
"When I first met Rabbi Weinberg, I was instantly enveloped
by him in a great bear hug," said Mr. Oberstein. "I must admit that I had
not expected this reaction. I was not surprised by the nature of the contact
because there are other rabbis, especially in the more Chasidic-inspired
areas of Judaism, who have greeted me in a similar manner. Rather, I was
not expecting this response because Rabbi Weinberg was not part of that
culture.
"I was more attracted to the stricter learning and analysis
that is the hallmark of Ner Israel. And in that setting, physical shows of
emotion are frowned upon. As teenagers in yeshiva, we were not encourage
to explore our developing sexuality and we carefully glossed over the many
references to desire that appear in the Torah and the Talmud."
Rabbi Leonard Oberstein |
"During this time, I developed a very close relationship
with my rebbe, one that made me feel more like a son than a student," said
Mr. Oberstein. "But after seeing so many students of Rabbi Weinberg's emerge
with the same feeling, I suspect that perhaps this is what it means to be
a student of a rabbi who places such great value on relationships in addition
to study and knowledge. I certainly feel that I have a close personal connection
to Rabbi Weinberg and that he is someone I can turn to with my problems,
someone to offer a sympathetic hug or a blessing on a Friday night.
"But in all of those years, I never felt threatened
by this contact, nor did I feel that it ever affect my ability to have
relationships with other friends and teachers."
Mr. Oberstein added that since moving to Columbus,
Oh., there have been at least five occasions when after mentioning Rabbi
Weinberg's name, there have been others who have recalled their own meaningful
encounters with him
"I suspect that in my initial encounters with Rabbi
Weinberg and in many other people's encounters, we gained a perspective that
went beyond the subject at hand," Mr. Oberstein said. "Many people who I
speak to feel that in hearing Rav Weinberg teach Torah, they appreciated
some of the possibilities that the Jewish tradition offers. These are people
who have experienced a broad range of other fields, and they sense that Rabbi
Weinberg teaches honesty, that he seeks to find the Torah relevant to issues
that are at the forefront of the modern world. To me, it continues to be
a tragedy that anyone would try to stifle such a message."
Mr. Oberstein said that all along, it is his rebbe's
honesty that speaks to him. The rabbi, he said, encourages his students to
consider sources. "His influence on my thinking is pervasive," said Mr.
Oberstein.
For example, the story of Abraham smashing his father's
idols. "He didn't teach me to go around smashing idols. He believes, though,
that idols were projections and false beliefs, and he taught me to be wary
of someone injecting false information. Look at the context and trace it
to its source.
"In another way," he continued, "I felt that anything
part of our Judaism was part of our learning. In a yeshiva sense, you think
of learning Jewish law as the main thing we do as Jews. In the world I lived
in with him, every single element was just as important to be lived as a
Jew. We took time off to go to an orchard to pick essrogim. We baked matzohs
for Pesach. Learning from my rebbe was part of a journey about truth and
what God wants from us."
Mr. Oberstein said that the hugs he receive were unexpected
but they were "genuine. You sense when something is genuine. The hard part
of the issue is for everyone to know what's genuine."
He said Rabbi Weinberg never attempted any inappropriate
physical gesture in the years that he lived with him, Rabbi' Weinberg's wife,
Tzippora, and some members or all of their 10 children. An occasional kiss
on the forehead as part of a Shabbat blessing was all that he ever
experienced.
"Many people I met were students of his who spoke to
him and saw him in Israel," Mr. Oberstein said. "I knew he had a lot of students
who had a relationship of 20 years with him. But there was never any suggestions
that anything was wrong. But there were a couple of people in Baltimore,
when I came home for a holiday, who when they heard I was associated with
Rabbi Weinberg, they rolled their eyes."
Mr. Oberstein said that he looks to the Ethics of Our
Fathers and the teaching "judge someone for the benefit of good" when it
comes to a situation such as this.
"I am comfortable assuming good things," he said. "What
I saw in five years with he and his family was reality. What rankles me a
lot is that this all must be painful for him and his family. I've called
and told him that I loved him. I don't view that as a violation. I don't
view my relationship with him as a negative. I hope that people will still
be able to benefit from his teachings."
__________________________________________________________________________________
Panel To Hear Charges Against Prominent
Rabbi
Former students accuse Matis Weinberg of sexual
abuse in California and Jerusalem.
Rabbi Matis Weinberg: Scion of a noted rabbinic
family denies charges, says accusers are troubled.
by Elli Wohlgelernter and Gary Rosenblatt
Jewish Week - April 20, 2003
Jewish Week - April 20, 2003
Allege Sexual Predator - Rabbi Matis Weinber (Now and Then) |
Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky, enabler of sex offenders |
Some of the victims say they are seeking rabbinic
endorsement to pursue their charges in criminal court or in an Israeli din
Torah (religious tribunal), or both.
Rabbi Weinberg, whose books on the Bible and Jewish
thought are widely read and praised, denies all the charges, which span a
25-year period. He told The Jewish Week he did not believe any rabbinic panel
was taking place and he expressed frustration at the allegations made against
him.
Rabbi Weinberg noted that while he was physically
demonstrative to his students, often hugging them, it was never in a sexual
way.
"I don't get a hard-on" from such encounters," asserted
the rabbi, who is married and has a large family.
Among those scheduled to testify May 1 is "Sammy,"
a 20-year-old former student at Derech Etz Chaim, a small Jerusalem yeshiva
for post-high school American students with which Rabbi Weinberg, 56, is
loosely affiliated. He has been a rebbe to several of the rabbis teaching
at the school and is considered its spiritual mentor.
Sammy and several other men have spoken at length with
The Jewish Week on the condition of anonymity.
Sammy said the rabbi kissed him on the lips at least
once, and climbed into his bed when the two were alone and shared a room
during an excursion in Israel this winter. He said he had been close to Rabbi
Weinberg and his family and had been a frequent Shabbat guest at their home
during his time as a student at the yeshiva, looking up to the rabbi as his
religious guide and leader.
At various times when they were alone, the rabbi would
"lift my eyeglasses and kiss me slowly and purposefully on my eyelids or
my ears, or pinch me affectionately above the waist," Sammy said, noting
that these gestures made him feel uncomfortable. "But he was my rebbe, and
part of me felt almost flattered" at the attention, he added.
He said it was only later, after denying to himself
that any misconduct had taken place, that "I realized I had been lying to
myself."
Sammy later told a rabbi he trusted and his parents
about the incidents.
On another front, Yeshiva University severed its
affiliation with Derech Etz Chaim in February for its ties with Rabbi Weinberg
and for allegedly seeking to downplay the complaints.
Rabbi Yosef Blau |
The YU newspaper, The Commentator, ran a lengthy piece
in March about the school severing ties because of "compelling evidence"
of a rabbi associated with Derech Etz Chaim having "a history of allegedly
sexually abusing and engaging in cult-like behavior with his students." The
article did not name the rabbi.
Officials of the Israeli yeshiva and several students
complained that YU acted hastily and unfairly.
Two of the eight rebbes at Derech Etz Chaim are said
to have left their posts over the controversy. One, Rabbi Avraham Schorr,
gathered his students at his home one morning last month to tell them he
was leaving because of the scandal, according to someone who was present.
Rabbi Schorr did not return calls from The Jewish Week.
He was one of many people related to the case who chose not to discuss the
matter.
Reluctant To Speak Out
This story has come to light slowly, in fits and starts,
over a period of months, hindered by a reluctance of the alleged victims
and their supporters to speak out publicly. They express fear of condemnation
for chilul Hashem (desecration of God's name), and personal embarrassment
or recrimination in the Orthodox world for criticizing a major scholar who
has reached countless Jews in positive ways through his lectures and writings.
"Why should I be victimized twice?" one former student
said, noting that he would be shunned in the Orthodox community were he to
come forward with his name.
At the same time, these critics say they want Rabbi
Weinberg's alleged misdeeds to be widely known so that no student in the
future will be harmed.
Dozens of supporters of Rabbi Weinberg have written
or called The Jewish Week over the last several weeks to vouch for his reputation
as a brilliant, charismatic scholar with a sterling character and to decry
what they consider to be a campaign to besmirch him.
Ari Hier of Los Angeles, a student of Rabbi Weinberg
in Santa Clara, Calif., in the 1970s, describes his rebbe as a warm, caring
and innovative educator.
"He is unconventional in his teaching," Hier said,
noting that it was easy to see why the deeply conservative establishment
of the yeshiva world would look askance at a rebbe who quoted pop music lyrics
or cited Hollywood movies in his lectures and writings.
Indeed, Hier compared Rabbi Weinberg to the Robin Williams
character in the film "Dead Poets Society," a teacher who prodded his students
into deeper understanding of literature, and themselves, by being outrageous
at times.
Rabbi Weinberg, in an interview with The Jewish Week,
used the "Dead Poets" analogy as well. One thing that he, his supporters
and critics agree on is that he is a maverick. But while his defenders portray
him as a brilliant, caring rabbi, his critics say he was authoritarian and
manipulative, emotionally and psychologically, in addition to the sexual
charges.
Persistent Rumors
Ner Israel Rabbinical College and High School |
"My approach is to be open, open to criticism, open
to questions," Rabbi Weinberg said in the interview. He described the Kerem
method as "experimental" but said he taught "with utmost transparency."
Rabbi Weinberg settled in Israel after he left Kerem.
There were persistent rumors at the time that the rabbi was forced out suddenly.
Some say it was because of financial problems at the yeshiva. Others insist
that Rabbi Weinberg was found to have made sexual advances toward students
and that an oral agreement was reached where the rabbi agreed to leave the
country and stop working with young people and in return, no charges would
be filed against him with civil authorities.
Rabbi Weinberg said the charges are baseless and that
he made the move because he always intended to live in Israel.
While he initially denied all charges of any kind of
abuse as "absurd," the rabbi did acknowledge, when questioned, that he had
slapped a Kerem student hard, repeatedly, in the mouth, drawing blood in
front of a large group of students. He said the student had asked to be
"embarrassed publicly" because he had violated the school ban on smoking,
and Rabbi Weinberg agreed, reluctantly, to punish him physically.
"I agree it's strange," he said. "I'm more mature now
and I wouldn't do this now.
"I was a creative teacher," and "it worked," he added.
Rabbi Weinberg also admitted that he had once extinguished
a burnt cigarette in the palm of a student's hand.
But he was adamant about there being "no sexual
connotation" to the frequent hugs and kisses he gave students, noting that
this was California in the '70s, and that "I am a physical person, that's
just the way I am." He said "it makes me feel ugly and violated to take something
warm and caring and turn it into something furtive and disgusting."
Asked if he ever kissed students on the lips, as some
have charged, he responded: "How long?"
When questioned about specific incidents of alleged
sexual contact, Rabbi Weinberg volunteered the names of the former students
and portrayed them as psychologically troubled. He said that Sammy, the
20-year-old, and his family had a "troubled history" and that his own children
worried that Sammy was "like Neil," a character in "Dead Poets Society" who
commits suicide.
Rabbi Weinberg charged that Sammy has been "emotionally
abused by rabbis and others who have an agenda" in seeking to make sexual
charges out of innocent gestures, like rubbing the young man's back or shoulders.
A rabbi close to Sammy said the young man is part of
"a normal, stable and loving family," and that while he knew Rabbi Weinberg
and respected him, he has come to believe that Sammy is telling the truth.
Rabbi Weinberg said that another former student from
his Kerem days who has made allegations against him was "a problematic young
man" with a "violent" nature and was not credible.
That student, "Adam," now 40, told The Jewish Week
that when he was 17, Rabbi Weinberg led him by the hand to his private study
in the yeshiva, "pushed me on the bed or sofa and literally got on top of
me, grappled me all over my body as a man would with a woman he was passionate
about. I went into a catatonic shock. He fell asleep and slept on me for
hours."
Adam said that afterward, "it was as if nothing ever
happened," but he felt "an implicit sense" that he had lost favor with his
rebbe.
"I wasn't there for him physically so he wasn't there
for me emotionally, and there was a sense of abandonment," Adam said. Most
damaging, he said, was that "he was playing with my head. That was most
inviolate."
Act Of Closure
Contemporaries and former classmates of Adam tell similar
stories of alleged abuse from Rabbi Weinberg, whom they revered as a rebbe.
"It's very vivid in my mind," said "Avraham," recalling
the incident that took place in 1981, when he was 15, in a back room in the
dormitory that was reserved for Rabbi Weinberg.
Avraham said the rabbi said he wanted to talk to him.
"He started unbuttoning my shirt, kissing my chest and stuff, started unbuttoning
my pants, and he started to fondle me. I basically freaked out and I left."
He said he later remembered feeling that the rabbi
"was making this out to be ... some type of spiritual or religious experience."
"Yitzchak," another former Kerem student, recalled
three incidents of alleged touching that continues to haunt him more than
20 years later. The first took place in the dormitory in May 1982 when the
rabbi came in and fondled the youngster's private parts, he said, while making
"guttural, love-making noises."
Yitzchak said he was "totally in shock. ... Obviously
it wasn't normal, it was obviously something that was wrong, but I didn't
understand it."
A very similar event occurred a year later at a yeshiva
in the Old City of Jerusalem, he said, when he was getting dressed in the
dorm. He said Rabbi Weinberg "came into the room, gave me a hug, hands inside
the robe, fondling me again."
Yitzchak said he was confused because he felt that
to break away from Rabbi Weinberg was "like breaking off from the path of
enlightenment, your opportunity to really develop fully as a Jew."
But after another encounter two months later in the
rabbi's home, "I was gone," he said, and soon left the school.
Six or seven years later, Yitzchak felt a need to confront
Rabbi Weinberg, he said. When he next saw the rabbi, "he tried to tell me
that I enjoyed it, that I wanted it."
Yitzchak said it was "a liberating experience" for
him to see the rabbi "squirm."
"It was an act of closure," he said.
Moving Forward
But several of the other alleged victims say they are
pursuing the case now because they are still troubled emotionally by the
long-ago encounters and feel a strong need to try to protect young men from
being harmed in the future. They note that a number of the alleged incidents
of sexual abuse took place at the Kerem yeshiva and that California has no
statute of limitations on such crimes.
Rabbi Eliezer Eidlitz |
Rabbi Eidlitz was planning to be at the May 1 panel
in New York and said his purpose is "to protect people from being molested.
I have to put my own feelings and emotions aside to be able to accomplish
that goal."
He said he is dedicated to "doing what is needed to
end this disgusting type of act in the frum community."
Rabbi Blau of Yeshiva University noted that while the
community "has become sensitized to the problems of abuse since the [Rabbi
Baruch] Lanner scandal [three years ago], we are still lacking a clear and
effective mechanism to deal with allegations of abuse that protects the victims
while filtering out frivolous accusations."
He said that only when there is success in dealing
with these problems internally, without fear that the offender will simply
move somewhere else and repeat his behavior, can "we discuss dealing with
issues in privacy." Until that time, he said, "only public exposure is effective
in protecting the community from abusers."
Rabbi Blau called it "a misapplication of chilul Hashem"
to worry more about communal embarrassment than "protecting future potential
victims at risk."
Aviva Weisborg, PhD |
They said they plan to help form a panel of rabbis
and professionals, including women, to act as a clearinghouse of abuse complaints
and to appoint investigators to look into allegations. Weisbord said she
would like to see a system of checks and balances, so that if parties are
not satisfied with the results of the panel's probe, "they can go to the
press."
"We would like to minimize chilul Hashem," she said,
"but the first priority is that children have to be protected." n
Elli Wohlgelernter is a former editor and reporter at The Jerusalem Post. Gary Rosenblatt is editor and publisher of The Jewish Week.
Finally, Steps Toward
Confronting Abuse - Weinberg panel hears testimony; Orthodox groups planning
responses.
Gary Rosenblatt - Editor and Publisher
The Jewish Week (05/09/2003)
Rabbi Moshe Hauer of Baltimore, one of three rabbis
who met in Brooklyn last week to hear testimony from alleged victims of a
noted Jerusalem Torah scholar, said the information gathered will be sent
on to a bet din in Israel to deal with the matter.
At least six men testified here on May 1 that they
were abused by Rabbi Matis Weinberg, scion of a
prominent
Baltimore rabbinic family and himself a widely known and admired rebbe,
lecturer and author who lives in the Old City.
Three men made their claims to the bet din in person
and three by phone — one from California, one from Israel and one, who
is ill, from New York. They were former yeshiva students from the recent
as well as the more distant past, and they provided details, some graphic,
charging that the rabbi made advances toward them, or sought to,
sexually.
Rabbi Weinberg, whose father and grandfather both served
as rosh yeshiva of the Ner Israel Rabbinical College in Baltimore, was not
present or represented before the rabbinic panel, which apparently does not
plan to pass judgment.
The members of the panel — Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky
of Philadelphia, Rabbi Feivel Cohen of Brooklyn and Rabbi Hauer — did
not tell those who testified what they intend to do with the
information.
But Rabbi Hauer told The Jewish Week on Monday that
the purpose of the bet din was "to receive testimony with regard to the
allegations" and to send that testimony "to a bet din in [Rabbi Weinberg's]
jurisdiction" in Israel, "where [the religious courts] are more organized
than here."
Whether such an outcome would be perceived as passing
the buck or advancing the case is open to interpretation.
"It's true that religious courts here have little clout,"
said one leading American rabbi, "but the downside [of shifting the case
to Israel] is that the community here seems more sensitized to these issues."
Some Israeli observers say the procedures in Israel are far from systematic.
(See story on how Israel is dealing with rabbinic sexual abuse on page
36.)
Several of the men who testified said they came with
the intention of seeking an endorsement from the rabbinic panel to press
criminal charges in this country, but Rabbi Hauer said "that wasn't requested
of our group."
Even as the Orthodox community was shaken by the latest
report of alleged sexual abuse by a well-known rabbi, a number of religious
leaders were talking about various plans to create a communal mechanism for
evaluating and acting on such allegations.
But "talking" is still the operative word.
Almost three years after the Baruch Lanner scandal
came to light, there is still no prescribed method for reporting abuse, no
recognized group to inform, no standing panel or task force to investigate
charges and make recommendations, and no clear answer from rabbinic leaders
about when to come forward and when to keep quiet.
Certainly there has been more awareness among parents
and groups working with teens as a result of media attention given to the
Lanner case. The Orthodox Union, the parent organization of the National
Conference of Synagogue Youth, where Rabbi Lanner worked with teens for three
decades, has instituted a number of changes designed to prevent further problems.
They include training programs for youth counselors, greater parental involvement
and an ombudsman position to monitor complaints.
Rabbi
Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice president of the OU, said the "major
components NCSY has put in place — defined written standards, a system
of investigation and due process, and disciplinary measures — are lacking"
in most communal organizations.
He would like to see an overarching panel or group
to deal with abuse allegations within the community, noting that the OU and
its rabbinical arm, the Rabbinical Council of America, are "talking about
what we should do, but we still haven't done it yet."
What has changed, he said, is that "the community as
a whole is no longer surprised" when it reads stories of rabbinic abuse.
Until now, though, rabbinic leadership has been slow
to act, seeking instead to ignore or downplay the problem, fearful of public
attention, embarrassment or offending a colleague. Some rabbis contend the
issue is being overly dramatized by the press.
Alleged victims of abuse have said their complaints
to rabbinic authorities about mistreatment at the hands of rabbis have been
denied, squelched, hushed up or, at best, dealt with quietly and locally,
allowing the perpetrator to move on to another unsuspecting community.
Some people have turned to journalists in search of
justice and communal exposure. With a vacuum in the community, it has fallen
on the press to fill it, however reluctantly.
But change seems to be in the air. The Rabbinical Council
of America will hold a session on sexual abuse in the rabbinate at its national
convention at the end of this month. The goal is "to address the issue seriously
within our ranks," said
Rabbi Mark Dratch
of Stamford, Conn., who is chairing the session.
"We have to find ways to protect the integrity of the
congregation, the rabbi and the community," he said, adding that "there may
have been resistance before but the membership is more sensitive now."
Rabbi
Heshie Billet, president of the RCA, said the session was motivated by
the arrest in February of Rabbi Israel Kestenbaum, who was charged with
attempting to disseminate indecent material to a minor, and concerns about
another member of the rabbinic group who is alleged to have abused children
in previous posts.
Rabbi Billet said he realized his group has no active
committee to deal with evaluating and removing members. He said he is determined
to put in place professional standards and policies to rectify the situation.
But as Rabbi Dratch pointed out, "there still needs to be a lot of conversation"
about how best to proceed.
Another session at the convention will focus on rabbinic
conduct and how rabbis should protect themselves legally and deal with the
press.
Further to the right on the Orthodox spectrum, the
Agudath Israel has not dealt with the issue of rabbinical sexual abuse directly
at a convention and is less inclined to institute any kind of centralized
body to deal with the problem, according to spokesman Rabbi Avi Shafran.
Complainants would be encouraged to "go to the rebbe or community rabbi"
on an individual basis, he said. (Rabbi Kaminetsky, one of the three rabbis
on the Rabbi Weinberg bet din, is a member of the Council of Torah Sages
of Agudah, and Rabbi Cohen, also serving on the ad hoc bet din, is a member
of Agudah as well.)
Torah Umesorah, the national network of yeshivas and
Hebrew day schools, is holding its annual convention next week and for the
first time will distribute formal guidelines for dealing with abuse, according
to executive vice president Rabbi Joshua Fishman. He noted that the organization
has dealt with the problem for a number of years and will include a closed-door
session this year.
Dr. Aviva Weisbord, a psychologist in Baltimore and
sister of Rabbi Weinberg, said she and other members of her family are working
toward establishing a two-tiered mechanism to deal with sexual abuse in the
Orthodox community. Allegations would be addressed to a group of distinguished
rabbis, she said, who then would appoint trained professionals to investigate
and make recommendations, which the rabbinic body would then act on.
As a form of "checks and balances," Weisbord said,
" it would be understood that if people were not satisfied with the results,
they could go to the civil courts or the press."
Weisbord acknowledged that there was "ingrained resistance"
from some of the rabbis who have been approached. "They recognize the need
but have been reluctant to sign on," she noted. "It will have to be done
one by one."
Richard Joel, the incoming president of Yeshiva University
who chaired the OU's special commission in the Lanner case, welcomed recent
developments, calling it "a giant step forward for the community to engage
in investigating [allegations of abuse] and showing concern for our children."
He said he would welcome "an entity that would be independent enough to act
with strength as well as discretion."
Rabbi
Yosef Blau, mashgiach ruchani (spiritual adviser) at Yeshiva University,
has long advocated for a communal task force to deal with abuse. He asserts
that such halachic concerns as chilul Hashem (embarrassment to the community)
and lashon hara (spreading gossip) are trumped by the imperative — religious
and moral — of putting the protection of children first.
One would hope that for all the divisions within the
community, its leaders could make security for children a priority and find
ways to work together to diminish the potential for future tragedies.
One of the alleged victims who testified at the bet
din here last week said that while the rabbis who questioned him were "stern
and autocratic" in their manner, he was not intimidated.
"I asked them, `what if it was your children or
grandchildren?'" he said, "and they were silent."
Gary Rosenblatt's e-mail address is
Gary@jewishweek.org.
by Staff Report
Baltimore Jewish Times - May 9, 2003
Rabbi Moshe Hauer, spiritual leader of Bnai Jacob Shaarei
Zion in Upper Park Heights, was one of three rabbis who met in Brooklyn,
N.Y., last week to hear testimony from alleged victims of a noted Jerusalem
Torah scholar, according to an article first appearing Wednesday on
www.TheJewishWeek.com, the website of the New York Jewish Week.
Rabbi Hauer said that information gathered by the panel
will be sent on to a beit din, or rabbinical court, in Israel to deal with
the matter.
"Our role was simply to collect testimony from the
people here on this side of the ocean and to hand it over to a beit din in
his jurisdiction in Jerusalem," Rabbi Hauer told the Baltimore Jewish
Times.
Rabbi Weinberg was not present or represented before
the panel, which apparently does not plan to pass judgment.
The panel members included: Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky
of Philadelphia, Rabbi Feivel Cohen of Brooklyn and Rabbi Hauer.
What happens now to the testimony sent to Israel has
not yet been made clear.
"We're working that out," said Rabbi Hauer. "But we
are making it clear that we are very concerned about issues of sexual abuse,
and we're working to get it handled in a truly responsible way."
The Commentator - Yeshiva University
May 18, 2003 - Iyar 5763 - Volume 67, Issue
12
The Responsibility of Arvut
To the Editors:
I am writing in response to the letters that were printed
as retort to your Derech Etz Chaim article. I am not giving my opinion on
the article itself. Whether the offender is guilty or not, I commend the
fact that you had the courage to print the article in the face of such
opposition. It's such a distressing fact when the Jewish community feels
that they have to "cover up" scandals of such magnitude in order to "save
face". Are we that scared of what other people think that we're willing to
sacrifice the emotional and, perhaps, physical well being of our fellow man,
woman, and child? We speak of the atrocities that the Catholic Church and
its hierarchy did in order to cover up its atrocious scandals, which emotionally
scarred hundreds of people and perhaps turned them away from religion. One
of the main differences I've learned between Jews and other religions, such
as Catholicism and Christianity, is that adherents of the others feel that
their religious leaders are God-like. They're infallible, above reproach,
and holier than other mere mortals to the point where they claim that they
do not have the same weaknesses and desires. I was taught that Judaism holds
the opposite view. Rabbis are not celibate. They can't join monasteries.
They live in the real world with the rest of us. They're still human beings
just like you or I. However, they are experts in the field of paskining Torah
and its encompassing halachot. Just because someone has the title of rabbi
or talmid chacham attached to his name doesn't mean that he's somehow transformed
into one who can't succumb to human weaknesses. Yes, he has the responsibility
to be a role model, guide, and teacher for the Jewish community in this time
of galut. Yet, it is the Jewish community's duty as a nation to protect each
other and force our leaders to be accountable for their actions and ensure
that it doesn't happen again in the future. Kol yisrael arevim zeh lazeh.
We are responsible for each other. What happens to one Jew happens to all
Jews. When one Jew suffers, we all suffer. Is a Rabbi's name more important
to us than a victim's soul? How many Jewish spirits are we willing to sacrifice
to make sure dirty secrets and skeletons remain hidden and locked in a closet?
I wonder how many people have turned away from Judaism because the rest of
the Jewish world and its leaders were silent to their suffering. I hear time
and time again, "it can't happen here", or "we're Jews, we don't do that".
Just because we're Jews doesn't mean that we live in some protective bubble
that makes us immune to such horrors as domestic violence, molestation, child
abuse, etc. Those that believe this are going to have their bubble popped
sooner or later. Right here, right now, we can stop the bleeding. We have
to see this as a wake up call. I put it to the entire Jewish community to
take a stand to ensure that our children and future generations will be protected
from those that wish to hurt them. I ask again, how many Jewish lives have
to lost before we will do some thing? If we say nothing and turn the other
way, we're just as guilty as those that committed the crime.
Aliza Blumenfeld
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retracts Support for Weinberg
To the Editors:
Several weeks ago I wrote a letter in defense of Rav
Matis Weinberg. Since then, new evidence has been presented to me and
I must, regretfully, withdraw my letter and my support. Although I
wrote the letter with the sincere hope to help clear Rav Matis's name and
I offered my professional opinion in his favor, I have recently learned more
details to compel me to reconsider. At worst, I fault him - at best,
I suspect him. I believe that printing my previous letter will be
misleading to your readership, might offer credibility to a man who does
not deserve it and further confuse people who desperately want to believe
in the man.
Lynn Gimpel, Ph.D.
Emory 1971
Editors' Note: Dr. Gimpel's original letter was published
on the website, but not in the print edition, before we received this
retraction.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information on The Awareness Center
To the Editors:
The Awareness Center strongly supports The YU Commentator
for breaking the story regarding Rabbi Matis Weinberg. It took a lot
of courage to let this story (that was 20 years in the making) come out of
the closet. But there was a mistake in the note written by the YU
Commentator's editor, [which characterized The Awareness Center as "an
organization dedicated to protecting the Jewish Community from sex offenders
in leadership positions"(Letters, Volume 67, Issue 11) ]. The Awareness Center
is an international organization dedicated to addressing SEXUAL ABUSE in
Jewish Communities around the world. We offer resources and information
on all sorts of topics that relate to educating the Jewish community on the
ramifications sexual abuse can have on individuals, families, friends, and
our society. This includes information on and about sex offenders.
Vicki Polin, MA, ATR, LCPC
Executive Director - The Awareness Center
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Defends Weinberg From Hawaii
To the Editors:
I have known Rabbi Matis Weinberg for about 16
years. I became a Baal Tshuvah in `86 at the age of 37. When
I found the Truth, I dove into it completely and spent the next 5 years mostly
in Jerusalem, attending many Yeshivot and becoming friends with many very
learned rabbis. While not in Yeshiva, the place I spent the most time
was at was Rabbi Matis Weinberg's house. I became very good friends
with him, his wife and children. Rav Matis is, by far, the most intelligent
and well rounded rabbi I have ever met. One of the things that bothered
me back then was the innuendos from a couple of other rabbis. I could
see that it was their jealousy and insecurity that would make them say things
like that.
I left Israel in August `91 and there are only 3 rabbis
I have kept in contact with. He is one, not only because I am so impressed
with his vast knowledge of many subjects and the way he brings them into
living a Kosher, Jewish life, he is also one of the most sensitive and caring
people I have ever met. I now live in Hawaii, which has almost zero
Jewish life. Although it is difficult, I live a kosher life and without
his friendship and guidance, I would not be at the level I am at.
If the small-minded, jealous people that have accused
him can prove their points, please do it, otherwise they can go back under
the rocks they came from and let the rest of us bask in the illumination
of his brilliance. Let him go back to his writing and teaching instead
of being stressed by insecure, jealous, loshon hora mongers.
Dr. Rand Pellegrino
Kailua, HI
Machon Shlomo `90
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shameful Reporting Exposed
To the Editors:
With the release of the Jewish Week's article about
the investigation into the allegations against Matis Weinberg, I feel the
issue has finally been brought out clearly into the public forum. In light
of the responsible and informative article published by Gary Rosenblatt,
the egregious errors, in both content and presentation, conveyed in the
Commentator's treatment of the same topic appear all the more vicious and
negligent. Perhaps it is not fair to compare our college rag with a professional
weekly paper, but when the distortions in the Commentator have created so
much pain, embarrassment and distortion of the facts, it is clear that the
concept of fairness has already been dispensed with.
I spent last year learning at Derech Etz Chaim and
I will unashamedly proclaim that it was one of the best years of my life.
The Torah I learned, the friends I made and the growth I experienced there
will stay with me forever. Upon returning from my studies, I was proud to
tell people about where I had learned and was ready to enthusiastically sing
the praises of the yeshivah. And while I was not personally close to Matis
Weinberg, I definitely enjoyed his lectures and his writing. What makes the
case against him so sad, is how brilliant and charismatic he is, and how
difficult it is to resolve that such deep teaching could come from someone
about whom such terrible things are now being said.
The way that Y.U.'s dissociation from Derech Etz Chaim
was portrayed in the Commentator is the definition of irresponsible journalism.
The articles underlying implications that D.E.C. was a cult and that we were
all being manipulated my Matis Weinberg was disgusting, and showed utter
disregard for the responsibility placed upon a journalist to report the facts
honestly and evenhandedly. The one weekly shiur that he gave at Derech Etz
Chaim was a community-wide event attended by many people completely unconnected
to the yeshivah, and which many students at the yeshivah did not attend
(including me, occasionally). If anyone is interested in the truth, they
should read the Jewish Week, which accurately reports that Matis Weinberg
was loosely affiliated with Derech Etz Chaim (which is no longer the case)
and that he has been a rebbe to several of the rabbis there. We accorded
him respect because of the Torah he taught us, in the same manner as friends
I have from other yeshivahs who also used to hear him teach.
The provocative tone of the Commentator article, caused
by an unwillingness (or maybe inability) to be clear about the issues, gave
the impression throughout the Y.U. campus that D.E.C. was some sort of homosexual
cult or that the yeshivah existed only as a feeding ground for a sexual predator.
When I tried to dissuade people who asked me questions in the wake of the
article, I could see that my credibility had been damaged and that people
were unsure of how to take what I was telling them, because perhaps I, along
with my fellow alumni, was just a brainwashed cult member assisting in a
cover up. Even worse than that, I found myself doubting the legitimacy of
my own good memories about my experience last year.
Neither of those things would have happened had the
Commentator approached the issue in the manner of the Jewish Week, which
notes YU's reservations about being connected to DEC without blowing anything
out of proportion, and fearlessly addresses the issues which are actually
important, like the case against the "rabbi in question". The approach of
the Commentator was hurtful, inaccurate, and immature. Instead of bringing
a serious problem to light, it poured salt in the wounds of those who were
already in pain.
Aaron J. Roller
Y.C. `05
Editors Respond:
Our story, centering on Yeshiva's severing of ties
from DEC, covered the relevant angles from the perspective of Yeshiva students.
Yeshiva's disassociation from a successful feeder school, and the administrative
process that finalized it, required frontal coverage. It was not relevant
to our audience that we report fully the allegations against Rabbi Weinberg,
which is why, respectful of the bounds of loshon hora, we did not. Similarly,
it was not relevant to the Jewish Week's audience that they discuss fully
Yeshiva's relationship with DEC, which is why they did not.
Both our initial article and the subsequent letters
section mentioned points that Mr. Roller raises. For example, we mentioned
that "Rabbi Katz also denies the extent of the said rabbi's influence and
involvement. `On Thursday evenings we host a public shiur which enjoys the
attendance of over 100 people including community members and most DEC students,'
he said, in reference to the rabbi's weekly class." We also printed 9 critical
letters in the last issue, some of which were indeed submitted by DEC students.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change of Heart
To the Editors:
Great coverage of Derech Etz Chaim (Volume 67, Issues
9 and 11, 3/6/03 and 4/10/03). You presented this properly and using the
DEC website reference was wonderful. Thank you for balanced reporting. You
are to be commended.
Barry Faigen
Pittsburgh PA
Editors' Note: Mr. Faigen's original letter, which
was published in Issue 11, accused The Commentator of "yellow journalism"
and "typical of `indictment on the front page with vindication hidden later
on the back page.'"
By Stephanie Saul - Staff Writer
Newsday - May 26, 2003, 8:10 PM EDT
This is the first in a three-part series.
It was the sound of ripping cloth, they said, that
woke them up.
On an August night in the Catskills, with summer camp
almost over, the boys had fallen asleep in their bunkhouse, exhausted from
play and religious study. Only minutes later, they would later testify in
court, the noise awakened them. Then came mysterious movements in the dark
cabin. The campers lay still. Why was a human figure hovering over the bed
of a 10-year-old Woodmere boy?
The terrified boy blurted out his allegation to a camp counselor
almost a day later: Someone, he said, had torn open the seat of his pajamas
and sexually abused him.
The boy's parents were called to camp more than a day
later, but police were not notified.
"We all concurred that considering the trauma that
would possibly result from further action, it would be best not to take any
additional action," according to the camp's notes, later filed in court in
a civil suit. A state Department of Health sanitarian later found that the
camp violated state regulations by not reporting the accusation.
Police learned of the allegations two months later,
alerted by a psychologist who was treating the boy. The boy's mother later
told a state official she felt pressured to remain silent, according to state
health department records. After all, the alleged abuser and the camp officials
were revered religious leaders.
The accused was eventually acquitted by a judge, who
said "contradictory and sometimes retracting statements" left him unclear
about what happened. The camp suggests that the alleged incident was
fabricated.
After more than a year of charges and disclosures
concerning sexual abuse of young people by Catholic priests, the story may
sound familiar. But the camp, Mogen Avraham, is a popular summer retreat
in Bethel for Orthodox Jewish children. And the accused was not a priest,
but a teaching rabbi from Forest Hills.
The alleged 1998 incident at Camp Mogen Avraham is
just one in a growing dossier of allegations that rabbis, cantors and other
Jewish religious leaders have abused children and teenagers in their care,
a Newsday investigation has found.
In sheer numbers, the problem is unlikely to rival
the Catholic Church's, since priests outnumber rabbis by roughly nine to
one. While there is no data on the number of clergy with sexual disorders,
experts say that, anecdotally, the problem does not seem as severe in the
rabbinate as in the priesthood, even in relative terms.
Even so, some rabbis call the sexual abuse allegations
a "crisis," and religious organizations are grappling with ways to handle
it.
"We have a huge problem on our hands, a problem that
is just beginning to be addressed in religious circles," Vicki Polin, a
psychotherapist, said in recent testimony to the Maryland legislature.
Polin, who is Jewish and calls herself a survivor of
childhood sexual abuse, runs The Awareness Center, a Baltimore-based
clearinghouse that tracks sexual abuse allegations against Jewish religious
leaders. The center's Web site lists about 40 alleged cases of abuse involving
rabbis and cantors. As with the Catholic scandals, Jewish victims say they
still struggle years, even decades, later with this betrayal of trust.
"I can honestly say that he ruined not only my Bas-Mitzvah,
but my faith in Judaism," wrote one woman, now 30, referring to Rabbi Sidney
Goldenberg. In a letter to California prosecutors, the woman said Goldenberg,
then a cantor, made lewd comments and rubbed her thigh in her parents' home
in Seaford in 1985. At the time, he was supposed to be helping her prepare
for her bat mitzvah, the joyous and solemn religious celebration when a Jewish
girl turns 13.
Goldenberg was convicted in 1997 of abusing a 12-year-old
California bat mitzvah student, after investigators uncovered a 27-year trail
of complaints by girls against him. He served three years and is now living
on Coney Island, according to police.
Like the Goldenberg case, the abuse allegations tend
to have common elements, including some familiar from the Catholic
scandals:
Children and in some cases parents are reluctant to
accuse respected clergymen. When they do, they are often disbelieved, dismissed,
even derided.
"You have to understand the extent to which the guys
in the school looked up to [the rabbi]," says one man, now 38, who says he
was abused as a teenager by a rabbi now teaching in Israel. "He was beyond
question."
And another rabbi recalls dismissing several girls'
complaints against Goldenberg as "some giggly thing."
Religious authorities fail to report abuse charges
to the police. Among strictly observant Orthodox Jews, this tendency is bolstered
by the ancient doctrine of mesira, which prohibits Jews from informing on
other Jews to secular authorities, a legacy of centuries of oppression of
Jews in many countries.
When religious leaders try to investigate cases and
prevent abusers from having contact with children, their efforts often fail.
"Few rabbis have any training in recognizing abuse, and the rabbinical courts
have no investigative arm," says Rabbi Yosef Blau, the spiritual counselor
to students at Yeshiva University.
Alleged abusers continue to operate freely by moving
among congregations, states, even countries. Avrohom Mondrowitz, a self-styled
rabbi who once had a popular radio show in Brooklyn, is living openly and
teaching in a Jerusalem college although he is wanted on charges of sexually
abusing four Brooklyn boys, aged 10 to 16. If he ever returns to the United
States, he will be arrested, according to the office of Brooklyn District
Attorney Charles J. Hynes.
Many of the alleged abusers were popular, even charismatic
leaders, who were thought to be particularly good in relating to young people.
Rabbi Baruch Lanner, convicted last year of endangering the welfare of two
girls at a New Jersey yeshiva, sidestepped abuse allegations for years, in
part because of his reputation as a dynamic figure in an Orthodox youth
program.
Unlike the Catholic Church, Jewish authority is not
centralized, but various groups within the branches of Judaism have begun
to strengthen anti-abuse policies for their members.
At its annual meeting, which starts today in Rye, the
Rabbinical Council of America, an organization of 1,100 Orthodox rabbis,
features programs on curbing abuse, including one entitled "Rabbinic Behavior:
Confronting a Crisis of Accountability."
"We're trying to establish that inappropriate behavior
is inexcusable," said Rabbi Hershel Billet, president of the organization
and rabbi at Young Israel of Woodmere.
Rabbi Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, a psychotherapist who is
also the Orthodox Union's executive vice president, said he hopes the rabbinical
council will make a firm commitment during the meeting "to develop a real,
real tight program" combating sexual abuse.
The rabbinical council is expected to discuss ways
to adjudicate abuse allegations against its members, with penalties that
include ouster.
Sources within the organization say that the impetus
for the panel's work includes old abuse allegations against Rabbi Ephraim
Bryks of Kew Gardens Hills, which he has repeatedly denied, and the recent
arrest of Rabbi Israel Kestenbaum of Highland Park, N.J.
Kestenbaum, a chaplaincy leader for the New York Board
of Rabbis, was charged in February with endangering the welfare of a minor
after allegedly discussing sex with an undercover police officer posing as
a teenage girl in a chat room called "I Love Older Men." Kestenbaum has pleaded
not guilty.
Rabbis concerned about sex abuse say accusations against
a rabbi are often handled quietly, or not at all. Accused rabbis go on hiatus
briefly, then revive their ministries in other congregations, even other
countries in the far-flung Diaspora.
One of those was Rabbi Matis Weinberg. Accused of sexually
abusing students at his California yeshiva two decades ago, he is said to
have agreed to leave teaching. But Weinberg resurrected his teaching career
in Israel. When Yeshiva University in Manhattan recently unearthed the
allegations against Weinberg, the New York school severed its ties to the
Jerusalem college where Weinberg had lectured until recently.
Weinberg has never been charged with a crime and has
denied the former students' allegations. Through a friend, he declined to
discuss the charges with Newsday.
The allegations against Weinberg have been widely reported
in the Jewish press and have helped bring the issue to the fore in recent
months.
Like the Orthodox rabbis' council, representatives
of other branches of Judaism say they are taking steps to combat sexual
abuse.
"I would rather this not become an epidemic and I think
what we need to do is take affirmative steps to guide people before they
make mistakes," said Rabbi Jerome Epstein of the United Synagogue of Conservative
Judaism, the lay arm of the Conservative movement. Epstein said the group's
committee on congregational standards is currently working on a "best practices"
document.
Rabbi Steven Rosenberg of McAllen, Texas, formerly
the leader of the Jewish Center of Bay Shore, said his Conservative congregation
already has adopted such rules.
"If I have a bat mitzvah in my office, the door is
never closed," said Rosenberg, who also tells his 23 religion school teachers
"they are not allowed to touch students, not a pat, not a hug."
"It is very important for me for my congregants to
know: That kind of behavior -- we will not tolerate it," said Rosenberg.
Rosenberg was sensitized by the case against Sidney
Goldenberg, the former cantor, who had worked at the Bay Shore synagogue
before moving to California.
Many rabbis say their groups would always notify police
about abuse although their rules usually do not spell this out. Such notification
was one of the remedies embraced by Roman Catholic bishops in the priest
abuse scandal. And Reform rabbis are in the process of revising their ethics
code to include such a requirement, according to Rabbi Paul Menitoff, executive
vice president of the Central Conference of American Rabbis.
The National Conference of Synagogue Youth, an Orthodox
group, does have a policy requiring that police be notified, an outgrowth
of its scandal involving Lanner, a longtime youth leader with the group.
In that case, a religious court called a bet din concluded
in 1989 that the most serious charges against Lanner were unfounded, clearing
the way for his continued youth work. Last year, more than a dozen years
later, he was convicted in New Jersey on abuse-related charges.
Orthodox Jews frequently rely on the batei din, but
Blau, a member of the Lanner bet din, has become an outspoken critic of the
religious court system.
For one thing, he said, judges in the religious courts
often know the accused, making fair decisions difficult. In addition, he
said that perjury before a bet din is rarely punished.
Appearing in February before dozens of students in
the main study hall at Yeshiva University, Blau and the two other members
of the Lanner bet din issued an extraordinary public apology for their role
in allowing Lanner to continue unchecked for so many years.
"We must do everything in our power to protect potential
victims from abuse," the apology said. "This includes reporting accusations
of abuse to Jewish and, at times, to secular authorities."
Such a secular-reporting requirement is controversial
among some Orthodox groups, partly because it appears to run counter to the
doctrine called mesira.
In ancient times, one who violated the doctrine and
reported a fellow Jew to secular authorities could be killed on sight. Today,
the punishment is generally ostracism in the community.
The vast majority of rabbis agree that mesira is overridden
when there is imminent danger to possible future victims, but Blau says the
taboo remains, particularly among the most traditional Orthodox.
Civil authorities who seek to act against rabbinic
abuse often become frustrated by the reluctance of witnesses to testify.
Prosecutors in Sullivan County complained during the
case that their witnesses faced pressure when they tried to prosecute Yaakov
Weiner, the teaching rabbi acquitted in the Mogen Avraham case.
"It was a bitter pill for me," remembers Tom Cawley,
the former Sullivan County assistant district attorney who prosecuted the
Mogen Avraham case. "They sent their kid to camp up here in Bethel and thought
he'd be taken care of. Someone was taken care of, all right, but it wasn't
him."
Weiner, who has taught in several yeshivas throughout
the metropolitan area, consistently denied the charges. Attempts to reach
him through one of his lawyers were unsuccessful.
The boy's mother and father, a rabbi himself, would
not discuss the case with Newsday. But camp and State Health Department records
filed in court indicate that the parents were not told of the alleged abuse
until nearly 48 hours after the boy spoke of it, while the 36-year-old Weiner's
father, a rabbi well-known in the Queens Orthodox community, was notified
sooner.
Contacted recently, the camp's current executive director,
Moshe Wein, defended the camp's handling of the accusation, saying, "There's
no evidence to indicate that an incident took place." He added, "This may
be one of those cases in which a child lied."
Lawyers for Weiner at his bench trial made much of
contradictions in the boy's statements. But the most confusing testimony
came from the alleged victim's bunkmates.
One of the boys reversed his story between the time
he spoke to police and the trial several months later, Cawley said in
court.
"We believe that there was pressure placed on the victim
and children's families to get them not to testify," said Sullivan County
District Attorney Stephen Lungen in a recent telephone interview. "There
was a child who could have substantiated what was said, and that family would
not cooperate."
The entire matter left Sullivan County Judge Frank
Labuda confused.
"It is clear in the evening hours of August 8 and the
morning of August 9, two years ago, something happened at bunk 3 Gimel bunk...
" he said in his January 2000 ruling. But Labuda concluded that trial testimony
"does not create a clear picture for this court of exactly what happened
in Gimel bunk nor who did it."
He found Weiner not guilty.
By Stephanie Saul - Staff Writer
Newsday - May 27, 2003, 4:37 PM EDT
Second of three parts.
Alumni of a California yeshiva held a reunion, of sorts,
in Brooklyn recently, but it wasn't to reminisce about the school's idyllic
setting, lakeside lessons or frequent class trips.
Instead, a handful of former students aired claims
against the now-closed school's former rabbi, Matis Weinberg. The charismatic
Weinberg had enthralled and entertained them with his brilliant lectures,
the former students recalled, but, they alleged, he also had shocked and
confused them with sexual attacks.
One former student at all-male Kerem Yeshiva says he
first believed Weinberg's fondling was the rabbi's attempt to make sure he
was properly circumcised.
Later, the former student consulted Maimonides and
other Jewish philosophers for guidance but found nothing that applied. He
said he became troubled and introspective, taking long walks in the Judean
desert, where he had moved.
"I just used to take walks for hours, go hiking by
myself. Just trying to figure out what this all was," said the man.
It has been nearly 20 years since Kerem was quietly
closed while rumors circulated that something untoward had occurred there.
But the allegations against Weinberg, hushed up two decades ago when he is
said to have quietly agreed to leave Jewish education, recently resurfaced.
A remark at a Brooklyn dinner touched off an investigation by Yeshiva University
in Manhattan, which led the college to sever ties with a Jerusalem school
where Weinberg was lecturing.
Weinberg, 56, has never been charged with a crime and
has denied the allegations. In an interview with The Jewish Week, a Manhattan
newspaper, Weinberg acknowledged that he was physically demonstrative with
his students, but he said it was never in a sexual way. Through a friend,
he declined to speak with Newsday.
Several former students interviewed by Newsday said
they had never reported him to police. Within their strictly Orthodox community,
doing so would have violated protocols against reporting a fellow Jew to
secular authorities and shaming the community. At their May 1 meeting in
Brooklyn, the former students said, a group of rabbis reviewed their allegations.
The former students said the charges would be referred to a religious tribunal
in Israel, where Weinberg lives. Former students paint a strange picture
of Weinberg's conduct, both at Kerem, the yeshiva of about 80 students he
founded in Santa Clara, Calif., and, later, in Israel, where he relocated
in about 1982. Their descriptions cast light on how a religious leader could
retain the loyalty of followers despite conduct they say they found deeply
troubling.
"You have to understand the extent to which the guys
in the school looked up to Rabbi Weinberg. He was beyond question," said
one former student. "He would constantly laud himself and his school as the
only true way of Torah, the only true representation of true Torah values
and learning. He would criticize other schools as too old-fashioned and too
European, closed-minded."
The former student, now 38, said Weinberg had an inner
circle of favorite students, with whom he displayed a relationship many came
to view as eccentric.
"He would walk around campus holding hands with these
guys and ... regularly kiss them on the neck, cheek, nibble on guys' ears
in a way that a lover would," said the former student.
Sexual references were included in nearly every lecture,
the student said. "He always found a way to get on that subject no matter
what he was teaching," said the man. "He would do it in the guise of teaching
Torah, but he was obsessed."
The student also said that he twice saw Weinberg harshly
punish students for smoking, hitting one student, who wore braces, in the
face until his mouth bled and grinding a lighted cigarette into the hand
of another.
The former student said he was in his senior year at
Kerem, getting dressed in his dorm room, when Weinberg first abused him.
"He came into the room, gave me a hug, and while he
was doing that he put his hand in my robe and started fondling me. All the
time, he was making these gutteral type noises. I was freaked out. I just
didn't know what to do."
But the man, who said he was then 17 or 18, decided
to remain at Kerem. "I felt that he or the school had something very unique
to teach, but that I would keep my distance from him personally because I
was not interested in this happening again." The man was one of about 40
students who followed the rabbi to Israel in 1982. But after Weinberg groped
him two more times, the man said, he completely lost faith in his rabbi.
"In a society in which to continue one's Torah study,
one is expected to get close to a rabbi and continue learning, I pretty much
didn't do that," said the man. He has remained in Israel and is
unmarried.
"I just find it difficult to trust people," he
said.
In about 1990, after several years of despondency,
the young man said, he confronted Weinberg.
"In the end, he was just like a shoplifter you catch
stealing clothes. He didn't have an excuse," said the man.
Another man, now living on the West Coast, related
a similar story. He said that Weinberg called him into a dormitory room at
Kerem, pulled him onto a bed under the pretense of telling him something,
then began to pull off his shirt, massage his chest, unbutton his pants and
fondle him.
The man, then 14, says he bolted from the room and
later told his parents, who seemed to brush off the complaint.
But more than 20 years later, complaints against the
rabbi came to light, sparked by remarks at a Sabbath dinner in February at
the home of a Brooklyn pediatrician.
According to sources knowledgeable about the dinner,
a young man was asked to give a talk based on a passage from Leviticus about
leaving fields fallow every seven years.
The student included a seemingly inappropriate sexual
reference and attributed it to Weinberg, who at the time lectured at Derech
Etz Chaim, a school in Jerusalem.The comment raised a red flag for the
pediatrician, an expert on sexual abuse of children. The doctor contacted
Yeshiva University, which included Derech Etz Chaim in a program for Yeshiva
students studying in Israel.
The Manhattan school moved quickly, contacting Weinberg's
former students around the world. In February, Yeshiva notified students
that Derech Etz Chaim was no longer affiliated with Yeshiva. The letters
blamed the school's "educational and learning environment," but a Yeshiva
official confirmed that Weinberg was the cause for concern.
"An investigation by others and information brought
directly to my attention makes it clear that the scandal 20 years ago was
a very real one," said Rabbi Yosef Blau, the spiritual counselor to Yeshiva
University students.
Blau said that two decades ago, at the urging of several
rabbis who had learned of abuse allegations, Weinberg agreed to leave Jewish
education.
Yeshiva officials have said that Weinberg was an important
influence in Derech Etz Chaim. But Ken Lapatine, a Manhattan lawyer for the
Jerusalem school, said he had lectured there only once a week and was not
paid.
"The moment the school [Derech Etz Chaim] learned of
the allegation," Lapatine said, "it terminated the relationship."
By Joe Berkofsky
JTA - June 4, 2003
NEW YORK, June 4 (JTA) — An Israeli religious
school has slapped Yeshiva University with a lawsuit in a contract dispute
sparked by charges that a rabbi at the Israeli school sexually molested
students.
On Monday, the Derech Etz Chaim yeshiva of Jerusalem
filed a breach of contract lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York, alleging that Y.U. financially "crippled" the school
by severing ties following allegations that a lecturer made unwanted sexual
advances toward students.
The Jerusalem school is seeking a minimum of $75,000
in damages and is asking Judge William Pauley to issue an injunction preventing
Yeshiva from making further "disparaging" comments about it, including
allegations that the school tried to cover up the controversy.
Y.U. officials did not reply to repeated requests for
comment.
The charges come a few weeks into the tenure of Richard
Joel as president of Yeshiva University, the flagship institution of modern
Orthodoxy.
They also mark the latest sexual misconduct scandal
to rock the Orthodox community in several years.
In December 2000, a special commission that Joel chaired
found that a leading Orthodox youth group figure had sexually and physically
abused teens.
The lawsuit against Yeshiva arises out of a conflict
that surfaced in February, when the university said 10 sophomores who studied
at Etz Chaim during their freshman year failed to attend some classes upon
their return, instead studying with the Etz Chaim rabbi via e-mail.
Yeshiva then halted its year-abroad program, charging
the students maintained an untoward "allegiance" to an unnamed rabbi associated
with Etz Chaim.
According to press reports, the controversial figure
is Rabbi Matis Weinberg, a charismatic, Baltimore-born Torah scholar who
allegedly sexually harassed students amid what the university's newspaper
called a "cult-like" environment at Etz Chaim.
Neither Yeshiva nor Etz Chaim have confirmed or denied
the sexual misconduct charges, and no one has brought legal action against
Weinberg.
However, a New York religious court, or Beit Din, heard
complaints from current and former students and referred them to an Israeli
religious court in May.
Etz Chaim officials said they learned of the sexual
harassment charges from Yeshiva.
The school "was not aware of any allegations of sexual
misconduct against Rabbi Weinberg until Yeshiva University started making
those allegations public," said Sarah Wadelton, an attorney with the New
York firm Greenberg Traurig, which represents Derech Etz Chaim.
Once the charges surfaced, the school canceled Weinberg's
weekly lecture series to ensure that its commitment to "student safety was
beyond question," Wadelton said.
"Without accepting those allegations as true, they
wanted to be as proactive as possible," she said.
Rabbi Aharon Katz, the school's principal, added that
Weinberg was not a member of Etz Chaim's faculty, but was an unpaid guest
lecturer who delivered popular weekly talks open to the general public.
Weinberg could not be reached for comment but has denied
the charges. He voluntarily resigned once the charges surfaced, Katz
said.
Katz would not comment on the veracity of the sexual
impropriety charges, but said the notion that Y.U. students were skipping
classes to study with Weinberg after their return to New York was "patently
untrue."
Katz said about two dozen of the school's 45 students
hailed from Yeshiva University. Y.U. officials would not provide him with
a list of those said to be skipping class, Katz said.
Katz also portrayed Etz Chaim, located in Jerusalem's
heavily Orthodox Har Nof neighborhood, as a highly accessible place where
students' parents often visited classes or spent Shabbat, and where open
lectures such as Weinberg's drew people from around the country.
"When people say it's a `cult-like environment,' it
sounds like a closed environment. This is anything but," he said.
In the wake of Y.U.'s move to sever ties, Etz Chaim
officials say enrollment has dropped and the school is in danger of
closing.
This spring, several students decided not to return
after the Passover break and some parents took their sons out of school,
while registrations for the coming year have thinned, Wadelton and Katz
said.
They could not say exactly how much money the school
has lost, or how far enrollment has fallen.
"There have been very serious damages to the school
in response to Yeshiva University's public campaign of disparagement," Wadelton
said.
Besides damages, the school wants the court to prevent
Yeshiva from saying the school is "cult-like," that it failed to act in response
to the charges and that officials "concealed" the growing sex scandal, Wadelton
said.
Etz Chaim officials said they tried to resolve the
dispute "amicably" through phone calls and intermediaries, but that Yeshiva
was unresponsive.
Katz said he always had been pleased with the "top-notch"
high school graduates who took part in Y.U.'s program at Etz Chaim.
"We valued our relationship with Y.U. We found it to
be a good partner, and it's a partner we would like to continue to work with
in the future," he said.
by Gary Rosenblatt
The Jewish Week - July 11, 2003
A religious court in Jerusalem has taken up the case
of sex abuse charges leveled at Rabbi Matis Weinberg, the noted Torah scholar,
author and lecturer accused of making advances toward former yeshiva students,
The Jewish Week has learned.
The bet din is affiliated with the Badatz Eida Haredi,
a well-known religious court in the fervently Orthodox sector of the
community.
The bet din's decision to take the case was based on
hearings conducted in New York in early May by Rabbis Shmuel Kaminetsky of
Philadelphia, Feivel Cohen of Brooklyn and Moshe Hauer of Baltimore, prompted
by a report in The Jewish Week. The report included allegations against Rabbi
Weinberg made by former students, some from earlier this year and others
going back more than 20 years. Rabbi Weinberg denies all the charges.
Several of the former students appeared before the
three American rabbis to offer testimony. The American bet din provided the
Israeli court with transcripts from the May proceedings.
Several alleged victims in Israel say they will seek
permission from the bet din there to press civil and criminal charges against
Rabbi Weinberg, in addition to a finding that would publicly attest to the
rabbi's guilt. Rabbi Weinberg is the scion of a prominent Baltimore rabbinic
family and has published a number of highly praised volumes of Torah
study.
By ELLI WOHLGELERNTER - FORWARD CORRESPONDENT
FORWARD - AUGUST 22, 2003
Note: A correction to the following story was
run in the October 3rd issue of the Forward. That correction appears at the
bottom of this page, below the original story.
JERUSALEM — A charismatic, American-born rabbi
and educator accused of sexually molesting his yeshiva students over a 25-year
period failed to appear at a rabbinical court hearing convened to consider
the accusations last week.
The no-show by the educator, Rabbi Matis Weinberg,
prompted expressions of outrage from several of his alleged victims, who
called it the latest in a long series of steps by Weinberg to avoid an inquiry
into his conduct. One accuser said he was close to a decision to bring the
case to the secular authorities.
But the head of the rabbinical tribunal, Rabbi Moshe
Shternbuch, said he was unperturbed by Weinberg's failure to appear, and
voiced confidence that Weinberg would cooperate after he returned from a
visit to the United States. "A person can go to America when he wants,"
Shternbuch said. "Why should we be surprised? I hear he goes every
year."
The case against Weinberg comes at a time of acute
sensitivity within the Orthodox community over accusations of rabbis abusing
minors — and in some cases enjoying the protection of a wall of silence
put up by other Orthodox rabbis and Orthodox institutions.
One rabbi, Baruch Lanner, formerly a regional director
of the National Conference of Synagogue Youth, was sentenced last year in
New Jersey to seven years in prison for abusing two teenage girls while serving
as a yeshiva principal. He is currently free on appeal. A special commission
appointed by the Orthodox Union, which sponsors the youth group, had concluded
in a December 2000 report that Lanner had been abusing both girls and boys
over two decades and that other union officials had known of the suspicions
and covered them up.
Another rabbi, Israel Kestenbaum, pleaded guilty last
week in a New York state court to attempting to disseminate indecent material
to a minor and attempting to endanger the welfare of a child. Kestenbaum
admitted that he sought sex with an e-mail pal named "Katie" in an Internet
chat room called "I Love Older Men," who he believed was a 13-year-old girl
but turned out to be an NYPD detective. In a plea bargain, he was sentenced
to five years' probation and treatment in a sex offenders' program.
Some Orthodox Jews say the cases are part of a pattern
of abuse and cover-up. One Web site — www.theawarenesscenter.org —
lists 42 cases of rabbis and cantors accused of abuse, and another 40 involving
other trusted officials, including parents, teachers, camp counselors and
others.
Responding to public anger, the main rabbinical body
associated with the Orthodox Union, the Rabbinical Council of America, adopted
a resolution at its convention this past spring saying the organization is
"committed to reporting acts or suspicions of child abuse as required by
civil law." The conference ordered a review of its own procedures for dealing
with accusations of abuse, with a June 2004 deadline for developing new
rules.
Weinberg, 56, a charismatic, Baltimore-born teacher,
author and lecturer, is a member of a rabbinical family of near-legendary
renown in Israel and the United States, descended from the Slonimer chasidic
dynasty. Weinberg's father Yaakov Weinberg was a dean of the respected Ner
Israel Yeshiva in Baltimore, and his uncle, Noach Weinberg, founded Aish
HaTorah, a Jerusalem yeshiva and outreach organization with affiliates around
the world.
The case against Weinberg dates back to the 1970s,
when he was in his 20s and teaching at a school he founded in Santa Clara,
Calif., the Kerem Yeshiva. Several former students have told similar stories
of Weinberg engaging in elaborate demonstrations of physical affection, at
times crossing over into seeming sexual overtures.
The California accusers began to come forward earlier
this year, after similar accusations against Weinberg surfaced in Jerusalem,
prompting the New York-based Yeshiva University to sever ties with a Jerusalem
school where Weinberg was teaching. The Jerusalem school, Derech Etz Chaim,
a post-high school boys' academy, was founded five years ago by Weinberg's
former students.
Yeshiva University said it was terminating its association
with the Jerusalem school because of "compelling evidence" of a history of
alleged sexual abuse by Weinberg and cultlike behavior toward his students.
The university made its findings known in a letter sent to parents of current
Derech Etz Chaim students, following an international investigation in which
the university concluded that maintaining its association with the Jerusalem
academy would be "betraying the trust between Yeshiva University and its
students."
Weinberg immediately stopped teaching his once-weekly
class at Derech Etz Chaim. The school has since filed a breach of contract
lawsuit against Yeshiva University in U.S. District Court in New York, alleging
that the university financially crippled the school by severing its
ties.
But the university's action opened the floodgates.
Former students, knowing an Orthodox institution knew what they had experienced,
were emboldened to come forward. Speaking to journalists, students described
Weinberg over the years kissing their cheeks and necks "making these noises
that one would make if eating something delicious or making love to a woman,"
nibbling on their ears, and "embrac[ing] guys for longer than what would
be considered a friendship hug," according to alleged victims who spoke on
condition of anonymity.
One told how Weinberg had called him into his room
and started unbuttoning his shirt, kissing his chest, unbuttoning his pants
and fondling him. Another told how Weinberg had come into his dorm room and
hugged him, and then put his hand inside his robe and fondled him.
Weinberg has denied any kind of abuse, but has admitted
that he once slapped a boy wearing braces in the mouth so hard that it drew
blood, while the whole student body looked on. He also acknowledged that
he had once extinguished a burnt cigarette in the palm of a student's
hand.
As for his alleged sexual contact with students, Weinberg
maintains that while he was physically demonstrative to his students, often
hugging them, it was never in a sexual way. "I don't get a hard-on" from
such encounters, Weinberg told an interviewer this year.
Some of the alleged victims said they had tried to
report what had happened to other rabbis at the school, but were ignored,
or told it wasn't true. Others said they stayed silent, either because they
were overwhelmed by Weinberg's personality and position, or because they
were ashamed.
The flood of accusations led to the convening in New
York in May of a rabbinical tribunal, comprising Rabbis Shmuel Kaminetsky
of Philadelphia, Feivel Cohen of Brooklyn and Moshe Hauer of Baltimore, who
heard testimony from several students. The rabbis referred the case and provided
transcripts to the rabbinical court of Jerusalem's ultra-Orthodox
community.
The Jerusalem court ordered a hearing on August 14,
summoning Weinberg and two of his accusers to appear. However, the court
learned on the day of the hearing that Weinberg had left for America without
informing them, said the court's head, Shternbuch.
Shternbuch said he would reconvene the panel "immediately,
right away" after Weinberg returned to Israel, which he had been told would
be the end of August.
But one alleged victim who appeared for the court hearing
expressed outrage at the latest delay in the case against Weinberg. "They
are assuming that he's cooperating with them. I feel he's taking advantage
of them," said the alleged victim, who spoke on condition of anonymity. "He's
playing with them. My feeling is that with all the time that's gone by, if
there is no immediate progress, that we will turn to the secular courts.
Our objective is to protect the innocent boys who have anything to do with
Matis, and we are willing to do everything we have to, take any legal means
possible, to achieve that end."
Weinberg's case appears similar in some respects to
Lanner, an admired educator whose success with disaffected youth gave him
a charismatic aura that discouraged accusers. Lanner was said to have abused
both boys and girls over a period of 20 years, but to have escaped punishment
because of the refusal of colleagues and superiors to believe his accusers.
His case was brought to light in a press exposé in June 2000, leading
to a furor among Orthodox Jews.
The resolution by the RCA is the first of its kind
in North America's Modern Orthodox community, and signifies a growing
attentiveness and hypersensitivity to sexual misconduct in the Orthodox community
that until a few years ago would have been unmentionable.
"Events of the past have proven, to our great dismay,
that organizations and individuals have not always dealt with these incidents
in the best possible way," the resolution said. "The Rabbinical Council of
America recommits itself to fulfilling its responsibility for the welfare
of the members of the Jewish community at large and the general community
as well, especially to those who have been victims or who claim to be victims
of an act of sexual, physical or emotional violence, abuse or impropriety."
----------------------------------
Correction:
In our August 22 issue, the Forward published an article
about charges of misconduct against Rabbi Matis Weinberg that were to be
considered at a rabbinical tribunal in Jerusalem. The article reported that
Weinberg failed to appear at an August 14 hearing and referred to him as
"AWOL" and a "no-show." The Forward subsequently has learned that Weinberg
was not summoned to the hearing until August 12, by which time he already
was out of the country, having left earlier for a previously planned trip.
On the day of the hearing, a representative appeared before the tribunal
to explain why Weinberg could not appear on that date.
The Forward also reported, based on an interview with
the head of the tribunal, Rabbi Moshe Shternbuch, that Weinberg was in the
United States at the time. We have subsequently learned that Weinberg was
in Finland.
The Forward did not intend to imply that Weinberg left
Israel after receiving the summons and regrets if any reader took that impression
from the article. We also did not intend to imply that Weinberg's absence
from the hearing had any bearing on his guilt or innocence of the charges
the tribunal was to consider. As our article reported, Shternbuch did not
criticize Weinberg's nonappearance, voicing confidence that Weinberg would
cooperate after he returned to Israel.
Finally, the discussion in the article about other
cases of alleged misconduct by rabbis was meant to put the news report in
the context of other public controversies on the same subject and not to
imply any point of view on Weinberg's guilt or innocence of the charges the
tribunal was to consider.
As the Forward reported in our September 19 issue,
the Jerusalem tribunal has dismissed the case, citing a lack of witnesses
to recent alleged misconduct.
by Elli Wohlgelernter, Forward Correspondent
Forward - SEPTEMBER 19, 2003
JERUSALEM — The rabbinical court that was to hear
testimony from American-born Rabbi Matis Weinberg regarding accusations of
alleged molestation of yeshiva students has dismissed the case because of
a lack of witnesses to recent alleged impropriety.
Rabbi Moshe Shternbuch, head of the three-rabbi beit
din, or rabbinic tribunal, told the Forward that there was only one allegation
relating to the past year and that the panel would not deal with the other
accusations involving incidents alleged to have occurred in the early 1980s.
"They're not going to judge now what happened 20 years ago," he said. "If
there come witnesses in the last year or two, then they'll decide if they
are going to go and call him."
Weinberg, 56, a charismatic, Baltimore-born Torah scholar,
author and lecturer, has been accused of impropriety in his relations with
students in the early 1980s at a yeshiva in California and more recently
at another school in Jerusalem.
Weinberg, who has denied the allegations, declined
to speak to the Forward for this story.
The decision by the Israeli rabbinic court was greeted
with surprise by alleged victims, a rabbi who is advising them and the head
of a rabbinic panel in New York that accepted written and oral testimony
last spring and referred the case to Israel.
"I'm very surprised," said Rabbi Shmuel Kaminetsky,
who headed the panel that met in New York on May 1. "Is there a statute of
limitations? I didn't know there was such a thing in Halacha," he said, using
the Hebrew word for rabbinic canon law.
Kaminetsky said that he had agreed to convene the tribunal
in New York in order to keep the matter within the rabbinic legal system
but that there was nothing more for him to do now. He said he had no advice
for the alleged victims who testified before his tribunal.
"We thought we'd prevent it going to [civil] court,
but if we can't do it, then it's up to them; they have to do whatever they
want to do," he said.
One alleged victim in San Diego said that he and another
complainant were considering whether to take further legal steps.
The alleged victim, who had submitted written testimony
to the Kaminetsky tribunal, exclaimed, "I can't believe it," when told of
the Jerusalem panel's decision. "My question is, why did they decline to
deal with it? What's important is that people are made aware of the
situation."
Rabbi Eliezer Eidlitz, a former rabbi at the California
yeshiva who has been advising the alleged victims, said: "By no means do
I feel that at this point that things have concluded. We'll see where it
goes."
By NACHA CATTAN
Forward - December 12, 2003
Yeshiva University, defending itself against a lawsuit
by an Israeli religious academy with which it severed ties, is countersuing
the Israeli school, alleging that it "utterly refused to protect" Y.U.'s
exchange students from a rabbi affiliated with the academy.
The Israeli school, Derech Etz Chaim yeshiva in Jerusalem,
accused the university in a federal suit filed last spring of "disparagement"
and breach of contract for severing ties based on allegedly false concerns
about the school and the controversial rabbi, Matis Weinberg. The university's
countersuit, filed in the same Manhattan federal court last month, claims
that the Israeli school and its dean had fraudulently "misrepresented" their
connection to Weinberg.
According to Y.U.'s countersuit, the dean of the Israeli
school, Rabbi Aharon Katz, was aware of at least two allegations of sexual
misconduct made against Weinberg. The Y.U. countersuit claims that such
allegations were brought to Katz's attention by a student who attended a
yeshiva run by Weinberg in California more than 20 years ago and more recently
by a student at Derech Etz Chaim. The Israeli school denied the accusations
in a reply filed in court last month.
The university severed ties last February to Derech
Etz Chaim, which had been a participant in the Yeshiva University Israel
Program. The university explained in a letter to parents that the decision
was based on a "review" of the school's "educational standards and learning
environment."
The Jerusalem school charged in its complaint, dated
May 30, that the university had "disparaged" the school by telling callers
who asked about the severing of ties that Weinberg "was creating a 'cult-like
atmosphere' at DEC" and "had been accused of engaging in inappropriate sexual
conduct" with a student. The school said the charges against Weinberg were
false and were "not properly investigated by Y.U."
The suit also alleged that Yeshiva University defamed
Katz by claiming he had prior knowledge of Weinberg's alleged history.
In its countersuit, the university denies making either
claim to the public at the time. However, it says that Y.U. advised callers
that there were allegations of misconduct against Weinberg. The countersuit
claims Y.U. officials discussed the allegations directly with Katz, telling
him that "after a diligent, good-faith investigation, they had concluded
that there were credible allegations that Matis Weinberg had sexually abused
students going back 20 years."
Katz, the countersuit said, "was defensive about Weinberg
and refused to make any commitment to investigate the allegations of abuse"
or to "take any action to safeguard students." Derech Etz Chaim has denied
these allegations as well.
Although Weinberg is not a party to the lawsuit, he
has repeatedly and vehemently denied the allegations of sexual abuse as
baseless.
The Israeli school has filed a reply to the countersuit,
denying Y.U.'s allegations. Both parties are now gathering evidence regarding
their claims.
Weinberg, an American-born educator, held weekly lectures
at Derech Etz Chaim, which the school claims were open to the public and
attended by many people who were not from the yeshiva.
The Derech Etz Chaim civil action alleges that Yeshiva
University financially "crippled" the school by severing ties and passing
along its concerns to other institutions, which also cut off ties, drastically
reducing the academy's enrollment. The school is seeking a minimum of $75,000
in damages and is asking for an injunction to prevent the university from
making further "disparaging" comments about it. Both the suit and the countersuit
are filed under the same case number in the Manhattan federal court.
The university claims in its countersuit that when
one Derech Etz Chaim student complained to Katz of "sexually inappropriate
conduct" by Weinberg, Katz did not investigate the complaint or report it
to governmental authorities, Y.U. or the student's parents.
The attorney representing Katz in New York, Kenneth
Lapatine, said in an interview that the dean, in fact, took action as soon
as the university mentioned its concerns about Weinberg to him. "Rabbi Katz
took appropriate steps to ensure that the student body knew that they would
not have anything to do with Rabbi Weinberg," Lapatine said. "That does not
mean he was accepting the allegations as being true."
Referring to the student who brought his allegations
to Katz, Lapatine said, "By the time that student had come forward, the
relationship had already been severed." However, he said, "Rabbi Katz had
been asked by that student not to disclose" the claim of abuse. Lapatine
also said that the student alleged the abuse took place when he was no longer
studying at Derech Etz Chaim, but was attending Y.U.
"He came to Israel just for a visit," Lapatine said
about the student. "It allegedly occurred when they were traveling
together."
Katz was a former student of Weinberg at Kerem, a yeshiva
in Santa Clara, Calif., founded by Weinberg in the late 1970s. According
to the university's countersuit, "there were allegations that Weinberg's
employment with Kerem was terminated in the 1980s because he allegedly sexually
molested yeshiva students." The countersuit also claims "Rabbi Katz was well
aware of these allegations."
Using the acronym for Derech Etz Chaim, the countersuit
states: "Neither DEC nor Rabbi Katz disclosed that Rabbi Katz has been a
devoted disciple of Weinberg since the 1970s. In fact, Rabbi Katz considers
Weinberg his 'Rebbe,' which means his spiritual guide or mentor. In fact,
Yeshiva University did not know that Rabbi Katz has shaped DEC into a community
advocating Weinberg's 'Hashkafah,' which means his world outlook."
According to the countersuit, students were taught
at the academy that only Weinberg and DEC's philosophy were correct, "that
DEC had the right idea, and that everyone else was wrong." Moreover, the
countersuit states, "Many students returned from DEC and refused to take
part in Yeshiva University's Judaic Studies programs. Instead they engaged
in independent study and consulted with DEC regarding their religious
studies."
Although Weinberg was not formally employed by Derech
Etz Chaim, the university alleges that he had "constant contact" with its
students." DEC conducted class trips to Weinberg's home in Jerusalem, the
university states.
In its suit, the school claims that Weinberg was never
employed or paid by Derech Etz Chaim, that the Jerusalem yeshiva had no prior
knowledge of the accusations against Weinberg and that the statements about
Weinberg are false.
The academy acknowledges that its students were urged
to attend Weinberg's "public" lectures and that Weinberg had an office at
Derech Etz Chaim for two months. But Derech Etz Chaim denies that Weinberg's
relationship to the school was kept hidden.
"Witnesses have been deposed at Y.U. who have testified
that before contracts were renewed they were aware that Rabbi Weinberg was
lecturing at DEC," said Lapatine, the lawyer.
Lapatine added that no one at Derech Etz Chaim discouraged
students from attending classes at Yeshiva University.
By Michael Rosman
The Commentator News - December 28, 2003
In response to a May 2003 lawsuit against Yeshiva brought
by Derech Etz Chaim (DEC), a Jerusalem yeshiva that is part of Yeshiva's
S. Daniel Abraham Israel Program, the University is countersuing DEC, claiming
that DEC and its dean have misrepresented their connection to Rabbi Matis
Weinberg, who allegedly has a history of sexually abusing students.
Last May, DEC filed a breach of contract lawsuit in
a Manhattan federal court, alleging that Yeshiva financially crippled DEC
by severing ties with it, which, DEC officials claimed, was based on false
concerns about the school and the rabbi.
Following a meeting May 12 to discuss the discovery
of evidence that a rabbi integrally associated with the yeshiva had a history
of allegedly sexually abusing and engaging in cult-like behavior with his
students, Yeshiva officials had decided to cut all ties with DEC, a popular
school among students in the Israel Program.
Because Yeshiva stamps its approval on all the schools
affiliated with the Israel Program, it decided that allowing DEC to remain
in the program would be betraying the trust between Yeshiva University and
its students.
"Yeshiva is protecting its interests as well as the
interest of the Yeshiva community," said Jed Marcus, Yeshiva's lead attorney
on the case.
Marcus explained that the decision was based on a close
review of the yeshiva's educational standards and learning atmosphere. "We
established that DEC did not live up to its contract with Yeshiva and did
not accurately identify Rabbi Weinberg as a member of the school's faculty,"
he said.
Marcus further said Yeshiva was not eager to run to
the legal system to handle the situation, but once DEC decided to sue, Yeshiva
felt it had no choice but to respond in kind. "Now that DEC has filed a suit,
Yeshiva who firmly disagrees with DEC's claims will aggressively defend itself
until we win," he said.
DEC charged in its complaint on May 30 that Yeshiva
had defamed DEC by advising callers who asked about Yeshiva's decision that
Rabbi Weinberg was creating a harmful environment at DEC and that he had
been accused of engaging in inappropriate sexual conduct with a student.
DEC said that the charges against Rabbi Weinberg were false and were not
appropriately examined by Yeshiva.
The university's countersuit, filed in November in
the same Manhattan federal court, claims the Israeli school has "utterly
refused to protect" Yeshiva students from Rabbi Weinberg.
The countersuit is based on the claim that the dean
of DEC, Rabbi Aharon Katz, was aware of at least two accusations of sexual
misconduct made against Rabbi Weinberg and chose to ignore them. Yeshiva
claims that these allegations were brought to Rabbi Katz's attention by a
student who attended a yeshiva run by Rabbi Weinberg in California over 20
years ago, and more recently by a student at DEC.
DEC's suit also accused Yeshiva of defaming Rabbi Katz
and DEC by announcing that he had prior knowledge of Weinberg's alleged
background. Kenneth Lapatine, who represents DEC, said Rabbi Katz as well
as DEC "were not aware of any allegations of sexual misconduct against Rabbi
Weinberg until Yeshiva University started making those allegations public."
Mr. Lapatine went on to say that "Whether or not Rabbi Weinberg is indeed
a 'sexual predator,' Yeshiva has no right to make disparaging comments about
DEC, an institution of which Rabbi Weinberg is not even a faculty member."
DEC is asking for $75,000 in damages and has asked the judge to issue an
injunction preventing Yeshiva from further damaging their academy.
In its countersuit, Yeshiva denies making these claims
to the public at the time. The university does admit that they warned callers
of the accusations of misconduct and warned the families of DEC students.
Rabbi Yosef Blau, director of religious guidance at Yeshiva, said, "Yeshiva
notified the families of those students who were attending the school or
had attended DEC in the recent past, to inform them that several students
approached the administration at Yeshiva alleging that Rabbi Weinberg had
sexually abused students while serving as a rabbi at the school."
Yeshiva's countersuit says that Rabbi Katz was defensive
about Rabbi Weinberg and refused to investigate the possibilities of abuse
or take any action to protect students. DEC has denied these
allegations.
Rabbi Katz is a former student of Rabbi Weinberg at
a yeshiva in Santa Clara, CA, called Kerem, founded in the late 1970's. "There
were allegations that Weinberg's employment with Kerem was terminated in
the 1980's because he allegedly sexually molested yeshiva students," according
to the countersuit.
The countersuit also claims that Rabbi Katz was well
aware of these accusations, and neglected to act out of conscientiousness
for his relationship with Rabbi Weinberg. "Neither DEC nor Rabbi Katz disclosed
that Rabbi Katz has been a devoted disciple of Weinberg since the 1970's.
In fact, Rabbi Katz considers Weinberg his 'Rebbe,' which means his spiritual
guide or mentor. In fact, Yeshiva University did not know that Rabbi Katz
has shaped DEC into a community advocating Weinberg's 'Hashkafah,' which
means his world outlook," the countersuit says.
The university says that Rabbi Weinberg had constant
contact with his students and that DEC conducted class trips to Rabbi Weinberg's
home in Jerusalem.
Yeshiva claims that many students, upon returning from
DEC, refused to take part in Yeshiva's Judaic studies programs. Instead they
engaged in independent study and consulted only DEC regarding their religious
pursuits. The countersuit states that students were taught that only Rabbi
Weinberg and DEC's philosophy were correct. Mr. Lapatine denied accusations
against Rabbi Weinberg, and added that no one at DEC discouraged students
from attending Yeshiva University classes.
When asked to comment on the situation, a DEC alumnus
and current YC student said, "I only wish that Yeshiva could put this all
behind them. Every time this resurfaces we are the ones that have to deal
with it. Maybe Yeshiva could think about their students for once."
"Yeshiva wasn't the one who filed the first lawsuit;
students who are upset should go to DEC and complain," said Rabbi Blau.
Many guidance counselors have been hindered from helping
students from DEC, fearing any violation of the suit filed by DEC, asking
the judge to issue an injunction preventing Yeshiva from further damaging
DEC, said Rabbi Blau.
Another DEC alumnus said, "When people ask you what
Yeshiva you went to, you can say Shaalvim, Yeshivat Har Etzion, or KBY and
be proud. I, on the other hand, have to sheepishly answer, 'Derech Etz
Chaim.'"
A third DEC alumnus declined to comment on the specifics
of the case. "It's very difficult when you are stuck in between the college
you attend and a rabbi with whom you are still very close with," he
said.
By Eric J. Adelman
YU Commentator - Feb. 3, 2004
As a former talmid (student) of Derech Etz Chaim (DEC)
and a current talmid of Yeshiva University, I am very disappointed that my
current and former yeshivas seem to be unable to resolve their differences.
Prolonging this situation is extremely hurtful to all involved, including
many DEC alumni. At this point, I think it's important to ask: why does YU
still wish to exclude DEC from the S. Daniel Abraham Israel Program? This
exclusion clearly makes it significantly more difficult for DEC to attract
talmidim, and perhaps this is intended. Why would YU do this?
Granted, there are currently two lawsuits that must
be resolved before any true reconciliation can be contemplated. This
responsibility falls on both DEC and YU. I believe, however, that all parties
agree there is no longer any physical danger whatsoever to DEC's talmidim.
I visited DEC over Succos, and I saw with my own eyes that Rabbi Weinberg
is no longer personally involved, even on a peripheral level, with DEC. The
fact that DEC's hashkafa involves learning at a faster (ok, sometimes a lot
faster) pace than YU does not seem to be reason enough to crush a fine
institution. In fact, DEC encourages its talmidim to maintain their involvement
in the world. Far from being single-minded, DEC alumni at YU are involved
in a plethora of activities, including the Commentator, the Arts Festival,
The SOY Sefarim Sale, YCDS, student government, the chess club, WYUR, the
volleyball team, the break-dancing club and the Writing Center.
The charges of "cult-like activity" seem to be nothing
more than a way to discredit those defending DEC. During my two years at
Derech Etz Chaim, I was always encouraged to examine issues honestly, to
question the status quo and to think outside of the box. Yet for some reason,
YU, which I love dearly, considers me a cult member.
I realize that reconciliation is a two way street,
and that both YU and DEC must be interested in settling their differences.
I call on both sides to do so.
Another point that I have not seen addressed has to
do with DEC alumni at YU failing to attend shiur. I admit that my attendance
last year was less than consistent. (I have since corrected this problem,
somewhat. I am currently in Rabbi Reichman's shiur, which I am enjoying
immensely.) My poor attendance, however, had nothing to do with learning
with my former rabeyim in lieu of shiur or seder, because I never did so.
Rather, I bounced from shiur to shiur, never finding one where I felt that
I could excel. In fact, I even discussed this issue with Rabbi Katz, the
Rosh Yeshiva of DEC, early in the year. He told me that it was imperative
I find a shiur within YU. I know every single DEC alumnus who was in YU at
the time, and none of them were learning with any DEC affiliated Rabeyim
during seder or shiur.
I approached the powers that be at Yeshiva's Mazer
Yeshiva Program to discuss the issue (well before the 'scandal' broke). I
told them what I was looking for in a shiur, and the response was something
along the lines of "that's not how we do things here." I even volunteered
to collect the names of other talmidim who might also be interested in a
faster, more "on the daf" shiur, but the administration remained uninterested.
Such unresponsiveness is the reason why many talmidim (DEC or otherwise)
quickly become jaded with the shiurim at YU. The need for smaller shiurim,
taught by Rabeyim who can relate to their talmidim and who have time to spend
with them, is a topic of frequent conversation. Last semester, one of my
friends compiled a list of over 20 people who would be interested in a faster
shiur. This list included a significant number of talmidim who attended yeshivas
other than DEC. Again, his efforts were for naught, as both MYP and BMP failed
to establish such a shiur. While students who fail to attend shiur are certainly
in the wrong, their behavior is often the result of the administration failing
to meet their needs as talmidim.
I am proud to have gone to Derech Etz Chaim for two
years, and I am proud to attend YU currently. One key YU administrator who
has thus far remained uninvolved in this situation is President Joel. I place
a lot of faith and hope in our new president. I believe that if he were involved,
the situation could be resolved to the satisfaction of all parties involved,
and this pointless parade of lawsuits might come to an end. I call upon him
to look into the matter and guide YU in the right direction.
Letters to the Editor
YU Commentator - Tuesday, February 17, 2004
For several weeks, I have followed the stream of published
letters concerning the DEC litigation but have not commented. I am a musmakh
of RIETS, where I contributed a regular column to Hamevaser for three years.
I also am a graduate of UCLA Law School, former Chief Articles Editor of
UCLA Law Review, and former federal appeals court clerk to the Hon. Danny
J. Boggs in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. Presently,
I am Rav of Young Israel of Calabasas and continue to practice complex civil
litigation. In those last capacities, I am providing pro bono representation
for a witness in the DEC litigation.
When the first allegations broke several years ago
in the New York Jewish Week regarding the scandal centering around a New
Jersey rabbi, some wrote vigorously on Hilkhot Lashon Hara, applied the halakha
to the facts as initially understood, yet ultimately recanted as they learned
more facts. In time, they better understood how complex the halakhic application
was. At first some rushed to defend, and some rushed to condemn. However,
in time, facts sorted themselves out, and a New Jersey state conviction now
is on appeal. As a result, countless future teens, at the height of their
idealism, will not experience what some NCSYers did before the Orthodox Union's
New York office woke up to a brewing rebellion within the ranks.
I understand why DEC has brought its case, and I also
understand why I am providing thousands of dollars in my pro bono legal time
representing a witness who feels compelled by halakha to blow a whistle.
Every one of these types of litigation matters - from those impinging on
the Catholic Church hierarchy to that of Michael Jackson in Neverland, to
the case of the New Jersey rabbi -- begins with the universal recognition
that the alleged tortfeasor never wronged 99.999% of the people with whom
he came into contact. The question is whether one or two or three or half
a dozen incidents occurred over several years -- incidents so heinous that
they fall outside a certain pale.
The right yeshiva in Eretz Yisrael can be critical
for a young person's Torah growth, and the wrong seminary can be a disaster
-- for the child, for the parent. When Yeshiva University lists and endorses
seminaries, it not only provides a service for parents and students, but
it also assumes a serious burden, not less serious than a rabbinic body listing
approved kosher bakeries. If, G-d forbid, Yeshiva gives a haskamah to a seminary
that participates in forging a bond overseas between a student and an authority
figure deleterious to that child's mental, physical, or emotional health,
Yeshiva must remember that its pockets not only are deeper than are those
of the seminary but also are easier to reach in a United States courthouse
if litigation ensues and an adverse judgment rendered.
Yeshiva got caught in a tough vise here. However, if
it had failed to act promptly with moral clarity, its administration could
later have found itself in much the same place that the Orthodox Union's
New York leadership found itself when the New Jersey matter erupted. Much
like Dr. Lynn Gimpel of Emory, who initially wrote The Commentator to criticize
Yeshiva's action but subsequently wrote to reverse that position substantially
after reviewing apparently privileged evidence, I have seen enough documentary
evidence to echo Dr. Gimpel's assessment of the matter's central figure:
"At worst I fault him; at best I suspect him." I would not let my son or
any other person's son go to Neverland for the night, and I would not let
any son respectful of my influence get near the subject of the unproven
allegations in this case matter. The stakes are too high, the risks too great,
the unproven allegations too disturbing, the few testimonies too
unnerving.
Rabbi Dov Fischer
Young Israel of Calabasas
Calabasas, CA
By Gary Rosenblatt - Editor And Publisher
Jewish Week - April 30, 2004
http://thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=9384&print=yes
Contract dispute between two yeshivas centers on
allegations made against Rabbi Matis Weinberg.
On the surface, the suit and counter suit filed by
a small Jerusalem yeshiva, Derech Etz Chaim, and Modern Orthodoxy's flagship
institution, Yeshiva University, are about an alleged breach of
contract.
But underneath, at the simmering center of the case to be heard
in federal court in Manhattan next week, are questions about the behavior
of a charismatic, American-born rabbi, Matis Weinberg, 57, a prominent Torah
scholar and author alleged to have a history of sexual abuse against yeshiva
students.
Rabbi Weinberg's association with Derech Etz Chaim
led Yeshiva University in February 2003 to cut its ties with the 6-year-old
yeshiva, which had been a favorite "feeder" school for YU. Derech Etz Chaim,
which takes about 30 students a year, mostly from the U.S., claimed that
the move by YU dealt it a severe financial blow. It is suing for breach of
contract for at least $75,000, arguing that the allegations are false, and
that Rabbi Aaron Katz, the dean, was defamed.
In response, YU is counter suing, claiming that Derech
Etz Chaim "utterly refused to protect" its students from Rabbi Weinberg.
It also charges that Rabbi Katz chose to ignore allegations of sexual misconduct
made against Rabbi Weinberg, which first came to light in The Jewish Week
last May.
Though Rabbi Weinberg is not officially listed as a
member of the Derech Etz Chaim faculty, he is considered to be its spiritual
mentor, and offers weekly lectures at the yeshiva. Rabbi Katz is a former
student of Rabbi Weinberg, having attended the Kerem Yeshiva in Santa Clara,
Calif., that Rabbi Weinberg founded in the 1970s and left suddenly in 1982
amid rumors of sexual abuse against students. Rabbi Weinberg then settled
in Israel. Two of Rabbi Weinberg's sons have been on the Derech Etz Chaim
faculty, and favored students in the yeshiva often were invited to Rabbi
Weinberg's home for Shabbat and other occasions.
Rabbi Weinberg is not a party to the lawsuit, and he
has strenuously denied the allegations of sexual abuse. He has not been deposed
in the case and is listed as a potential witness, but observers believe that
YU will make his behavior the centerpiece of its case, calling as witnesses
former students who allege that he made sexual advances to them.
If so, it would mark the first time that such charges
against Rabbi Weinberg — some going back more than two decades —
were made in a public setting.
Last May, a bet din (religious court) in New York heard
testimony from at least six former students, some of whom attended Kerem
in the 1970s, and at least one who attended Derech Etz Chaim several years
ago, charging that Rabbi Weinberg had abused them, or sought to. The testimony
was passed on to a bet din in Jerusalem, which chose not to pursue the
case.
Rabbi Weinberg is expected to be in New York at some
point in the next two weeks, scheduled to officiate at the May 9 wedding
of the son of businessman Stephen Rosenberg of Monsey, a longtime supporter
of the rabbi who is said to have provided major funding for the Derech Etz
Chaim legal case.
Rosenberg did not respond to efforts to reach him.
YU is being represented in the case by Stephen Fuchs
and Jed Marcus of Grotta, Glassman and Hoffman, a New York firm. Marcus said
the counter suit was undertaken "reluctantly," based on the belief that Derech
Etz Chaim "misrepresented itself when it came into the [Joint Israel] Program"
five years ago.
Derech Etz Chaim had been represented by Greenberg,
Traurig, a major firm based in New York, but it recently withdrew from the
case, which will be handled at trial by Hayim Gross, a devotee of Rabbi Weinberg
and original co-counsel from Bloomfield Hills, Mich.
Gross denied that the case would center on the allegations
against Rabbi Weinberg, but did not elaborate.
The series of events leading up the trial began in
February 2003, when YU, after an internal investigation of Derech Etz Chaim
prompted by allegations from students and former students associated with
Rabbi Weinberg, terminated its affiliation with the school. The decision
was based on a "review" of "the educational standards and learning environment"
there, according to a letter YU sent to parents of Derech Etz Chaim students
slated to attend YU explaining the situation.
(As part of YU's Joint Israel Program, Derech Etz Chaim
was one of a number of Israeli yeshivot attended by American post-high school
students for at least a year before entering YU with sophomore status.)
Derech Etz Chaim officials, claiming the review was
false and "improper," filed suit in May 2003, asserting that YU had "disparaged"
the school by telling those who made inquiries that Rabbi Weinberg "was creating
a cult-like atmosphere" at the yeshiva, and "had been accused of engaging
in appropriate sexual contact" with a student.
YU's counter suit said that Rabbi Katz, the Derech
Etz Chaim dean, was told of "credible allegations" of abuse, "going back
20 years," against Rabbi Weinberg, and that Rabbi Katz "refused ... to take
any actions to safeguard students."
Negotiations were held between Derech Etz Chaim and
YU officials in an effort to avoid the trial, but the talks were said to
have broken down when Derech Etz Chaim insisted on being reinstated in the
Joint Israel Program and YU refused. n
Below are some of the comments made regarding the case
of Rabbi Matis Weinberg
A thought @ 1:28PM | 2004-04-30
If years ago the Jewish community had stepped in and
cleaned things up we wouldn't have gotten to this point. These problems go
back at least 4 decades when the first signs began emerging at Ner Israel
(Baltimore and Toronto) and today we have the following Ner alumni making
news:
1) Rabbi Israel Kestenbaum - probation, trying to meet
underage teenage girls for sex on the internet
2) Rabbi Ephraim Bryks - resgned from the RCA under
cloud of child molestation allegations
3) And now Rabbi Matis Weinberg
------------------------------------------------------
A thought @ 1:31PM | 2004-04-30| permalink
60's article on Ner Israel Toronto when it was run
by Matis' father before they returned a year later to Baltimore:
Student Rabbi expelled for 'causing unrest'
Toronto Star (Canada), Sat., May 31, 1969 p.6
An American student has been expelled from Ner Israel
Yeshiva College on Finch Ave. for allegedly causing unrest among studentd
at the associated Ner Israel high School on the same campus.
Faculty president Rabbi J. S. Weinberg said Joseph
Markin, 22, a visiting student was "out permanently" for "deliberately provoking
younger students into feeling that injustices had been done before discussing
the matter with me."
Markin studying to become a rabbi, said he was accused
of instigating a protest demonstration last wednesday. He said he knew about
the protest but did not suggest it or take part.
Rabbi Weinberg denied that there had been a demonstration,
but said some people had tried to cause trouble. A mimeographed list of "abuses"
by Rabbi Weinberg, including staff changes, was circulated at the high school
and the college.
The rabbi said a high school student had been "interrogated
against his will." He said he was taking disciplinary action against those
responsible.
(Alleged Victims Name withheld), 16, a high school
student, said he was assaulted by two college students seeking names of those
behind the protest.
(Alleged Victims Name withheld) said he and 14 other
students were suspended for a day on Wednesday morning to prevent them from
holding the protest. Rabbi Weinberg said 15 students were suspended for
oversleeping and missing morning prayers.
------------------------------------------------------
me @ 11:07PM | 2004-05-04| permalink
The Awareness Center also has this story of abuse regarding
Ner in the 50s. I think it gives at least a sense of part of the
problem.
1) young vulnerable children from dysfunctional family
being sent to remove them from that dysfunctional situation
2) same children at the mercy of older children, bullies
and other troubled children
3) unaddressed systemic sexual abuse problem in
institution
4) victims treated as guity party and tossed out just
like abusers
5) staff does not have the training or experience to
deal with the problem
6) victim is made to feel they have no where to
turn
7) the more isolated they are, the easier they become
prey
Gary Rosenblatt - Editor And Publisher
http://www.thejewishweek.com/news/newscontent.php3?artid=9406
Rabbi Matis Weinberg: Allegations of sexual abuse
remain.
An 11th_hour agreement was expected to be finalized this week
between Derech Etz Chaim, a small Jerusalem yeshiva, and Yeshiva University,
the major Modern Orthodox institution, canceling out competing lawsuits on
the eve of a federal court hearing in Manhattan, according to sources close
to the case.
What remains an open question, though, is what, if
anything, will come of the allegations of sexual abuse against Rabbi Matis
Weinberg, a leading Torah scholar and author, which were at the crux of the
case.
One source close to the case said that charges of criminal
behavior against Rabbi Weinberg have been filed with Interpol, the international
police, which is investigating the matter, according to the source.
Derech Etz Chaim is said to be dropping its
breach-of-contract charge against YU, which had been prompted by YU cutting
its ties last year with the 6-year-old yeshiva located in the Har Nof section
of Jerusalem. The YU decision was based on reports that Rabbi Weinberg, who
is seen as the spiritual mentor of Derech Etz Chaim, had a history of abuse,
a charge he strongly denies.
Derech Etz Chaim had been one of a number of Israeli
yeshivot attended by American post-high school students who then went on
to attend YU.
Derech Etz Chaim had been seeking reinstatement in
the YU program, claiming that its removal was a severe financial blow. It
had sued for at least $75,000, arguing that the allegations against Rabbi
Weinberg were false, and that Rabbi Aaron Katz, the dean of Derech Etz Chaim,
was defamed.
YU, in turn, is expected to drop its counter suit that
claimed Derech Etz Chaim "utterly refused to protect" its students from Rabbi
Weinberg.
Charges about Rabbi Weinberg's behavior, dating back
more than 20 years and including an alleged incident from 2003, first came
to light last year, and were taken up by a bet din (religious court) in Brooklyn.
The bet din's findings, including testimony from at least six of the rabbi's
former students, were then passed on to a haredi bet din in Jerusalem, which
decided not to pursue the case.
Several former students of the rabbi claiming abuse,
here and in Israel, were set to appear as witnesses in the federal trial
here.
Now that the trial will not take place, questions have
been raised about whether former students will press criminal charges in
Israel or whether the original bet din in Brooklyn will take up the matter
again.
Observers note that the case points up one of the
weaknesses in the Orthodox community in that it has no mechanism in place
to investigate or pursue such allegations, either to punish or clear an
individual. The Rabbinical Council of America, the rabbinic arm of the Orthodox
Union, is planning to put in place next month a new committee to deal with
rabbinic abuse.
Rabbi Mark Dratch, who is chairing the committee, said
he hopes that "investigating and making a determination of veracity in a
case should give sufficient strength to the community to take proper action."
He added that he had no direct knowledge of the Weinberg case and that the
RCA group will only deal with its membership. Rabbi Weinberg is not a member
of the RCA.
LivingTree.org - April
28, 2005
Daily Learning with Rav Matisse
Jewish Whistleblower
"I was listening to daf yomi at www.thelivingtree.org
when I realized that the voice was familiar. So was the picture of Rav Matisse,
the Rabbi with no last name. Why was it so familiar?"
Google Search: "Matisse Weinberg"
01-mp3search.exe N°1 among the Mp3 searchers Artists
RAU - RAY
... Rav Matisse Weinberg, Raving Dave, Ray Cruz, Ray,
Rimpy, Chris, Nick & Matt (.Rav Meir Goldwicht, Raving Poets - Ian Walker,
Ray Cummins, Ray Rosas, ...www.01-mp3search.com/top56-R-008.html - 92k -
<nCached - Similar pages
FAIR USE NOTICE
Some of the information on The Awareness Center's
web pages may contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always
been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material
available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political,
human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues,
etc.
We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any
such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright
Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this
site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.
For more information go to:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this update for purposes
of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Last Updated: 05/03/2007
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed
citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever
has."
--Margaret Mead
No comments:
Post a Comment